BRIGGS wrote:nixluva wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:nixluva wrote:I get the general idea but really don't know if it makes sense when you can just bring up a kid like Randle for next to nothing and continue to develop Baker. I actually think Randle has similar talent to Seth if given a chance.
its a BIG jump for Randle. I get what you are saying and like randle but i would want someone who has had some success in the nba
I think with time Randle could make the adjustment to the NBA level. A talented scorer like Randle is going to get some great looks playing with the talent level we have in the NBA. The shots are there for our PG's but neither Rose nor BJ are really confident 3pt shooters like Randle. Randle is the real deal in terms of his shooting. Also it's a simple move for him to play in a system that is familiar. I'd rather give that a shot before looking to make any drastic moves.
True--maybe time to give Randle the chance Curry got.Obvious difference is that Curry has now done this over 100 NBA games--but we also would have to give up and we have no idea if Dallas would even be interested.
I don't understand why the Knicks would be interested.
Curry to me seems like a SG and the Knicks are set at that position.
The Knicks need to improve their D