knicks1248 wrote:BRIGGS wrote:I thinks its best if we can get you into a new situation and then making it publically clear as well.
Because we're going to be a lottery team for 25 more yrs. If we trade you melo, we'll become less of an attraction, and all of the focus can go on 21 yr old kp, we want to start with him and build like minni, philli, the kings, you know teams that haven't made the playoffs since social media was envented.
I think he should keep it private, also teams like Minny should be playoff good soon based on talent. Towns is a future MVP, Wiggins is another monster. What cost them so many years was Kahn drafting not great PG's (he skipped over Curry for Flynn for example) as for the Kings they are the new knicks when it comes to dysfunctional management. The only reason they aren't a national joke is they aren't in a market like NY where they would get undue media attention by default. Philly is another joke but they deserve no better. They trade MCW (who for all his flaws was a ROY) and haven't had an equivalent PG yet. In the NBA a common theme is Teams make mistakes that come to haunt them look at us and Barg. Another example for the knicks was when Philly offered Iggy, vucevic, and a pick for Amare right after the Melo deal and Walsh said no. Another would be to let Melo play out his contract here if there is any chance he could waive that NTC and the knicks could get value back for him.
The Knicks should see if they can trade Melo, it should be for a fair (or better than fair) return. Melo's skill level and contract makes his a great contract as long as he's healthy. They should try to get younger guys both in FA, and the draft and look to get a headstart on being the next generation team. The worse thing the knicks could do is become a treadmill team throughout KP's youth and once Melo leaves (or is done) in 2018 be forced to spend more years tanking to get him some help.