Papabear wrote:Papabear Says

What kind of man would want to pull a train on a female. It's wrong. I'm glad its over and now its time for Derek Rose to earn his pay.

You judging his sexual preferences? She was his girl for 18 months. There were other trains involving Rose and her, including the two friends in question. Maybe you haven't seen much porn in your day, but it's not all that uncommon for a nympho to want to do a few dudes at once, or in a row. If it's her thing, then why judge her or Rose. What they do in privacy is for them to know about, not the public. This classless golddigga made it public, and props to Rose for calling her on it. Saved himself a lot of cheddah.

Now it's time to hoop in NYC!

Dagger wrote:What's disturbing is that there are some media members that are upset about this, like they wanted so badly for him to be guilty so they could crucify him and mock the Knicks as well. Rose may not be a good person, but which is more f'ed up: Rose taking a pic with a juror after the verdict, or a reporter hoping that a rape did occur just so they would have something to write about for a week?

Or perhaps calling him a bad person cuz you don't agree with his private sex life? Maybe everyone should make public their web history before they hypocritically call out someone's private life. Don't condone it but not going to judge. To your point, the majority of people like to see things crash and burn. They want anyone, that has a dollar more than them or a slightly better life than them, come crashing down. Those trolls will find any reason to stand on their soap box. At least the media has the excuse that it's their job to wish bad on people so they can sell advertising.

ESOMKnicks wrote:For a predominantly female jury to fully clear Rose in only 3 hours of deliberation, the plaintiff must have looked really deceitful on the stand.

In reality, everyone has been a loser in this case, lessons learned, let's all move on.

This is where I'm at.

Let's get back to basketball.

nixluva wrote:Glad this is over. It really was a tough thing to deal with for everyone involved. NO ONE came out looking good in this case. Messy stuff but now we can move on and get on with basketball and hopefully no more accusing Forum Members of excusing rape!!!

fishmike wrote:

EnySpree wrote:

nixluva wrote:Glad this is over. It really was a tough thing to deal with for everyone involved. NO ONE came out looking good in this case. Messy stuff but now we can move on and get on with basketball and hopefully no more accusing Forum Members of excusing rape!!!

mreinman wrote:And one day, Alleged Rape (especially by a Knick) will be just as on topic as Police shootings, Race, and our Presidential race.

As I posted from the article, it is expected that this will be brushed aside since he is on our team and we choose to ignore or not face it:

When they do something outside of that box, we become annoyed — stick to sports! If they do something bad, more often than not we simply ignore it.

Mreinman crossed that line. I won't forget that. That's all I'll say

Yea... we were all just another bunch of Cosby enablers. Man people really like to spout before they have a clue. I was not a fan of what he said either. Funny how many of the guys who were really jumping on Rose were the same guys who didn't like the trade. So phucking lame. Happy this BS is over and its back to hoops.

In other news KP killing it in the first half

StarksEwing1 wrote:

nixluva wrote:Glad this is over. It really was a tough thing to deal with for everyone involved. NO ONE came out looking good in this case. Messy stuff but now we can move on and get on with basketball and hopefully no more accusing Forum Members of excusing rape!!!

i dont remember anyone accusing forum members of excusing rape. However if Rose was still in a Bulls jersey i doubt he would have support even if he was innocent as well