[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

How does the team match up against other eastern teams?
Author Thread
shinmen
Posts: 20366
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2015
Member: #6029
France
9/18/2015  7:10 AM    LAST EDITED: 9/18/2015  7:18 AM
Here are my thoughts on how the knicks can match up against other eastern teams. I expect O Quinn at PF and Calderon in the starting line up. Other positions are obvious.
I didn't factor injuries, chemistry, fatigue from back to back games and road trips which are obviously extremely importants but that I can't assess.

What I can extract from my thoughts is that last year, we were at a total disadvantage at the center position. Now with Lopez, there are no more free pass for the opponent. The other thing is that Calderon should not start. He will get destroyed against most teams. Galloway at the beginning of the season and then Grant later on should start on defense alone. I see Calderon flourish here with the same role as Kidd and Prig 3 seasons ago as a 3 pt shooter and facilitator shooting guard comming from the bench.

MIL 4 games
C: I think Lopez can absolutely hold his ground against monroe. Verdict : Tie
PF: I don't know if who are they gonna start. If Parker => Verdict : Tie
SF: Middleton will guard Melo whatever his position. He is a good defender. Melo will be less efficient but will come out on top. Verdict: NYK
SG: Antetokounmpo against Afflalo should be an interesting match up. Verdict: Tie
PG: MCW against Calderon will get by him all night long. Verdict: MIL
Bench: They have a nice bench but so do we. I'm probably a bit biased but I would say slight advantage for NYK
Predictions: 2 wins out of 4


ATL 4 games
PF/C : Our interior presence should match up ok despite being a bit less quick than atlanta front court. Verdict: ATL
SG: Afflalo can cover Korver. Verdict: Tie
SF: There won't be anyone except maybe sefolosha to cover melo this year. Verdict: NYK
PG: Teague is match up nightmare against calderon. Schröder as well. Verdict: ATL
Bench: I don't know very well atlanta's bench but I would say advantage NYK
Predictions: 1 win out of 4


WAS 3 games
PF/C: Our front court should hold their ground against theirs. Verdict: Tie
SF: Melo will eat up Dudley. Verdict: NYK
SG: Beal against Afflalo will be a tough match up. Verdict: WAS (slight advantage)
PG: Wall will have a career night against Calderon. Verdict: WAS
Bench: Verdict: NYK
Predictions: 1 wins out of 3


CLE 4 games
C: Lopez vs Mozgov. Verdict: Tie
PF: O quinn wil have his hands full with K Love. Verdict: CLE
SF: I think (don't go for the throat please ;)) James will decline a lot faster than Melo barring injuries but Lebron is still the better player by far. Verdict: CLE
SG: Afflalo vs Shumpert. Verdict: Afflalo
PG: Irving is gonna crush Calderon, Grant and Galloway. Verdict: CLE
Bench: They paid a fortune to have a deep bench. Verdict: CLE
Predictions: 0 win


TOR 4 games
C: I'm not impressed with Valanciunas. He's gifted offensively but that's it. Verdict: NYK(slight advantage)
PF: I think they're gonna start Carrol at 4, maybe scola. If Carrol Verdict: TOR
SF: Terrence ross would match up against Melo. Melo all day. Verdict: NYK
SG: DeRozan will make Afflalo earn his payday. Verdict: TOR
PG: Verdict : TOR
Bench: I would have loved Joseph in a NYK jersey. Verdict: NYK
Predictions: 2 out of 2


CHA 4 games
C: Jefferson will make Lopez work hard. Verdict: CHA(slight advantage)
PF: Kaminsky will start? If so O Quinn has the advantage with experience alone. Verdict: NYK
SF: . Melo is really tough to guard. Verdict: NYK
SG: Batum is not a typical SG but who else is fitted for the job? I love Batum for his all around game and it's not because i'm french but he struggles to score consistently. Verdict: Tie
PG: Kemba walker is not a good shooter but he's quick. The nemesis feature of Calderon. Verdict: CHA
Bench: They don't have much except for Lin. Verdict: NYK
Predictions: 3 wins out of 4


