Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
![]() Herring wrote about this the other day also.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-knicks-triangle-offense-is-starting-to-change-shape-1436909978 I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/26/2005 Member: #858 Germany |
![]() nixluva wrote:This is a WAY overblown adjustment. The changes started last year and it doesn't mean they're moving away from the Triangle. The problem was that players were so focused on trying to run the Triangle Half Court set that they weren't playing basketball. The offense was never intended to be run so predictably and robotic. That was how our players chose to do it and it was clear that they needed to do something to get the players to loosen up and play faster and less predictably. It said "Knicks Are Moving Away from a pure Triangle Offense". No one said we are moving away from the triangle. The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
|
FireWoodson
Posts: 20343 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/9/2014 Member: #5899 |
![]() nixluva wrote:The problem was that players were so focused on trying to run the Triangle Half Court set that they weren't playing basketball. Perfectly said. Breen and Frazier both said something like that the other day during Summer League play. The team was tight, moves were made tentatively, they were robotic due to the Triangle offense. Very interesting to hear a criticism of The Triangle. I thought MSG management was going to cut their mics off right there and fire them live on TV. |
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
![]() FireWoodson wrote:nixluva wrote:The problem was that players were so focused on trying to run the Triangle Half Court set that they weren't playing basketball. Not a "critique" of the Triangle itself...it is essentially a critique of the guys who were playing it. Might be a subtle distiction, but you really have to read between the lines, and Jackson has also spoken about this too, by the way. He might have used the word "mechanical," or "going through the motions." EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
![]() earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:This is a WAY overblown adjustment. The changes started last year and it doesn't mean they're moving away from the Triangle. The problem was that players were so focused on trying to run the Triangle Half Court set that they weren't playing basketball. The offense was never intended to be run so predictably and robotic. That was how our players chose to do it and it was clear that they needed to do something to get the players to loosen up and play faster and less predictably. DO you even know what that means? What is the Pure Triangle Offense? Why don't you explain that to us so that we can be clear just what the Media means. I actually challenge anyone including the media to breakdown what the "Pure Triangle Offense" is. |
FireWoodson
Posts: 20343 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/9/2014 Member: #5899 |
![]() WaltLongmire wrote:Not a "critique" of the Triangle itself...it is essentially a critique of the guys who were playing it. No, not a subtle distinction at all. Rather a correct distinction. It was the players on our team - the Shumps, the JRs - rather than the system that was the main culprit for our failure last season. |
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
![]() The system di not.do the players any favor either...
The Future is Bright!
|
FireWoodson
Posts: 20343 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/9/2014 Member: #5899 |
![]() TPercy wrote:The system did not do the players any favor either... But now you are taking this to a chicken-or-the-egg scenario. Is it the system...or is it the players? One thing we clearly do know is that the system is more than capable of winning championships. Can we say the same about the players Shump and JR? |
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
![]() FireWoodson wrote:TPercy wrote:The system did not do the players any favor either... You're right! People have been judging the Triangle based on how it looked with our crappy guards running it. Funny how much better it looks with Shved or Jerian running it. It doesn't even look like the same offense to people. The media is eager to push this narrative that they're changing the Triangle, but they don't even realize that Phil has ALWAYS changed the Triangle to make use of the talent he had. He ran the system different with Pippen after he saw that he could handle the ball. He did the same things in LA making small tweaks when he had Odom. We don't have those players so we're gonna see a slightly different adjustment of the offense but it's still the Triangle. |
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
![]() FireWoodson wrote:TPercy wrote:The system did not do the players any favor either... The triangle has been ran with two HOFs when they won championships. A strict triangle gives you too many inefficient shots. The Future is Bright!
|
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
![]() Fire if I can recall correctly...we're you not one of th r ones who was really pissed about letting the two of them you and was raving about how they are now in the nba finals?
The Future is Bright!
|
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/26/2005 Member: #858 Germany |
![]() nixluva wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:This is a WAY overblown adjustment. The changes started last year and it doesn't mean they're moving away from the Triangle. The problem was that players were so focused on trying to run the Triangle Half Court set that they weren't playing basketball. The offense was never intended to be run so predictably and robotic. That was how our players chose to do it and it was clear that they needed to do something to get the players to loosen up and play faster and less predictably. As I said in the other thread, no I don't. I was taking the article at face value, so forward your concerns to the writer of the article. The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
![]() TPercy wrote:FireWoodson wrote:TPercy wrote:The system did not do the players any favor either... Man don't fall for this crap!!! This is what the media wants you to think. You don't need two HOF's in order for the offense to function efficiently. The presence of the Elite players helps when things bog down and in particular in late game situations. The offense runs just fine during the vast majority of the game. Just watching the SL team you can see that there's nothing wrong with the offense. Heck last year when Shved came on board you could see how it could work with a better guard. We upgraded our guards with Jerian and Afflalo. Hopefully that will have a positive impact and so far so good. When you have quality players the Triangle will put them in prime scoring position, they have to be able to finish the plays by making shots and not always settling for only the midrange jumpers. We won't be seeing that this year. We'll be seeing more plays at the rim as the offense is designed to do. |
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
![]() The Future is Bright!
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
![]() earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:This is a WAY overblown adjustment. The changes started last year and it doesn't mean they're moving away from the Triangle. The problem was that players were so focused on trying to run the Triangle Half Court set that they weren't playing basketball. The offense was never intended to be run so predictably and robotic. That was how our players chose to do it and it was clear that they needed to do something to get the players to loosen up and play faster and less predictably. Sorry if i'm coming off as a jerk here. I'm just so tired of the Media talking what they don't know and creating this narrative that the Triangle is somehow irrelevant. Most of these media guys have NO IDEA what the Triangle actually is beyond the obvious. They basically have no idea what they're looking at. Most people haven't spent the time to really learn what is going on in the Triangle nor how it's been adjusted over the years based on the players Phil has had. It's not always the same. Phil made it clear that Fish had the freedom to adjust the offense as he saw fit. A lot depends on the players you have and their strengths. The offense will always be tweaked to take advantage of a players strengths but they still have to have a base level of BB IQ and skills for it to work. That's why players had to go and Phil is loading the team up with more players who have the needed IQ and talents. |
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
![]() TPercy wrote: What is the point you're trying to make with this video? |
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
![]() nixluva wrote:TPercy wrote: People don't know what a pure triangle is, here it is. The Future is Bright!
|