[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Twenty years since the Knicks went 3 consecutive years winning less than 33 games
Author Thread
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/5/2017  2:44 AM
Ding, Rosen or Shelbourne will certainly have an explanation if this happens this year. Phil's Knicks have won at an almost 33% rate over his three year term. His winning percentage has the Knicks at 32 or 33 wins. That would mean that the knicks were at a historic low winning percantage of 33 or 32 percent for three consecutive years. The last time the Knicks were this bad Hubie was the coach. The winning percentage for the knicks the three years prior to Phil was 55%.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
AUTOADVERT
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

3/5/2017  4:18 AM    LAST EDITED: 3/5/2017  9:32 AM
Guess we better win 34.... forget getting the best lottery pick.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
nyknickzingis
Posts: 23029
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/8/2015
Member: #6207

3/5/2017  7:12 AM
Meaningless stat
Losing is losing
Missing the playoffs is missing the playoffs

Knicks had one good season in 13 years prior to Phil Jackson coming to the Knicks.

nyknickzingis
Posts: 23029
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/8/2015
Member: #6207

3/5/2017  7:43 AM
The first year was legit bad, and Phil definitely messed up with some trades, because that team had no chance and was no good. However it led to KP and it may be remembered for something there.

The second year we began 22-22. I know this board well, because I was on it all the time and the excitement here last year was legit. We all loved how Lance Thomas was playing, how Melo was finally playing like a point forward who would get you 5 assista a geme, and KP was a marvel rookie. Things went south once Lance got hurt and KP hit a wall. Melo has since then also reverted into ISO stall the offense Melo again. The Knicks had a lottery pick, developed KP and had some early success that showed promise. Unfortunately before Phil got here the Knicks had already traded away this pick foolishly. This isn't Phil's fault, he should have a clean slate to work with, and hasn't. Losing a draft pick this like this is a huge blow.

In the offseason traded for Rose, because Melo wanted a point guard and the team clearly needed an attacking point guard. We got a coach that would modernize the Triangle and install other offense as well. We signed Noah because he was not going to clog up the middle like Rolo (who I loved) and we could run more spread out offense with better ball movement as Noah, Rose, Melo could all move the ball and get 4-5 assists a piece. Two great shooters and play finishers in Lee and KP around them. In theory that team should be able to play well on both ends if they play hard and together. Brandon Jennings was brought in for the bench. Kuz was a nice pick up as a rookie free agent, as was Baker. Holiday was a nice piece in the Rose trade as we lost Jerian Grant who have us athleticism and guard play off the bench. Another great rookie pick up was Hernangomez signing him using free agency money locked him into a nice longterm deal.

I feel the moves Phil made over the past summer were right at the time, outside of the Noah contract. The only move I didn't like was the Noah contract. Too many years, too much money. Should have been a 3 year 50 million deal at most. Phil messeed up with the additional year.

This year we began pretty well, 14-10 but were bad defensively from the start. Rose missing training camp hurt chemistry big time. Noah was out most of camp and has never been healthy. Melo reverted back to iso Melo who jacks up as many shots as possible with a very low assist rate. Melo's usage rate did not change, in fact went up a few decimal points. KP's defense did not improve in year 2 which left us without a quality defender in the starting 5. We are going lottery, but will have our own draft pick this time to add a cheap longterm investment.

The situation is pretty solid for the Knicks longterm. They have $25 million in capspace this summer. Next summer Melo is likely opting out (if he is not traded before). The Knicks will have massive capspace then. They don't have any bad contracts beyond Noah.

Give it some time. I think Phil has made some mistakes, but our situation longterm is not bad at all. We were in a much worse place longterm when our draft picks were traded away and we did not have a young emerging star like Porzingis. Phil needs to stop tweeting crap about players, he needs to stop signing over the hill vets like Noah. He needs to draft extremely well as these picks are key to the team getting better. Some big decisions coming this summer as to what to do with Rose and Melo. For me this is Phil's last year to show if he's really going get the Knicks in the right direction.

franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
3/5/2017  7:56 AM
If Phil gives up any pretense of us winning next year, and his goal is to build to be competitive in 2-3 years, then I think we have a chance to start.

Pretty shocking how bad we've been. Dolan has never wanted to rebuild, yet his end results have been far worse.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/5/2017  8:22 AM    LAST EDITED: 3/5/2017  8:22 AM
nyknickzingis wrote:Meaningless stat
Losing is losing
Missing the playoffs is missing the playoffs

Knicks had one good season in 13 years prior to Phil Jackson coming to the Knicks.


So if the Knicks have a 6 or 7 playoff seed next year, you will count it as a bad season?
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

3/5/2017  10:13 AM
nyknickzingis wrote:
In the offseason traded for Rose, because Melo wanted a point guard

So I am suppose to believe that Phil went out and got a PG because Melo wanted in when he hadn't considered Melo's opinion in any other personnel decisions? That seems to go against Phil Jackson's Modus operandi.