MIA 4 games
C: I'm not sold on Whiteside. He played well for half a season and some are seeing him as the next Shaq or something. Verdict: Tie
PF: Bosh all day. Verdict: MIA
SF: Deng is still tired from his days in Chicago. Melo will hurt him. Verdict: NYK
SG: Wade is still a good player but on his last legs. Afflalo can guard him. Verdict: Tie
PG: Calderon will sweat his *** off running after Dragic. Verdict: MIA
Bench: They have Chalmers, Winslow, Amare, Mc Roberts, Green. We have KP, Grant, Seraphin, DK. Honestly I pick NYK.
Predictions: 2 out of 2


ORL 3 games
C: Vucevic is a good rebounder and scorer but Lopez is a good rebounder and defender. Verdict: Tie
PF: I think tey start Frye. If O Quinn can keep up with him moving on the perimeter. Verdict: Tie
SF: Melo will school Harris. Verdict: NYK
SG: Oladipo is a nice upcoming player but Afflalo has experience on his side. Verdict: NYK
PG: I d'ont know Payton's game very much. I would say Tie
Bench: They have a young and talented bench. Verdict: Tie
Predictions: 2 out of 1


PHI 4 games
C: Okafor is impressive on the block but so is Duncan, Monroe, Randolph Jefferson and Lopez has played against all of them. Verdict: NYK
PF: Noel is a beast on defense. If O Quinn pound on him, he 'll suffer. Verdict: Tie
SF: No debate. Verdict: NYK
SG: Verdict: NYK
PG: Calderon will score but will get scored on. Verdict : Tie
Bench: NYK
Predictions: 4 out of 4


BKN 4 games
C: Interesting trash talking is to be expected between the 2 twins. Verdict: BKN(slight advantage)
PF: I think Young will top O Quinn. Verdict: BKN(slight advantage)
SF: Melo is a younger, better version than Johnson. Verdict: NYK
SG: Ellington is the only true SG. I don't know anything about him. Verdict: let's say NYK
PG: Jack is a nice back up PG. Calderon is a nice back up SG/PG. Verdict: Tie
Bench: NYK
Predictions: 3 out of 4


CHI 4 games
C: Noah is a better rebounder and defender than Lopez. Verdict: CHI
PF: Gasol had a terrific season last year. Even if he does not repeat last season performance, he's better than any PF we have. Verdict: CHI
SF: Mike dunleavy is good serviceable player but Melo is a top scorer and doesn't have to be an elite defender to guard Dunleavy. Verdict: NYK
SG: Afflalo will struggle mightily against Butler. Verdict: CHI
PG: D Rose is unequivocally gonna run by Calderon every possession. Verdict: CHI
Bench: Chicago has a good bench with youth and vets. Our bench is more athletic. Maybe a slight advantage for NYK
Predictions : 1 out 4


BOS 4 games
C: David lee against Lopez. Offense against Defense. Verdict: Tie
PF: I would think Sullinger is better than O Quinn for now. Verdict: BOS
SF: Crowder is a good defender and an improving 3 pt shooter if I recall what I read. Melo can guard a 3 pt shooter if he doesn't slack and can score on anybody. Verdict: NYK
SG: Turner is not a good defender and won't be smiling much when he's gonna be guarded by Afflalo. Verdict: NYK
PG: Smart is a quick PG that will pass by Calderon. Verdict : BOS
Bench: Some nice bench players on both sides. Verdict: NYK
Predictions: 3 out of 4


DET 3 games
C: Drummond is a beast physically. Verdict: DET
PF: IT depends if O Quinn is quick enough to guard stretch 4 effectively. Verdict: Tie
SF: If Johnson starts, Melo will have a field day. Verdict: NYK
SG: Pope is only a shooter? Afflalo will come out on top. Verdict: NYK
PG: Detroit is stacked on the PG position. With Jackson and Jennings, they are gonna have a good night against us. Verdict: DET
Bench: their bench doesn't seem very deep except for Jennings. Verdict: NYK
Predictions: 2 out of 3


IND 3 games
C: Bird said he wanted Georges to start af pf. Myles Turner seemed like a good find during SL but SL is no NBA grown up players. Verdict: NYK
PF: Georges will guard Melo. Who 's gonna guard O Quinn. How O Quinn can guard Georges. Verdict: I don't know
SF: Solomon Hill? Melo will be guarded by Georges. Verdict: Tie
SG: Monta Ellis is an offense specialist. I have faith in Afflalo to make him shoot bricks. Verdict: NYK
PG: Hill found himself confident on offense last year. If he can reiterate his performance, verdict: IND
Bench: Their bench is not very deep. Verdict: NYK
Predictions: 2 out of 3

AUTOADVERT
Sangfroid
Posts: 24681
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/7/2009
Member: #2784

9/18/2015  11:09 AM
From your analysis, the point guard position looks like our Achilles heel. Hopefully, Grant or Galloway emerges in training camp or early in the season, to address these ills.
"We are playing a game. We are playing at not playing a game..."
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/18/2015  11:40 AM
It would be a mistake IMO to assume that Jose would be such a major detriment. For one thing he's not the only PG we have and secondly we have a lot more rim protection now. Jose was just as bad defensively with Dallas and they won 50 games and took San Antonio to 7 games. The focus on Jose is a bit overstated IMO. It's a legit concern but there's a way to deal with that.

Phil has talked about using pressure and traps on the opposing PG and also using some zone defense this year. We have to see how it is applied but using different tactics could mitigate some of the defensive weakness of Jose.

Cartman718
Posts: 29069
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/12/2007
Member: #1694

9/18/2015  11:42 AM
28 wins against east. how many against west @ shinmen?
Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

9/18/2015  11:44 AM
nixluva wrote:It would be a mistake IMO to assume that Jose would be such a major detriment. For one thing he's not the only PG we have and secondly we have a lot more rim protection now. Jose was just as bad defensively with Dallas and they won 50 games and took San Antonio to 7 games. The focus on Jose is a bit overstated IMO. It's a legit concern but there's a way to deal with that.

Phil has talked about using pressure and traps on the opposing PG and also using some zone defense this year. We have to see how it is applied but using different tactics could mitigate some of the defensive weakness of Jose.

i think the concern about jose has been pretty fair considering his age, cap hit, and injuries. Look i want him to be better but getting rid of that salary will help get more talent next summer
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

9/18/2015  11:49 AM    LAST EDITED: 9/18/2015  11:50 AM
So the only teams better than us are Cleveland, Chicago, Wash and ATL?..We are even with Miami, Milwaukee and Toronto?
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

9/18/2015  12:23 PM
holfresh wrote:So the only teams better than us are Cleveland, Chicago, Wash and ATL?..We are even with Miami, Milwaukee and Toronto?
i would rank the bucks and raptors ahead of us. Miami is kind of a mystery they may be pretty good or depending on health they could struggle
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/18/2015  1:06 PM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
nixluva wrote:It would be a mistake IMO to assume that Jose would be such a major detriment. For one thing he's not the only PG we have and secondly we have a lot more rim protection now. Jose was just as bad defensively with Dallas and they won 50 games and took San Antonio to 7 games. The focus on Jose is a bit overstated IMO. It's a legit concern but there's a way to deal with that.

Phil has talked about using pressure and traps on the opposing PG and also using some zone defense this year. We have to see how it is applied but using different tactics could mitigate some of the defensive weakness of Jose.

i think the concern about jose has been pretty fair considering his age, cap hit, and injuries. Look i want him to be better but getting rid of that salary will help get more talent next summer

Of course Jose is a liability on D. I think we are overlooking the presence of Jerian, Gallo and Afflalo tho. Jose doesn't have to be a starter nor play a ton of minutes. For all we know he could be coming off the bench. It's not going to be a situation where we just leave Jose out there to get killed when we have younger and better defenders on the roster. Also this is very much going to be about TEAM defense and not just Jose out on an Island all the time. That's why I brought up the use of pressure, traps and zones.

How do you think Dallas was able to win games with Jose playing major minutes and starting? He's not any slower than he was then. He was never really fast to begin with. Yet the Mavs went 49-33 with Jose playing 30 mpg and starting 81 games!!! Last year without Jose they one 1 more game but only won 1 playoff game as opposed to 3 wins with Jose. Doesn't seem like Jose was the limiting factor that some want to make him out to be.

StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

9/18/2015  1:12 PM
nixluva wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
nixluva wrote:It would be a mistake IMO to assume that Jose would be such a major detriment. For one thing he's not the only PG we have and secondly we have a lot more rim protection now. Jose was just as bad defensively with Dallas and they won 50 games and took San Antonio to 7 games. The focus on Jose is a bit overstated IMO. It's a legit concern but there's a way to deal with that.

Phil has talked about using pressure and traps on the opposing PG and also using some zone defense this year. We have to see how it is applied but using different tactics could mitigate some of the defensive weakness of Jose.

i think the concern about jose has been pretty fair considering his age, cap hit, and injuries. Look i want him to be better but getting rid of that salary will help get more talent next summer

Of course Jose is a liability on D. I think we are overlooking the presence of Jerian, Gallo and Afflalo tho. Jose doesn't have to be a starter nor play a ton of minutes. For all we know he could be coming off the bench. It's not going to be a situation where we just leave Jose out there to get killed when we have younger and better defenders on the roster. Also this is very much going to be about TEAM defense and not just Jose out on an Island all the time. That's why I brought up the use of pressure, traps and zones.

How do you think Dallas was able to win games with Jose playing major minutes and starting? He's not any slower than he was then. He was never really fast to begin with. Yet the Mavs went 49-33 with Jose playing 30 mpg and starting 81 games!!! Last year without Jose they one 1 more game but only won 1 playoff game as opposed to 3 wins with Jose. Doesn't seem like Jose was the limiting factor that some want to make him out to be.

my issue is his contract. If it was a expiring i wouldnt be too worried. I agree him coming off the bench might help him and the knics much more. Im also a big grant fan and want him to start even if he has some struggles at first
blkexec
Posts: 28347
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
9/18/2015  1:14 PM
nixluva wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
nixluva wrote:It would be a mistake IMO to assume that Jose would be such a major detriment. For one thing he's not the only PG we have and secondly we have a lot more rim protection now. Jose was just as bad defensively with Dallas and they won 50 games and took San Antonio to 7 games. The focus on Jose is a bit overstated IMO. It's a legit concern but there's a way to deal with that.

Phil has talked about using pressure and traps on the opposing PG and also using some zone defense this year. We have to see how it is applied but using different tactics could mitigate some of the defensive weakness of Jose.

i think the concern about jose has been pretty fair considering his age, cap hit, and injuries. Look i want him to be better but getting rid of that salary will help get more talent next summer

Of course Jose is a liability on D. I think we are overlooking the presence of Jerian, Gallo and Afflalo tho. Jose doesn't have to be a starter nor play a ton of minutes. For all we know he could be coming off the bench. It's not going to be a situation where we just leave Jose out there to get killed when we have younger and better defenders on the roster. Also this is very much going to be about TEAM defense and not just Jose out on an Island all the time. That's why I brought up the use of pressure, traps and zones.

How do you think Dallas was able to win games with Jose playing major minutes and starting? He's not any slower than he was then. He was never really fast to begin with. Yet the Mavs went 49-33 with Jose playing 30 mpg and starting 81 games!!! Last year without Jose they one 1 more game but only won 1 playoff game as opposed to 3 wins with Jose. Doesn't seem like Jose was the limiting factor that some want to make him out to be.

I think everybody is confused and brain washed by Mike Woodson's ISO system. His system was all about idividual talent. Phil / Fishers system is about team defense. Also, during Mike Woodson, we never had a healthy rim protector. Even when Chandler was healthy, he was on an island. Now we have KP, and other rugged PF's....along with Lopez to protect the paint. So Jose's defense will not be as much of an impact as before. Along with the young guys and perimeter defenders in Galo, Jerian, Aflalo and the Greek.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

9/18/2015  1:29 PM
blkexec wrote:
nixluva wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
nixluva wrote:It would be a mistake IMO to assume that Jose would be such a major detriment. For one thing he's not the only PG we have and secondly we have a lot more rim protection now. Jose was just as bad defensively with Dallas and they won 50 games and took San Antonio to 7 games. The focus on Jose is a bit overstated IMO. It's a legit concern but there's a way to deal with that.

Phil has talked about using pressure and traps on the opposing PG and also using some zone defense this year. We have to see how it is applied but using different tactics could mitigate some of the defensive weakness of Jose.

i think the concern about jose has been pretty fair considering his age, cap hit, and injuries. Look i want him to be better but getting rid of that salary will help get more talent next summer

Of course Jose is a liability on D. I think we are overlooking the presence of Jerian, Gallo and Afflalo tho. Jose doesn't have to be a starter nor play a ton of minutes. For all we know he could be coming off the bench. It's not going to be a situation where we just leave Jose out there to get killed when we have younger and better defenders on the roster. Also this is very much going to be about TEAM defense and not just Jose out on an Island all the time. That's why I brought up the use of pressure, traps and zones.

How do you think Dallas was able to win games with Jose playing major minutes and starting? He's not any slower than he was then. He was never really fast to begin with. Yet the Mavs went 49-33 with Jose playing 30 mpg and starting 81 games!!! Last year without Jose they one 1 more game but only won 1 playoff game as opposed to 3 wins with Jose. Doesn't seem like Jose was the limiting factor that some want to make him out to be.

I think everybody is confused and brain washed by Mike Woodson's ISO system. His system was all about idividual talent. Phil / Fishers system is about team defense. Also, during Mike Woodson, we never had a healthy rim protector. Even when Chandler was healthy, he was on an island. Now we have KP, and other rugged PF's....along with Lopez to protect the paint. So Jose's defense will not be as much of an impact as before. Along with the young guys and perimeter defenders in Galo, Jerian, Aflalo and the Greek.

who is brainwashed? Look i was never a woodson fan BUT lets be fair we were more successful in his tenure than anybody else since van gundy. Its not like fans are being negative. Most are happy with the draft and the free agents. However other teams in the east have also had a good offseason. Nothing wrong with having good feelings about the knicks but also trying to be objective. Ive felt 35-37 wins is probably a fair total and its a good first step in rebuilding the knicks
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/18/2015  1:35 PM
blkexec wrote:
nixluva wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
nixluva wrote:It would be a mistake IMO to assume that Jose would be such a major detriment. For one thing he's not the only PG we have and secondly we have a lot more rim protection now. Jose was just as bad defensively with Dallas and they won 50 games and took San Antonio to 7 games. The focus on Jose is a bit overstated IMO. It's a legit concern but there's a way to deal with that.

Phil has talked about using pressure and traps on the opposing PG and also using some zone defense this year. We have to see how it is applied but using different tactics could mitigate some of the defensive weakness of Jose.

i think the concern about jose has been pretty fair considering his age, cap hit, and injuries. Look i want him to be better but getting rid of that salary will help get more talent next summer

Of course Jose is a liability on D. I think we are overlooking the presence of Jerian, Gallo and Afflalo tho. Jose doesn't have to be a starter nor play a ton of minutes. For all we know he could be coming off the bench. It's not going to be a situation where we just leave Jose out there to get killed when we have younger and better defenders on the roster. Also this is very much going to be about TEAM defense and not just Jose out on an Island all the time. That's why I brought up the use of pressure, traps and zones.

How do you think Dallas was able to win games with Jose playing major minutes and starting? He's not any slower than he was then. He was never really fast to begin with. Yet the Mavs went 49-33 with Jose playing 30 mpg and starting 81 games!!! Last year without Jose they one 1 more game but only won 1 playoff game as opposed to 3 wins with Jose. Doesn't seem like Jose was the limiting factor that some want to make him out to be.

I think everybody is confused and brain washed by Mike Woodson's ISO system. His system was all about idividual talent. Phil / Fishers system is about team defense. Also, during Mike Woodson, we never had a healthy rim protector. Even when Chandler was healthy, he was on an island. Now we have KP, and other rugged PF's....along with Lopez to protect the paint. So Jose's defense will not be as much of an impact as before. Along with the young guys and perimeter defenders in Galo, Jerian, Aflalo and the Greek.

My personal starting lineup is Melo, Jerian, Afflalo, RoLo and KP. I think that group has the most offense and defense. I think that is the future SL of the team right there. It may not happen on opening night but I do think eventually that is where the Knicks will end up. Jerian provides that PG play we need on both ends. He can defend, make plays and also get to the basket. KP adds length at the rim but also on offense he can space the floor as well. It's his ability to score from anywhere on the floor that will make it hard for teams to defend the Knicks. It puts 4 shooters on the floor with RoLo near the basket where he can score of dump offs or offensive rebounds, which is his specialty.

shinmen
Posts: 20366
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2015
Member: #6029
France
9/18/2015  5:31 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/18/2015  5:36 PM
I would be ecstatic if Jose was to come of the bench. He would be an asset if he was put in this kind of role. Actually I'm not worried about penetration and rim protection. We have indeed improved a lot but we were among the last on 3pt defense and only Afflalo, Gallo and Grant are capable (not great) on the perimeter defense.
@Cartman. I think a dozen wins out of 30 seems fair. We would land in the forecasted 40 wins as I and a many agree the knicks can achieve.

I read here and there that Tor, Mil, Bos, etc are better than us. My idea for this post was to look at each team. Of course they have very good players but the knicks have nothing to be ashamed of. They are definitely not the same team as last year. I don't feel like many team in the east are that good. 2 years ago, Charlotte had a very good defense, the next they were clearly not as good. Each year is different and injuries and chemistry are crucial components of a team success.

shinmen
Posts: 20366
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2015
Member: #6029
France
9/18/2015  5:50 PM
nixluva wrote:
blkexec wrote:
nixluva wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
nixluva wrote:It would be a mistake IMO to assume that Jose would be such a major detriment. For one thing he's not the only PG we have and secondly we have a lot more rim protection now. Jose was just as bad defensively with Dallas and they won 50 games and took San Antonio to 7 games. The focus on Jose is a bit overstated IMO. It's a legit concern but there's a way to deal with that.

Phil has talked about using pressure and traps on the opposing PG and also using some zone defense this year. We have to see how it is applied but using different tactics could mitigate some of the defensive weakness of Jose.

i think the concern about jose has been pretty fair considering his age, cap hit, and injuries. Look i want him to be better but getting rid of that salary will help get more talent next summer

Of course Jose is a liability on D. I think we are overlooking the presence of Jerian, Gallo and Afflalo tho. Jose doesn't have to be a starter nor play a ton of minutes. For all we know he could be coming off the bench. It's not going to be a situation where we just leave Jose out there to get killed when we have younger and better defenders on the roster. Also this is very much going to be about TEAM defense and not just Jose out on an Island all the time. That's why I brought up the use of pressure, traps and zones.

How do you think Dallas was able to win games with Jose playing major minutes and starting? He's not any slower than he was then. He was never really fast to begin with. Yet the Mavs went 49-33 with Jose playing 30 mpg and starting 81 games!!! Last year without Jose they one 1 more game but only won 1 playoff game as opposed to 3 wins with Jose. Doesn't seem like Jose was the limiting factor that some want to make him out to be.

I think everybody is confused and brain washed by Mike Woodson's ISO system. His system was all about idividual talent. Phil / Fishers system is about team defense. Also, during Mike Woodson, we never had a healthy rim protector. Even when Chandler was healthy, he was on an island. Now we have KP, and other rugged PF's....along with Lopez to protect the paint. So Jose's defense will not be as much of an impact as before. Along with the young guys and perimeter defenders in Galo, Jerian, Aflalo and the Greek.

My personal starting lineup is Melo, Jerian, Afflalo, RoLo and KP. I think that group has the most offense and defense. I think that is the future SL of the team right there. It may not happen on opening night but I do think eventually that is where the Knicks will end up. Jerian provides that PG play we need on both ends. He can defend, make plays and also get to the basket. KP adds length at the rim but also on offense he can space the floor as well. It's his ability to score from anywhere on the floor that will make it hard for teams to defend the Knicks. It puts 4 shooters on the floor with RoLo near the basket where he can score of dump offs or offensive rebounds, which is his specialty.

That starting 5 would be exciting to see and root for. The team would well balanced. However, I feel like we (I do it too) overlook too often that our rookies have not played a single game in NBA. I have no doubt that both Jerian and KP will be at least very good players. However, when last year Jerian was one the best PG in the nation, this year he's maybe the 30th best PG in the league. The strengh, speed needed to play in the big league is no joke. Experience is an important factor and only time can help. That's why however talented both are, they will need to adjust to the game. That's why they should not start at the beginning of the season.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/18/2015  6:19 PM
shinmen wrote:
nixluva wrote:
blkexec wrote:
nixluva wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
nixluva wrote:It would be a mistake IMO to assume that Jose would be such a major detriment. For one thing he's not the only PG we have and secondly we have a lot more rim protection now. Jose was just as bad defensively with Dallas and they won 50 games and took San Antonio to 7 games. The focus on Jose is a bit overstated IMO. It's a legit concern but there's a way to deal with that.

Phil has talked about using pressure and traps on the opposing PG and also using some zone defense this year. We have to see how it is applied but using different tactics could mitigate some of the defensive weakness of Jose.

i think the concern about jose has been pretty fair considering his age, cap hit, and injuries. Look i want him to be better but getting rid of that salary will help get more talent next summer

Of course Jose is a liability on D. I think we are overlooking the presence of Jerian, Gallo and Afflalo tho. Jose doesn't have to be a starter nor play a ton of minutes. For all we know he could be coming off the bench. It's not going to be a situation where we just leave Jose out there to get killed when we have younger and better defenders on the roster. Also this is very much going to be about TEAM defense and not just Jose out on an Island all the time. That's why I brought up the use of pressure, traps and zones.

How do you think Dallas was able to win games with Jose playing major minutes and starting? He's not any slower than he was then. He was never really fast to begin with. Yet the Mavs went 49-33 with Jose playing 30 mpg and starting 81 games!!! Last year without Jose they one 1 more game but only won 1 playoff game as opposed to 3 wins with Jose. Doesn't seem like Jose was the limiting factor that some want to make him out to be.

I think everybody is confused and brain washed by Mike Woodson's ISO system. His system was all about idividual talent. Phil / Fishers system is about team defense. Also, during Mike Woodson, we never had a healthy rim protector. Even when Chandler was healthy, he was on an island. Now we have KP, and other rugged PF's....along with Lopez to protect the paint. So Jose's defense will not be as much of an impact as before. Along with the young guys and perimeter defenders in Galo, Jerian, Aflalo and the Greek.

My personal starting lineup is Melo, Jerian, Afflalo, RoLo and KP. I think that group has the most offense and defense. I think that is the future SL of the team right there. It may not happen on opening night but I do think eventually that is where the Knicks will end up. Jerian provides that PG play we need on both ends. He can defend, make plays and also get to the basket. KP adds length at the rim but also on offense he can space the floor as well. It's his ability to score from anywhere on the floor that will make it hard for teams to defend the Knicks. It puts 4 shooters on the floor with RoLo near the basket where he can score of dump offs or offensive rebounds, which is his specialty.

That starting 5 would be exciting to see and root for. The team would well balanced. However, I feel like we (I do it too) overlook too often that our rookies have not played a single game in NBA. I have no doubt that both Jerian and KP will be at least very good players. However, when last year Jerian was one the best PG in the nation, this year he's maybe the 30th best PG in the league. The strengh, speed needed to play in the big league is no joke. Experience is an important factor and only time can help. That's why however talented both are, they will need to adjust to the game. That's why they should not start at the beginning of the season.


We'll have to see how they both look in pre season. Of course Jerian isn't going to come in and destroy the league. He won't have to do anything like that for this team to be successful. Unlike most NBA rookie PG's Jerian is a 5 yr college player. He's more mature than your typical NBA rookie PG. He's also a more developed player overall. I actually think he'd be just fine starting for this team. He won't have to carry the action in this system anyway. His strengths as a college player are pretty much what he's gonna be asked to do in NY but he won't have to dominate the ball in this system. That takes tremendous pressure off of him. He'll have to play off the ball more than he did in college which is actually another of his strengths.

KP like all rookies will have to adjust to the NBA level but I don't think he's gonna have that much trouble. He was already playing pro ball and he understands a lot about the game already. At least enough to be able to play meaningful minutes. Phil is looking for 20-25 MPG. That suggests that he's not some kid that will be locked on the bench. Some kids just know how to play and Jerian and KP IMO are those kind of kids. They aren't fully developed as they will be but they can do enough now to play a role and possibly start.

arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
9/18/2015  11:37 PM
Cartman718 wrote:28 wins against east. how many against west @ shinmen?

Prob 14 at best... making it 42...
This is not even optimistic but pure fantasy...

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

9/19/2015  6:38 AM
Giannis is the sf for the bucks and he is suspended for the first game. I don't think Parker will play either so this should be a way to get off to a good start.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
9/19/2015  12:05 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:Giannis is the sf for the bucks and he is suspended for the first game. I don't think Parker will play either so this should be a way to get off to a good start.

That would be great for the team and Fisher.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/19/2015  1:28 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:Giannis is the sf for the bucks and he is suspended for the first game. I don't think Parker will play either so this should be a way to get off to a good start.

That would be great for the team and Fisher.

One game won't do it as we learned last year. I'm hoping for a good opening 10 games. The better they look over that early 10 game stretch it can set up the next 10 games and their confidence for the season. It won't be easy. If they put their focus on D and the boards they should be very competitive.

StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

9/19/2015  1:32 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/19/2015  1:33 PM
nixluva wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:Giannis is the sf for the bucks and he is suspended for the first game. I don't think Parker will play either so this should be a way to get off to a good start.

That would be great for the team and Fisher.

One game won't do it as we learned last year. I'm hoping for a good opening 10 games. The better they look over that early 10 game stretch it can set up the next 10 games and their confidence for the season. It won't be easy. If they put their focus on D and the boards they should be very competitive.

they have a tough stretch to begin with. I think we will at least double our win total from last year which is a good first step. Its gonna take time for all the new pieces to gel and the rookies to develop. Still im excited for this season
How does the team match up against other eastern teams?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy