Panos wrote:Mike D just hit bottom.

Tyrone Lue gets has a $6.5 mil salary over 4 years as David Blatts top deputy dog in Clev.
Lawrence Frank got a 6 year, 6mil salary to be Kidds whipping post in Brooklyn and he was gone after a half a season. Still gets paid.

So you think after making $24 mil in NY, 10 mil in two seasons in LA, he is really on the Skids?

I'd have to think he is getting 1.5mil and at age 64 maybe he don't have to deal with a lot of the garbage that goes with head coach.

One might even say he is a coaching junkie and just flat out enjoys it. He has been a part of the USA basketball program for years and is well regarded and respected.

If this is hitting rock bottom, I'd say its not a bad gig at all. He gets to coach and teach young guys and be part of an organization that is stepping up and making a commitment.

Nalod wrote:

Panos wrote:Mike D just hit bottom.

Tyrone Lue gets has a $6.5 mil salary over 4 years as David Blatts top deputy dog in Clev.
Lawrence Frank got a 6 year, 6mil salary to be Kidds whipping post in Brooklyn and he was gone after a half a season. Still gets paid.

So you think after making $24 mil in NY, 10 mil in two seasons in LA, he is really on the Skids?

I'd have to think he is getting 1.5mil and at age 64 maybe he don't have to deal with a lot of the garbage that goes with head coach.

One might even say he is a coaching junkie and just flat out enjoys it. He has been a part of the USA basketball program for years and is well regarded and respected.

If this is hitting rock bottom, I'd say its not a bad gig at all. He gets to coach and teach young guys and be part of an organization that is stepping up and making a commitment.

I'm not talking financially. I'm talking about having once been considered one of the best head coaches in the league, now an assistant for a team going 1-81 this year.

Panos wrote:

Nalod wrote:

Panos wrote:Mike D just hit bottom.

Tyrone Lue gets has a $6.5 mil salary over 4 years as David Blatts top deputy dog in Clev.
Lawrence Frank got a 6 year, 6mil salary to be Kidds whipping post in Brooklyn and he was gone after a half a season. Still gets paid.

So you think after making $24 mil in NY, 10 mil in two seasons in LA, he is really on the Skids?

I'd have to think he is getting 1.5mil and at age 64 maybe he don't have to deal with a lot of the garbage that goes with head coach.

One might even say he is a coaching junkie and just flat out enjoys it. He has been a part of the USA basketball program for years and is well regarded and respected.

If this is hitting rock bottom, I'd say its not a bad gig at all. He gets to coach and teach young guys and be part of an organization that is stepping up and making a commitment.

I'm not talking financially. I'm talking about having once been considered one of the best head coaches in the league, now an assistant for a team going 1-81 this year.

No where to go but up from here, so its not like he is brow-beaten on the team. That's the thing at age 64 and financially set does he chase the money or a gig? Was he even really putting himself out there for a head coaching gig. He is tight with Collangelo from PHX and Team USA. The Knick gig changed on him with Walsh was outed and the Laker gig had a ton of potential but injuries just did not pan out.

He is considered one of the best offensive coach's. At least Koach K things so.

I don't think taking a gig like that is all that terrible if he has coaching in his blood.

franco12 wrote:

VDesai wrote:Basically the entire league has shifted over to D'Antoni ball. If we had gotten Steph Curry instead of Jordan Hill, can you imagine how different things could have been? Biggest mistake we made was not trading up to ensure we get him - you had the perfect player for the system right there in front of you.

we didn't need to trade up as much as tank the right way that year.

That, or keep their mouths shut about wanting him.

Now, had we landed Curry, I am sure we would have ruined his career by asking him to do something he wasn't capable of, or traded him.

Without mentioning names, but somebody would've created a thread after every bad shooting game by Steph, saying PG's should pass the ball more than shoot. They will find about 10 SG's in the D league or college that can shoot to play next to Steph. Meanwhile, Steph would've lost his confidence due to the NY media hounding him about if he's a SG or a PG......Whats his position? How are you going to guard Russell Westbrook and D Rose........

But in GS, he was able to blossom and spread his wings a little.....and not be confined to fan and media expectations.

blkexec wrote:

franco12 wrote:

VDesai wrote:Basically the entire league has shifted over to D'Antoni ball. If we had gotten Steph Curry instead of Jordan Hill, can you imagine how different things could have been? Biggest mistake we made was not trading up to ensure we get him - you had the perfect player for the system right there in front of you.

we didn't need to trade up as much as tank the right way that year.

That, or keep their mouths shut about wanting him.

Now, had we landed Curry, I am sure we would have ruined his career by asking him to do something he wasn't capable of, or traded him.

Without mentioning names, but somebody would've created a thread after every bad shooting game by Steph, saying PG's should pass the ball more than shoot. They will find about 10 SG's in the D league or college that can shoot to play next to Steph. Meanwhile, Steph would've lost his confidence due to the NY media hounding him about if he's a SG or a PG......Whats his position? How are you going to guard Russell Westbrook and D Rose........

But in GS, he was able to blossom and spread his wings a little.....and not be confined to fan and media expectations.

Steph and Amare under MDA would have been a dream

knicks1248 wrote:

blkexec wrote:

franco12 wrote:

VDesai wrote:Basically the entire league has shifted over to D'Antoni ball. If we had gotten Steph Curry instead of Jordan Hill, can you imagine how different things could have been? Biggest mistake we made was not trading up to ensure we get him - you had the perfect player for the system right there in front of you.

we didn't need to trade up as much as tank the right way that year.

That, or keep their mouths shut about wanting him.

Now, had we landed Curry, I am sure we would have ruined his career by asking him to do something he wasn't capable of, or traded him.

Without mentioning names, but somebody would've created a thread after every bad shooting game by Steph, saying PG's should pass the ball more than shoot. They will find about 10 SG's in the D league or college that can shoot to play next to Steph. Meanwhile, Steph would've lost his confidence due to the NY media hounding him about if he's a SG or a PG......Whats his position? How are you going to guard Russell Westbrook and D Rose........

But in GS, he was able to blossom and spread his wings a little.....and not be confined to fan and media expectations.

Steph and Amare under MDA would have been a dream

Steph would've extended Amare's career.....Once Amare tried to change his game, due to Melo's arrival, all the injuries started to happen. One thing about injuries, they usually occurr when you change your normal activities.....Which was the case for me, and so many others. Amare would've turned back the clock to his Steve Nash days. He was never a half court, ground and pound type of player. That Steph pick impacted the knicks more than people think. And to be honest, most had the same feelings when Russell was picked ahead of us. Good thing LA jumped the gun. Russell had 2 pts last night off the bench. He's a classic case of what happens to a confident player when the wrong team drafts you.