[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

I how about KT -2 2nd rounders+3mm to Pheonix for
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/29/2004  6:52 PM
Joe Johnson and Jake Voshkul?

forget all this jamal crawford stuff --thats a dead end Pheonix still needs quality bigs and KT would fit nicely. now that they have Q-rich joe johnson makes a LOT of sense for us,
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
7/29/2004  7:02 PM
Thats a nice deal, however, by trading Kurt you basically say goodbye to any chance of getting guys like Dampier or Antoine Walker. I would try those deals first and if none of them worked out then I would attempt the Johnson deal.
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/29/2004  7:07 PM
this stuff that we are going to get Dampier via trade is hogwash, but there is slight hope that we can MLE him.

Who do I want out of antoine walker and Joe Johnson? hmmmm not even close plus again the numbers match up easy with pheonix you still have a 9mm gap with walker. we have0 need for walker anyway
RIP Crushalot😞
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/29/2004  7:14 PM
Why would Pheonix spend $36 mil on Kurt to play at the age of 32 to 36 when they have Amare? They can get a better PF next summer for the MLE.

And the Crawford deal isn't dead until February when the trade deadline passes.
rain
Posts: 20762
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/13/2002
Member: #353
USA
7/29/2004  7:18 PM
they are in love with Johnson, they won't trade him.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/29/2004  7:19 PM
Posted by rain:

they are in love with Johnson, they won't trade him.
I agree; they're more likely to trade Marion than Joe Johnson
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/29/2004  7:34 PM
KT is only making 4 years 26mm about the same as an MLE which is a bargain right now. KT can easily play C with Amare at PF especially since shaq isnt not in the west. you slide Marion to his natural position at PF and Q goes to SG with Nash at PG. Good big players are hard to come by and trading max players with a long run on their contract is even harder. I believe they bought Q because they are afraid of paying Joe johnson next year, because he could get a maximum offer. for the knicks thats easy to absorb and teams know that and would stay away from pursuing him.

Shaq was an extraordinary trade, but it would be HARD to deal a SF for a real good big man. Having KT and Lampe at C is pretty solid.
RIP Crushalot😞
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/29/2004  8:51 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

KT is only making 4 years 26mm about the same as an MLE which is a bargain right now. KT can easily play C with Amare at PF especially since shaq isnt not in the west. you slide Marion to his natural position at PF and Q goes to SG with Nash at PG. Good big players are hard to come by and trading max players with a long run on their contract is even harder. I believe they bought Q because they are afraid of paying Joe johnson next year, because he could get a maximum offer. for the knicks thats easy to absorb and teams know that and would stay away from pursuing him.

Shaq was an extraordinary trade, but it would be HARD to deal a SF for a real good big man. Having KT and Lampe at C is pretty solid.
KT has four years, $28 mil left on his contract, which after his 20% trade kicker, BRIGGS, comes to $34 mil (I was off slightly when I said $36 mil). Given that Kurt is an 11/8 player at age 32, how unappealing does paying him $10 mil when he's 36 sound? (That's what his salary comes too after the trade kicker.)
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
7/29/2004  8:58 PM
"this stuff that we are going to get Dampier via trade is hogwash, but there is slight hope that we can MLE him.
Who do I want out of antoine walker and Joe Johnson? hmmmm not even close plus again the numbers match up easy with pheonix you still have a 9mm gap with walker. we have0 need for walker anyway"





We definitely have a better shot at Dampier via trade. There is no way he will take the MLE know that Atlanta according to sources has upped their offer. I know we could use another guard that can score, however, we need frontcourt help much more. I'll take Antoine over Johnson or even Crawford. I know you are going to say that it will stunt Sweetney's growth but a year of coming off the bench won't hurt him if he gets around 15-20 mpg. Plus, if Antoine doesn't work out at least he has en expiring contract that we could use to get another young player or some picks. The only reason people think we need another guard that can score is because of the playoffs when we had to give Shandon minutes since Tim and Allan were out. If Tim is healthy, Penny and Frank are good enough to fill the SG position if Allan gets injured. Now that we have Ariza, we can use him as a backup 3 which means that we can give Penny more minutes at the 2. We could use a guy like Johnson or Crawford, but we need frontcourt help much more. I like Joe, but I would definitely rather have Antoine Walker.

[Edited by - s3231 on 07/29/2004 20:59:28]
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/29/2004  9:10 PM
i never heard of a 20% trade kicker, [10-15% is the norm]+ they can be waived. On top of that-it would only apply to the 3 year extension of 21mm-- and lets take your 20% number anyway---20% of 21mm is 4.2mm the knicks pay off 3mm of that--the extra figure to the Suns is 1.2mm[spread over 3 years that does not apply to the cap 400,000G a year] and that is at a maximum. if it is a 10-15% kicker the 3mm basically covers it.

the kicker is a neglible factor.
RIP Crushalot😞
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/29/2004  9:21 PM
no way--id take johnson first Crawford 2nd and walker comes in a very weak last.
im just going to put down what we likely have at this second

vin baker[ apparently he is signing a 3 year 10mm]
mike Sweetney
Nazr Mohammed
Dikembe
Kurt thomas
Othella harrington

now i know some of these guys wont be here, but it is LIKELY that atleast 4 will be IMHO. If we pencil Mike Sweetney into the starting 4 and Baker backing him up with Nazr and Deke at C-where does antoine walker play and why would we want him anyway?

a true reality is H2) may never come back-- penny is shaky for many issues and FW is a true 1G. That leaves us with Andersen which is unacceptable. Besides a true C our BIGGEST need is a young athletic 2.

To me 4 is taken care of.
RIP Crushalot😞
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
7/29/2004  9:32 PM
Deke will most likely be traded, the same can be said for Othella (his agent wants him out of NY bad). If we get Antoine, Kurt will most likely be traded in a deal for him. So that would leave us with Sweets and Antoine playing the PF position. Baker would back Mohammed up at the 5. That would be a decent frontcourt where no one would complain about playing time. I would rather get Dampier than Antoine but any frontcourt help would be good for this team. Isiah is doing the right thing, he's trying to get both a scoring guard (Crawford) and a big guy that would help make our frontcourt much better (Dampier). I'll agree that Penny is still a little shaky however, he has even said that he feels a lot better and he proved that by playing throught the whole season last year. As for Frankie, he is not a 2, but him and Stephon have shown that they can form a decent backcourt together. Stephon can play the 2 a la Iverson when Frank and him are in the same backcourt. I really think we could use a nice 2 like Johnson or Crawford, but I think the frontcourt is where we need the most help.
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
7/29/2004  9:36 PM
I'd do it. I don't want Walker, because I fear that the Knicks will re-sign him, and I don't want to see the Knicks give Dampier a six year contract at $9 million per years.

It doesn't seem, however, that the contracts match up:

http://hoopshype.com/salaries/phoenix.htm
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
7/29/2004  9:47 PM
No way Phoenix trades Johnson, it's Marion they want out.

And I'll take Marion any day of the week over TT. He's a unique player who would really help this team. Considering they need to re-sign Amare, Joe Johnson, and Casey Jacobsen (in that order) next offseason, they might do a deal with either TT or KT and expiring contracts, since they'd save money.

Marion and Voskuhl for KT, Mutumbo, and Harrington? They'll save a lot of money next year, and I doubt they want their highest paid player to be the 6th man. I think that's a legitimate opportunity, especially with Thomas' game complementing Amare and Q. Q is one of the best posting guards in the game, and Amare's such a beast on the blocks, that a C with Kurt's game (good outside shooter, can stretch defenses, can guard bigger players) might be attractive to them.

If I do that I'm not even interested in Crawford, forget him. Make Penny the backup 2, TT becomes 6th man, and Frank Williams gets a lot more minutes.

The Suns save more than $6 million next year, which they can use to re-sign their players. With their core now (Nash and Barbosa at PG, Johnson and Q on the wings, Amare downlow) do they really need Marion signed for the contract he's at? I think KT should be one of the more attractive big men on the trading block at this time, and his skillset really fits in well with the Suns.

I'm content with having a frontcourt of Sweetney, Baker, Mohammed, and Voskuhl.

[Edited by - bigsm00th on 07/29/2004 21:52:35]
#Knickstaps
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
7/29/2004  10:03 PM
I think the Suns would definitely rather trade Marion before they trade JJ. If they do trade Marion it would most likely be for a center.
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/29/2004  10:04 PM
id be willing to do TT for SM but i dont think Pheonix would do it. trading KT and contracts for Marion is fiscal and personnell insanity because we already haev a young max player and older max player signed for 2 years at SF.

Id be willing to take back eisley with a
KT 5.8
moochie 3.8

for JJ 2.3 and Eisley 6.3 + fork over 3mm for the kicker. Eisley is better than Norris anyway.
RIP Crushalot😞
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/29/2004  10:06 PM
they love JJ so much that they signed another SG for 50mm
RIP Crushalot😞
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
7/29/2004  10:16 PM
"Eisley is better than Norris anyway."




Please tell me your joking
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/29/2004  10:23 PM
TT & KT for Matrix & Eisley...would you make that trade?

then make the trade w/the Bulls for Crawford & let them have Deke instead of Moochie

the NEW YORK SUNS:
C - Nazr / Baker
PF - Sweetney / JYD
SF - Marion / Penny / ERob
SG - Houston / Crawford
PG - Marbury / Eisley / Moochie
IR - Ariza / DerMarr / Trybanski

that team will be capped out until the year '09 though.

but that is 1 ATHLETIC team if i ever saw one!

[Edited by - TMS on 07/29/2004 22:25:54]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/29/2004  10:26 PM
Posted by s3231:

"Eisley is better than Norris anyway."




Please tell me your joking

i actually agree...Eisley's better than Moochie...he just has a worse contract.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
I how about KT -2 2nd rounders+3mm to Pheonix for

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy