knickscity wrote:For me it's defense and the bench. While I do think the Knicks will be a good offensive team, I think their defense will be highly suspect. The concern about the bench is the depth. A lot of unknowns there, and while I like Jennings being added, I'm not a fan of him being in a sixth man type role. I also think the starters will have to log heavier than they should minutes because of the bench.
I'm not so concerned with the starters having to log heavy minutes or games played. I actually think there's a very good chance that Hornacek can get just what he needs from this bench. It all starts with a quality top 7 rotation. I believe the Knicks have that. If you go 7 deep with quality players then you are talking about only 3 subs per game in order to get to 10 men in the game. I think that's a pretty doable thing for Horny.
The Knicks coach claims not to be concerned they will have too weak a bench because of the way he plans to use his three big guns — Rose, Porzingis and Anthony.“I’m hoping with the three guys, hopefully have two of those guys on the court,” Hornacek said. “It will take pressure off the bench guys to make an open shot. They’re not going to be a real focus necessarily. That always makes it easier for the guys to be comfortable out there. If you’re trying to sub five guys in as a group, it would be more difficult.”
“Look at our roster, between Carmelo, Kristaps, Derrick, three guys who can put the ball in the hole,” Hornacek said. “We have to have role guys. If they want to stop one of those guys with a double-team, we have a guy who can knock a shot in. That [shooting-guard] spot is important for a guy who can knock down shots, create the space.”
Since he made those statements we officially signed Lee and he could be included in the mix. Then added Jennings and re-signed Thomas. Brought in Willy, Kuz and Ndour. Holiday, Sasha, and maybe Baker and Randle give this team a lot of possible depth. I think this team has some talent to work with.