[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Ian Bagley tweeting Knicks interested in Jason Smith @ 15-16 per
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Rookie
Posts: 27069
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 10/15/2008
Member: #2274
7/5/2015  2:22 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/5/2015  2:25 PM
This can't be right. I assume he means 15-16 Meeeellion per.
AUTOADVERT
BigRedDog
Posts: 22195
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #569
7/5/2015  2:23 PM
1.5-1.6 million?
fishmike 9/27/2024 11:00 PM Ug I hate this. The idea of Towns is great until you see what a pussy he is. Jules is a dog. DD was a flamethrower locked up cheap for 3 more years. First Leon move I hate
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/5/2015  2:23 PM
NO they're saying the Knicks are talking to Jason PER SOURCES. Not Per season.
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
7/5/2015  2:25 PM
for year 2015-2016
so here is what phil is thinking ....
callmened
Posts: 24448
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/26/2012
Member: #4234
7/5/2015  2:29 PM
sigh. lol
Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
Rookie
Posts: 27069
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 10/15/2008
Member: #2274
7/5/2015  2:30 PM
mreinman wrote:for year 2015-2016

ok, that makes sense. I can close the window now, no need to jump
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/5/2015  2:41 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/5/2015  2:42 PM
mreinman wrote:for year 2015-2016

LOL
I think you're right but what other season would they be talking about?!
Perhaps he means it's just a one year but the writing is confusing
TPercy
Posts: 28010
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2014
Member: #5748
7/5/2015  2:42 PM
Why him? I'd rather see Cole Aldrich or Kendrick Perkins than him..
The Future is Bright!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/5/2015  2:45 PM
He hit 48% of his shots from 0-3 feet. He might be the only player where a shot right under the rim is a bad shot.
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816
7/5/2015  2:46 PM
Rookie wrote:This can't be right. I assume he means 15-16 Meeeellion per.

The 2015/16 season......GEESH
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843
7/5/2015  2:59 PM
Should be better this year, as he was coming off a knee injury…no?

He will seem like a more valuable player if he is a 15MPG player.

I think I like him more than some of you, but he was put in a more prominent role last year- not one he should be in IMO.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
7/5/2015  3:05 PM
putrid putrid shot selection and horribly inefficient. Also does not play defense or rebound.

for some reason phil likes him because of how well he shoots that stupid long mid range shot.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
TPercy
Posts: 28010
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2014
Member: #5748
7/5/2015  3:08 PM
mreinman wrote:putrid putrid shot selection and horribly inefficient. Also does not play defense or rebound.

for some reason phil likes him because of how well he shoots that stupid long mid range shot.

Looked at his shot chart as well. There is not one single shot he can make above a 50% rate than the left elbow.

The Future is Bright!
GetThePipe
Posts: 20136
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/7/2013
Member: #4505
7/5/2015  3:12 PM
It seemed as if every shot he took after setting up a pick went into the basket. I remember the guy as a wizard, and when he started making the corner three oh my God.

Cole is more useful though.
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
7/5/2015  3:13 PM
TPercy wrote:
mreinman wrote:putrid putrid shot selection and horribly inefficient. Also does not play defense or rebound.

for some reason phil likes him because of how well he shoots that stupid long mid range shot.

Looked at his shot chart as well. There is not one single shot he can make above a 50% rate than the left elbow.

the fact that phil likes this guy and approves of his shot selection is to me the most alarming.

the knicks led the league be a wide margin in shots taken between 16 and 23 feet. If they lead the league in that category again, eeeeeeesh

so here is what phil is thinking ....
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/5/2015  3:20 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/5/2015  3:20 PM
mreinman wrote:
TPercy wrote:
mreinman wrote:putrid putrid shot selection and horribly inefficient. Also does not play defense or rebound.

for some reason phil likes him because of how well he shoots that stupid long mid range shot.

Looked at his shot chart as well. There is not one single shot he can make above a 50% rate than the left elbow.

the fact that phil likes this guy and approves of his shot selection is to me the most alarming.

the knicks led the league be a wide margin in shots taken between 16 and 23 feet. If they lead the league in that category again, eeeeeeesh


I think Phil is not using any of the analytics. It was probably just a coincidence that Lopez has nice advanced stats.
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
7/5/2015  3:21 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
TPercy wrote:
mreinman wrote:putrid putrid shot selection and horribly inefficient. Also does not play defense or rebound.

for some reason phil likes him because of how well he shoots that stupid long mid range shot.

Looked at his shot chart as well. There is not one single shot he can make above a 50% rate than the left elbow.

the fact that phil likes this guy and approves of his shot selection is to me the most alarming.

the knicks led the league be a wide margin in shots taken between 16 and 23 feet. If they lead the league in that category again, eeeeeeesh


I think Phil is not using any of the analytics. It was probably just a coincidence that Lopez has nice advanced stats.

it does seem that way.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
7/5/2015  3:26 PM
For 15-16 $ per hour?
Sounds about right...
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/5/2015  3:40 PM
I don't love Jason Smith, but if it's between he and Bargnani, I'd absolutely take Jason Smith.

I think he can accept and do well in a limited role, whereas Bargs cannot - he only does well when he's made the #1 option.

Also - Why would anyone think Jason Smith was getting $15M-16M??? Come on guys!

¿ △ ?
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
7/5/2015  3:43 PM
crzymdups wrote:I don't love Jason Smith, but if it's between he and Bargnani, I'd absolutely take Jason Smith.

I think he can accept and do well in a limited role, whereas Bargs cannot - he only does well when he's made the #1 option.

Also - Why would anyone think Jason Smith was getting $15M-16M??? Come on guys!

why do you think that Jason Smith will/can do well in a limited role?

so here is what phil is thinking ....
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Ian Bagley tweeting Knicks interested in Jason Smith @ 15-16 per
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy