[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Examples of players where workout videos/measurements were more indicative than in game stats?
Author Thread
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/19/2015  9:33 AM
Are there examples of guys who a) had mediocre college/international stats but b) looked amazing in the workout videos and athletic measurements and c) were smart early lottery picks? I'm skeptical about that being a good drafting strategy but I'm not saying the examples don't exist. I just couldn't come up with any off the top of my head.
AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/19/2015  11:24 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/19/2015  11:24 AM
I guess either my question was unclear or my suspicion was right that we should not give more weight to these videos than actual college/international in-game stats.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/19/2015  11:29 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/19/2015  11:30 AM
I think the times people have overvalued workouts over stats have been bad, particularly for European guys who folks haven't seen in game action as much.

I do remember that Emeka Okafor was the hands down consensus #1 pick based on his college play, but Dwight wowed them in workouts and wound up going #1 to Orlando, which you would have to say was the right pick.

Though I think workouts were why a guy like Chris Paul fell to 4, behind Marvin Williams (insane!) and Deron Williams (now looks insane, though people used to debate who was better)

I'm hoping Mudiay knocks the socks off the Sixers and Russell looks weak and slow in their workout. We'll see!

¿ △ ?
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27543
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
6/19/2015  11:31 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/19/2015  11:32 AM
Off the top of my head, Russell Westbrook. His stat line was not amazing. That said, he was considered a top defensive tweener based on athleticism. I can remember what the videos showed of him, but to half answer the question, mediocre stats are not determinative to the extent that elite athleticism exists IF player development continues in the NBA. If I am agreeing with you, for me, the videos of practice mean nothing to me. But combine stats mean something to me.

Russell Westbrook Stat Summary - UCLA Bruins:


										
Season GP MPG PPG FG% 3FG% FT% APG RPG BPG SPG
2007-08 39 33.8 12.7 46.5 33.8 71.3 4.3 3.9 0.2 1.6
2006-07 36 9 3.4 45.7 40.9 54.8 0.7 0.8 0 0.4


Career 75 21.9 8.3 46.3 35.3 68.5 2.5 2.4 0.1 1

This would support the Stein campaign, but for me, I am still leaning toward Hezonja.

You know I gonna spin wit it
BigRedDog
Posts: 22195
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #569
6/19/2015  11:36 AM
crzymdups wrote:I think the times people have overvalued workouts over stats have been bad, particularly for European guys who folks haven't seen in game action as much.

I do remember that Emeka Okafor was the hands down consensus #1 pick based on his college play, but Dwight wowed them in workouts and wound up going #1 to Orlando, which you would have to say was the right pick.

Though I think workouts were why a guy like Chris Paul fell to 4, behind Marvin Williams (insane!) and Deron Williams (now looks insane, though people used to debate who was better)

I'm hoping Mudiay knocks the socks off the Sixers and Russell looks weak and slow in their workout. We'll see!

Russell supposedly had an amazing workout for the sixers. Damn!

fishmike 9/27/2024 11:00 PM Ug I hate this. The idea of Towns is great until you see what a pussy he is. Jules is a dog. DD was a flamethrower locked up cheap for 3 more years. First Leon move I hate
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/19/2015  11:44 AM
EwingsGlass wrote:Off the top of my head, Russell Westbrook. His stat line was not amazing. That said, he was considered a top defensive tweener based on athleticism. I can remember what the videos showed of him, but to half answer the question, mediocre stats are not determinative to the extent that elite athleticism exists IF player development continues in the NBA. If I am agreeing with you, for me, the videos of practice mean nothing to me. But combine stats mean something to me.

Russell Westbrook Stat Summary - UCLA Bruins:


										
Season GP MPG PPG FG% 3FG% FT% APG RPG BPG SPG
2007-08 39 33.8 12.7 46.5 33.8 71.3 4.3 3.9 0.2 1.6
2006-07 36 9 3.4 45.7 40.9 54.8 0.7 0.8 0 0.4


Career 75 21.9 8.3 46.3 35.3 68.5 2.5 2.4 0.1 1

This would support the Stein campaign, but for me, I am still leaning toward Hezonja.


Thanks. I still suspect it's rare but that looks like a pretty good example actually.
I definitely agree with your statement that mediocre college stats are not automatically determinative of a poor NBA career. Some guys mature and work hard and grow beyond what could have been projected from their college stats. I just was (and still am) questioning that these workout videos are a good way to identify which guys will have that growth.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/19/2015  11:46 AM
We hate on Shump but he was better than Chris Singleton who many had ahead of him before the Workouts. He hasn't reached what many thought was his max potential but he is still very much the defensive guard he was drafted to be. He hasn't achieved the hoped for offensive progress.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/19/2015  11:49 AM
nixluva wrote:We hate on Shump but he was better than Chris Singleton who many had ahead of him before the Workouts. He hasn't reached what many thought was his max potential but he is still very much the defensive guard he was drafted to be. He hasn't achieved the hoped for offensive progress.

OK but Shump doesn't meet the A or C criteria in my question.
FistOfOakley
Posts: 21079
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/18/2010
Member: #3075

6/19/2015  11:49 AM
basically all of the ucla guards and SF under ben howland over performed their college stat line... you also have ariza, collison, jordan farmar...
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/19/2015  12:00 PM
FistOfOakley wrote:basically all of the ucla guards and SF under ben howland over performed their college stat line... you also have ariza, collison, jordan farmar...

Yeah, clearly overperforming the college stat line happens. That was only part of my question though. I'm looking for instances where a) the workout video is what indicated the guy would outperform their college stat line and b) it was a smart gamble with an early lottery pick. I include point b because gambling with a pick in the 20s or later is quite different from gambling with a pick this high.
FistOfOakley
Posts: 21079
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/18/2010
Member: #3075

6/19/2015  1:03 PM
workouts are not indicative of much... it's such a small slice of what a player actually is...

i can't really think of anyone.. pau gasol also blew away his workout his with the grizz but he put up a decent statline in europe... but then you also have darko... kg blew away his workout.. i think they said he touched the top of the backboard on consecutive jumps...

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39944
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

6/19/2015  1:58 PM
Mike Conley is the first guy I could think of.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/19/2015  2:01 PM
I think Conley had pretty good college stats, especially for a freshman. If you switch the rbs and assists, his production looks pretty similar to Winslow's.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/19/2015  2:03 PM
I remember Conley was thought of as a bit of a disappointment at first. Took him a few years to adapt his game and learn how to run an NBA team.
¿ △ ?
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39944
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

6/19/2015  2:23 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:I think Conley had pretty good college stats, especially for a freshman. If you switch the rbs and assists, his production looks pretty similar to Winslow's.

Yeah, but they were cancelled out by his shooting stats. A lot of people thought he was a reach when Memphis picked.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/19/2015  2:32 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/19/2015  2:32 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:I think Conley had pretty good college stats, especially for a freshman. If you switch the rbs and assists, his production looks pretty similar to Winslow's.

Yeah, but they were cancelled out by his shooting stats. A lot of people thought he was a reach when Memphis picked.


Shooting stats? I'd disagree. His 2 point shooting (58%) was phenomenal. Yeah, his 3 point shooting was low but you're talking about less than 70 total shots. His overall efficiency was excellent (because of the 2s). He had a true shooting % of .584 and effective field goal % of .552. Winslow is at .570 and .559 for those two stats.
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

6/19/2015  2:46 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:I think Conley had pretty good college stats, especially for a freshman. If you switch the rbs and assists, his production looks pretty similar to Winslow's.

Yeah, but they were cancelled out by his shooting stats. A lot of people thought he was a reach when Memphis picked.


Shooting stats? I'd disagree. His 2 point shooting (58%) was phenomenal. Yeah, his 3 point shooting was low but you're talking about less than 70 total shots. His overall efficiency was excellent (because of the 2s). He had a true shooting % of .584 and effective field goal % of .552. Winslow is at .570 and .559 for those two stats.

winslow looks a little slowish for a wing ... he makes me think of ron artest

so here is what phil is thinking ....
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

6/19/2015  3:05 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:I think Conley had pretty good college stats, especially for a freshman. If you switch the rbs and assists, his production looks pretty similar to Winslow's.

Yeah, but they were cancelled out by his shooting stats. A lot of people thought he was a reach when Memphis picked.


Shooting stats? I'd disagree. His 2 point shooting (58%) was phenomenal. Yeah, his 3 point shooting was low but you're talking about less than 70 total shots. His overall efficiency was excellent (because of the 2s). He had a true shooting % of .584 and effective field goal % of .552. Winslow is at .570 and .559 for those two stats.

Do your 2 point shooting stats consider whether they were jump shots or drives to the basket?

I would think you have look at where the shot is coming from. 3s are 3s, no matter how you slice it...not the same with a 2pt shot.

Winslow probably got to the basket a lot, and hit on his 3s at a good clip, but I have doubts about him continuing to shoot the 3 with as much success from the longer distance, and with more defensive pressure, and he is not just going to overpower NBA players, or drive by the smaller players he will face at SF. His inability to hit a shot off the dribble is documented, and I don't know much about his midrange game, but I can't think he took a ton of midrange jumpers this year, but I have no proof of this.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
FistOfOakley
Posts: 21079
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/18/2010
Member: #3075

6/19/2015  3:09 PM
2p fg% is a good barometer of their ability to get and make high percentage shots near the basket... if they're shooting a lot of midrange shots then they're going to shoot a lower percentage and also have more difficulty making other shots...

if they're good at driving .. they should have a high 2p fg% .500 is a good measure for guards .550 for big men in college...

FistOfOakley
Posts: 21079
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/18/2010
Member: #3075

6/19/2015  3:12 PM
WaltLongmire wrote:
Do your 2 point shooting stats consider whether they were jump shots or drives to the basket?

I would think you have look at where the shot is coming from. 3s are 3s, no matter how you slice it...not the same with a 2pt shot.

Winslow probably got to the basket a lot, and hit on his 3s at a good clip, but I have doubts about him continuing to shoot the 3 with as much success from the longer distance, and with more defensive pressure, and he is not just going to overpower NBA players, or drive by the smaller players he will face at SF. His inability to hit a shot off the dribble is documented, and I don't know much about his midrange game, but I can't think he took a ton of midrange jumpers this year, but I have no proof of this.

winslow didn't shoot a ton of midrange.. i think 80% of his shots were either 3s or in the restricted area... that's good... it means he's taking the most efficient shots on the floor...

russell took a lot of midrange shots but that's not necessarily good... if you're not confident in your finishing ability you will pull up a lot more often..

Examples of players where workout videos/measurements were more indicative than in game stats?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy