WaltLongmire wrote:I'm going to take a guess and say that you are upset.
How do you know what set plays, if any, were part of the Knicks offense down the stretch.
Guys were not looking for KP. He was wide open on numerous occasions and was not passed to. Simple as that.
That is not on Fisher, IMO. In the heat of battle they were not making good decisions. KP had the 3 down tonight, but they only seemed to look for him in the post for most of the second half.
Guys on the court have to figure see who has the best shot to score and also consider how a player has been doing in a particular game.
Bad game for AA, who must have felt the need to compensate for Anthony's absence.
Fisher can't be on the court and on the bench at the same time. Was he a good coach when KP got a lot of looks in the first half and period 3...or do you give all the credit to the players for the good stuff you saw, and only blame Fisher for the bad play?
Yes I'm upset.. But why can't we have a successful inbound play, why is our rotation so random,why didn't the coach call plays for KP down the stretch of the fourth .or why call timeouts midway through shot clocks? Why did we go iso AA, fisher is the guy calling for that on the sideline? Why didn't fish demand to get KP the ball in the 4th? Why is he not playing Williams more when Williams was having a great game ? Why play your worst defender 18 of the first 24 minutes of the game.
This game was gift wrapped for us and I feel if the coach.
.sucessfully executed a inbound play
. Told his team to get the ball to KP in the fourth
. Played d will who was having a great game in the forth during crunch time
. Didn't play Jose during crunch time
. Didn't call for Iso AA vs their best defender in crunch time
We would have and should have won this game ..
We need a coach who knows how to coach close games to victory..