crzymdups wrote:Isn't Lance Thomas number 42? I would argue he is not the answer. No hitchhiker's guide contains the solution here.
The problem is the management as installed by Dolan and Mills. They enabled Marbury, they enabled Melo, they're in the process of enabling Rose (which should tell you everything you need to know when it comes to whether or not they'll re-sign him).
That means no accountability, players further down the totem pole who resent the star treatment given to the big boys, and things like zero effort on D. Why play hard on D if you don't get taken out of the game? Why make the extra pass and find the best shot when your leader doesn't bother most of the time?
This team is a mess, and dare I quote Phil - "clumsily constructed"...
Isn't it funny that in three complete tear downs of the roster that he's never been able to better the supposed clumsy roster he inherited. In Woodson, Tyson, Amar'e, JR, Felton, Pablo, etc's final season the team went 37-45 after the disastrous Bargnani trade and Tyson missing a good portion of the season with a broken leg. We're in Phil's 4th full season and he's never won more than 32.
At least we have KP.
If Dolan tries to make a panic move to right the ship and "move two rotation players" and that includes shipping out a first round pick, I might truly be done with this team. Dolan - if you're listening - can we for once rebuild the team with draft picks? Have you noticed how much the Garden faithful love rookie players EVERY SINGLE TIME? Imagine if we had 3 or 4 straight years in the lottery and got two stars and two very solid rotation players. That's how you build a team - c.f. Golden State, OKC, San Antonio, heck even Cleveland did that after they lost Lebron and that worked out pretty well for them. There's no short cut here.
Yeah, I was referring to hitchhikers guide, not Lance Thomas.
IMO, the problem is not management per se. The NBAdoes not compensate for the differences in taxes from one franchise to another. That is one problem the Knicks have especially with the higher priced FAs. Miami's offer being equal to ours is always a sweeter financial deal. This is true for many franchises on the up and downside of the equation.
NY's fanbase and media base, while certainly basketball knowledgeable, may be the most vicious in all of sports. This eliminates many players who self-select their way out of ever truly wanting to sign here. This is not to say their agents don't advertise that NY "is interested" whenever they want to up the ante.
I'm an outlier in that I think Dolan has always wanted a winner and has tried his best to make it so. Obviously, he spent many years failing. And I may be an outlier in that I am wholeheartedly supportive of PJ. I cannot think of anyone smarter, more invested in the Knicks improving, or more dedicated to getting it done. It should be noted that Dolan has repeatedly attracted GMs and management who helped build contenders elsewhere. We are on the right track, IMO.
I'm fascinated by the Rose incident.While the conventional wisdom is [loudly] to punish the player with suspension, Phil has chosen to pragmatically motivate Rose by standing by Rose as a player and punishing the behavior with a large fine that likely makes its way to a local charity. maybe Phil recognises that young players from tough backgrounds are used to being punished right or wrong and more of that response will not yield the desired effect. This is as ZEN as it gets folks. Let's see if Rose resonds to kindness better than public and team embarassment.
I disagree about the teardowns. I hated layden/Houston teams - they were awful. I lament that Larry Brown was side-railed but I liked what Isiah Thomas tried to do under the circumstances. While it didn't work out, it was an honest effort to beat the odds. the Walsh/D'Antoni regime was also looking good until the disasterous Bargnani deal [forced on the Knicks by that agents group from hell].
Phil's attempt is looking great future-wise but stumbling recently. IMO, Jennings, Thomas, Sasha, and even Lee should be made available in trade. I add Lee because I think he has high value in a year where we are unlikely to be able to cash in on his window. Baker and Kuz need minutesand a player or two who play both eneds of the court.
I have never advocated trading first round picks unless the return is outstanding. I don't imagine Phil making that kind of deal.