Nalod wrote:Would Lin have even wanted back here? Did Phil reject the notion of his return?
Is Dolan sore at the kid?
Would Lin even want to play under the spotlight of expectation and the media crush that comes with it?Then you can "Blame" Phil.
Hi Nalod
I hear your point, I do not think Lin, wanted to come back
Or felt nyk management wanted Lin, even at some
Compromised rates.
My post objective here comes on Jackson,comments
To diminish need of respected starter point guard on
Our team and in his system built.
He is boss, yes it takes time but Phil can
Blah blah blah all he wants to, triangle crap
Or not Jackson needs a good point guard period
Is point Mr. Jackson wants Knicks fans to accept
Garbled nonsense he cites.
You still need some control in any pro hoop
Game by skilled players, to try plan to win
A game!
Point guard need not be best nor allstar.
Of course when you got a Kobe or Jordan, Pippen
LeBron, etc.. Need for value Point guard is
Lessen,
Not too many of those guys type on too many
Nba rosters .
So regarding Jeremy Lin,and your knick pres
Jackson for 2+ years has fed us garbage at a
Valued point guard job responsibility then
Yes Phil Jackson is fully and solely to Blame
And cannot be divorced from,this knick gap hole
At point guard. So you can't see nor get Pg
BETTER than Lin, is more testimony to Jackson's
Ignorance in How much his guards/point sucks.!!!!
If,anybody want to say now if Zen master,
Big chief Triangle Jackson had NOT opened his
Huge mouth to diminish point,guard play in,nba
Or knock knick fans "pipe down fans .." via
Twitter, I would have not began,this post.
Mr Jackson wants to escape criticism or any
Blame for anything,here in NewYork , cause of
His 9 nba coach ring championships titles.
This he takes to Twitter to deflect and defend
His decisions .
No, no, no no nope Phil
Could care less on,.. his prior reputation ..it don't work
This way in Newyork city. NEVER..
This ain't about decisions,
Its solely about team needs a legit stinking point guard which Jackson
Sees different. Grade F, Phil for his remarks or
Failure to work on that issue !