Even if I suspend my belief of how Phil operates why go after one of the worst pg's in the league statistically on both sides of the ball? My point being is Rose being here is 100% on Phil and Melo should not be brought up as an excuse for another one of Jackson's Phailures.

Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
3/5/2017  10:16 AM
That's crazy. Well let's give a tank a chance. It really is the only way we haven't gone until Phil got here. We have a KP for it. Now let do this and maybe we can get something too.

All we are saying is give tank a chance.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/5/2017  10:51 AM
yellowboy90 wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:
In the offseason traded for Rose, because Melo wanted a point guard

So I am suppose to believe that Phil went out and got a PG because Melo wanted in when he hadn't considered Melo's opinion in any other personnel decisions? That seems to go against Phil Jackson's Modus operandi.

Even if I suspend my belief of how Phil operates why go after one of the worst pg's in the league statistically on both sides of the ball? My point being is Rose being here is 100% on Phil and Melo should not be brought up as an excuse for another one of Jackson's Phailures.

Melo openly complained about the notion of rebuilding. Phil and Melo met and talked about the pace of improvement and Melo wanted to try and win now, so Phil obliged him. He surely didn't go for Rose and BJ on his own account. This was one last attempt to do something with Melo.

My guess is Phil is thinking about building around a new young core!!!

Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
3/5/2017  10:59 AM
nixluva wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:
In the offseason traded for Rose, because Melo wanted a point guard

So I am suppose to believe that Phil went out and got a PG because Melo wanted in when he hadn't considered Melo's opinion in any other personnel decisions? That seems to go against Phil Jackson's Modus operandi.

Even if I suspend my belief of how Phil operates why go after one of the worst pg's in the league statistically on both sides of the ball? My point being is Rose being here is 100% on Phil and Melo should not be brought up as an excuse for another one of Jackson's Phailures.

Melo openly complained about the notion of rebuilding. Phil and Melo met and talked about the pace of improvement and Melo wanted to try and win now, so Phil obliged him. He surely didn't go for Rose and BJ on his own account. This was one last attempt to do something with Melo.

My guess is Phil is thinking about building around a new young core!!!

Phil tried to build around Melo. It doesn't work it's time to go another direction. One that doesn't include Melo. He is the core of the problem.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/5/2017  11:22 AM
Vmart wrote:
nixluva wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:
In the offseason traded for Rose, because Melo wanted a point guard

So I am suppose to believe that Phil went out and got a PG because Melo wanted in when he hadn't considered Melo's opinion in any other personnel decisions? That seems to go against Phil Jackson's Modus operandi.

Even if I suspend my belief of how Phil operates why go after one of the worst pg's in the league statistically on both sides of the ball? My point being is Rose being here is 100% on Phil and Melo should not be brought up as an excuse for another one of Jackson's Phailures.

Melo openly complained about the notion of rebuilding. Phil and Melo met and talked about the pace of improvement and Melo wanted to try and win now, so Phil obliged him. He surely didn't go for Rose and BJ on his own account. This was one last attempt to do something with Melo.

My guess is Phil is thinking about building around a new young core!!!

Phil tried to build around Melo. It doesn't work it's time to go another direction. One that doesn't include Melo. He is the core of the problem.

YUP! Melo can't say Phil didn't try to give him some help. Now it's time to move on to building around KP. I hope they can get a high pick in this draft and get another STUD and more quality talent.

yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

3/5/2017  11:38 AM
nixluva wrote:
Vmart wrote:
nixluva wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:
In the offseason traded for Rose, because Melo wanted a point guard

So I am suppose to believe that Phil went out and got a PG because Melo wanted in when he hadn't considered Melo's opinion in any other personnel decisions? That seems to go against Phil Jackson's Modus operandi.

Even if I suspend my belief of how Phil operates why go after one of the worst pg's in the league statistically on both sides of the ball? My point being is Rose being here is 100% on Phil and Melo should not be brought up as an excuse for another one of Jackson's Phailures.

Melo openly complained about the notion of rebuilding. Phil and Melo met and talked about the pace of improvement and Melo wanted to try and win now, so Phil obliged him. He surely didn't go for Rose and BJ on his own account. This was one last attempt to do something with Melo.

My guess is Phil is thinking about building around a new young core!!!

Phil tried to build around Melo. It doesn't work it's time to go another direction. One that doesn't include Melo. He is the core of the problem.

YUP! Melo can't say Phil didn't try to give him some help. Now it's time to move on to building around KP. I hope they can get a high pick in this draft and get another STUD and more quality talent.

You can't say you are helping someone cure their cold by giving them the flu. Phil lack of ability to properly assess talent is terrible. He is going to build around KP in a similar fashion because he thinks his triangle will mask players deficiencies.

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

3/5/2017  12:02 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/5/2017  12:03 PM
nixluva wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:
In the offseason traded for Rose, because Melo wanted a point guard

So I am suppose to believe that Phil went out and got a PG because Melo wanted in when he hadn't considered Melo's opinion in any other personnel decisions? That seems to go against Phil Jackson's Modus operandi.

Even if I suspend my belief of how Phil operates why go after one of the worst pg's in the league statistically on both sides of the ball? My point being is Rose being here is 100% on Phil and Melo should not be brought up as an excuse for another one of Jackson's Phailures.

Melo openly complained about the notion of rebuilding. Phil and Melo met and talked about the pace of improvement and Melo wanted to try and win now, so Phil obliged him. He surely didn't go for Rose and BJ on his own account. This was one last attempt to do something with Melo.

My guess is Phil is thinking about building around a new young core!!!

It's a silly notion to think you can win in this league with the Knicks current bench...If Melo has to play the entire quarter at his age, in which he has to wait for KP to get his rest and back in the game, the coach is telling you he doesn't have confidence in the bench...

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

3/5/2017  12:09 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/5/2017  12:11 PM
3 years of winning less than 33 games which may amount to an average of 27 win per season and you get a chorus of Phil needs time..I remember the days when 1 year of 37 wins not making the playoffs was enough to banish Woodson...
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
3/5/2017  12:18 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Vmart wrote:
nixluva wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:
In the offseason traded for Rose, because Melo wanted a point guard

So I am suppose to believe that Phil went out and got a PG because Melo wanted in when he hadn't considered Melo's opinion in any other personnel decisions? That seems to go against Phil Jackson's Modus operandi.

Even if I suspend my belief of how Phil operates why go after one of the worst pg's in the league statistically on both sides of the ball? My point being is Rose being here is 100% on Phil and Melo should not be brought up as an excuse for another one of Jackson's Phailures.

Melo openly complained about the notion of rebuilding. Phil and Melo met and talked about the pace of improvement and Melo wanted to try and win now, so Phil obliged him. He surely didn't go for Rose and BJ on his own account. This was one last attempt to do something with Melo.

My guess is Phil is thinking about building around a new young core!!!

Phil tried to build around Melo. It doesn't work it's time to go another direction. One that doesn't include Melo. He is the core of the problem.

YUP! Melo can't say Phil didn't try to give him some help. Now it's time to move on to building around KP. I hope they can get a high pick in this draft and get another STUD and more quality talent.

You can't say you are helping someone cure their cold by giving them the flu. Phil lack of ability to properly assess talent is terrible. He is going to build around KP in a similar fashion because he thinks his triangle will mask players deficiencies.

Melo wanted Chicago he brought it to him. As for the cold to a flu the immune system was already weak.

Nalod
Posts: 72102
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
3/5/2017  12:20 PM
crush with another dark side post about the obvious.
The previous three years came at a price. While far from perfect, what would phil have done better with hindsight that was a bonafide alternative?
Sure GM's make good and bad decisions.

I don't know why some of you take his bait and try to describe to him that a core of Melo, JR, Tyson and Shump was not that good.
Replace Melo with Lebron, it gets better. Add Kyrie Irving an Love, it really gets good.

I took the bait but im cutting this line.....

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
3/5/2017  12:21 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/5/2017  12:26 PM
Vmart wrote:That's crazy. Well let's give a tank a chance. It really is the only way we haven't gone until Phil got here. We have a KP for it. Now let do this and maybe we can get something too.

All we are saying is give tank a chance.

Knicks need to give winning a chance, by playing with some smarts and effort down the stretch.

They need to give Rambis a chance at another job, like triangle seminars in alaska

ES
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30259
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
3/5/2017  12:33 PM
We use to trade draft future draft picks for past prime veterans in order to win 36-40 games year in and year out. Since we stopped doing that. The trade off is that we will have worse records then those other years presently, but possibly have a better future then any of those years.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

3/5/2017  1:23 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:We use to trade draft future draft picks for past prime veterans in order to win 36-40 games year in and year out. Since we stopped doing that. The trade off is that we will have worse records then those other years presently, but possibly have a better future then any of those years.
Exactly. Either way we lose BUT at least now we have a future to look forward to. We have willy and kp along with all our future picks. Time to build this franchise the right way
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
3/5/2017  1:30 PM
Knicks just need to tank. Need to move on from Melo and Rose in the summer and do a proper rebuild. Melo is throwing Hornacek under the bus, it's time to blow it up. It's been time for a while.
¿ △ ?
Twenty years since the Knicks went 3 consecutive years winning less than 33 games

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy