| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27731 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 4/29/2005 Member: #893 USA |
I agree. Good analogy, but not what I want from 4. I believe there is a spot on many teams for this type of role player. But he would truly need to take a huge step forward by adding that mid-range shot in order to validate the 4th pick overall. That said, in my head, he is more Deandre Jordan than Dan Gadzuric. I'm still dreaming od D. Russell dropping to us at the 4... or trading Melo to the Lakers for the 2 and some change.
Off topic -- Logic puzzle...if you have the 2 and the 4 pick with Towns off the board -- who do you take? Me, I take Russell and bet that Philly won't take Okafor to add to Nerlens Noel and Embiid. I assume if we took Okafor, then Russell is gone by the 4th pick. You know I gonna spin wit it
|
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
He had the same type athleticism that Stein had same strange college career that ran hot and cold no true post game raw in many aspects. Was thought of as a solid shot blocker but was only reasonable. This is why you want to see consistent domination at the college level. You are betting he will be consistent ion the next league up! And what will that bet leave you--Danb Gadzuric. not a stiff but not pick #4. And yes Gadzuric was every bt as athletic as stein.
RIP Crushalot😞
|
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
EwingsGlass wrote:I agree. Good analogy, but not what I want from 4. I believe there is a spot on many teams for this type of role player. But he would truly need to take a huge step forward by adding that mid-range shot in order to validate the 4th pick overall. That said, in my head, he is more Deandre Jordan than Dan Gadzuric. I'm still dreaming od D. Russell dropping to us at the 4... or trading Melo to the Lakers for the 2 and some change. I would take Okafor #1 RIP Crushalot😞
|
|
ramtour420
Posts: 26769 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 3/19/2007 Member: #1388 Russian Federation |
Damn, good find. What can I say, could he hedge on the PnR and recover to block the shot? What about his college performance ? Did he ever in his life anchor a defense like WCS can?
More importantly , did he improve his game? What did his free throws look like? Everything you have ever wanted is on the other side of fear- George Adair
|
|
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27731 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 4/29/2005 Member: #893 USA |
BRIGGS wrote:EwingsGlass wrote:I agree. Good analogy, but not what I want from 4. I believe there is a spot on many teams for this type of role player. But he would truly need to take a huge step forward by adding that mid-range shot in order to validate the 4th pick overall. That said, in my head, he is more Deandre Jordan than Dan Gadzuric. I'm still dreaming od D. Russell dropping to us at the 4... or trading Melo to the Lakers for the 2 and some change. Do you think Philly would draft a big? You know I gonna spin wit it
|
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
EwingsGlass wrote:BRIGGS wrote:EwingsGlass wrote:I agree. Good analogy, but not what I want from 4. I believe there is a spot on many teams for this type of role player. But he would truly need to take a huge step forward by adding that mid-range shot in order to validate the 4th pick overall. That said, in my head, he is more Deandre Jordan than Dan Gadzuric. I'm still dreaming od D. Russell dropping to us at the 4... or trading Melo to the Lakers for the 2 and some change. Oh if Philly had #2--they take the guard. I think RIP Crushalot😞
|
|
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27731 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 4/29/2005 Member: #893 USA |
BRIGGS wrote:EwingsGlass wrote:BRIGGS wrote:EwingsGlass wrote:I agree. Good analogy, but not what I want from 4. I believe there is a spot on many teams for this type of role player. But he would truly need to take a huge step forward by adding that mid-range shot in order to validate the 4th pick overall. That said, in my head, he is more Deandre Jordan than Dan Gadzuric. I'm still dreaming od D. Russell dropping to us at the 4... or trading Melo to the Lakers for the 2 and some change. I'm saying, if I have 2 and 4 and Philly has 3... I take Russell and gamble that Philly takes Mudiay over the remaining Big. Its all silly logic, but this is the kind of stuff I waste time thinking about. You know I gonna spin wit it
|
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
EwingsGlass wrote:BRIGGS wrote:EwingsGlass wrote:BRIGGS wrote:EwingsGlass wrote:I agree. Good analogy, but not what I want from 4. I believe there is a spot on many teams for this type of role player. But he would truly need to take a huge step forward by adding that mid-range shot in order to validate the 4th pick overall. That said, in my head, he is more Deandre Jordan than Dan Gadzuric. I'm still dreaming od D. Russell dropping to us at the 4... or trading Melo to the Lakers for the 2 and some change. Philly is the most unpredictable team in the NBA. What you might think could be 5 different answers RIP Crushalot😞
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
This is almost an embarrassing effort. Do we need so many negative threads about WCS? This could easily have gone in the "Willie Stein weakness" thread or the "The fear of the WCS Monroe scenario" thread you created to diss WCS already.
WCS is not Dan Gadzuric. He's similar just like your Jared Jeffries comparison. Only he's better than both of those guys. There's a reason most scouts compare him to Tyson Chandler. You can try to trash him all you want but that doesn't make what your saying true. WCS could go on to be a bust or JAG, but he's considered a worthy prospect in this draft. |
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
nixluva wrote:This is almost an embarrassing effort. Do we need so many negative threads about WCS? This could easily have gone in the "Willie Stein weakness" thread or the "The fear of the WCS Monroe scenario" thread you created to diss WCS already. Actually its not a bash or a weakness--its a pretty good comparison. Both under achievers in college who had their motors questioned. The both lacked focus had raw offensive games jump like jumping jacks. Had a few mesmerizing games but for some reason cant get there. Nixluva why did Willie Stein have 2 points and 5 breounds in a final four game in which he played 33 minutes? Can you go back and find me similar performance from a lead guy? How does a 7 foot 240 pound guy score 2 points on 1-4 in the biggest game in his life? Nope Dan Gadzuric is perfect it finally came to me--VERY similar guy. RIP Crushalot😞
|
|
callmened
Posts: 24448 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/26/2012 Member: #4234 |
i disagree. Dan Gadz was destroyed with injuries. plus he was a lumbering big man with two left feet. WCS is more of a fluid athlete. I actually think Danny Gadz couldve done better in the type of NBA. he was a mobile big man that was good on the PNR. WCS is a better athlete and more coordinated. Again, i like him...just not at#4
Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
BRIGGS wrote:nixluva wrote:This is almost an embarrassing effort. Do we need so many negative threads about WCS? This could easily have gone in the "Willie Stein weakness" thread or the "The fear of the WCS Monroe scenario" thread you created to diss WCS already. It's hard to take you seriously with this stuff. You're mostly resting on 1 bad game which can happen to anyone. None of that means he won't go on to have a good NBA career. This is a good article from the perspective of the T'Wolves taking WCS. Willie Cauley-Stein is a limited offensive player. He will not create offense for himself outside of grabbing offensive rebounds. He isn't much of a consistent post threat. He will not space the floor. He struggled unbelievably from the free throw line his freshman year (37.2%), was terrible his sophomore year (48.2), before finally becoming passable in his junior year (61.7). If Cauley-Stein ever averages more than 12-15 PPG, I would be floored. He's just not destined to be a guy who leads his team in scoring, and he probably won't be 2nd or 3rd either. He's also going to turn 22 before the start of the 2015-16 NBA season, which makes him older than other prospects. http://www.canishoopus.com/2015/4/22/8454569/an-argument-for-willie-cauley-stein |
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
nixluva wrote:BRIGGS wrote:nixluva wrote:This is almost an embarrassing effort. Do we need so many negative threads about WCS? This could easily have gone in the "Willie Stein weakness" thread or the "The fear of the WCS Monroe scenario" thread you created to diss WCS already.
RIP Crushalot😞
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
BRIGGS wrote:nixluva wrote:BRIGGS wrote:nixluva wrote:This is almost an embarrassing effort. Do we need so many negative threads about WCS? This could easily have gone in the "Willie Stein weakness" thread or the "The fear of the WCS Monroe scenario" thread you created to diss WCS already. And still he is top 10 on most mock drafts. I think you're selling this guy short in terms of his value at the NBA level. |
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
nixluva wrote:BRIGGS wrote:nixluva wrote:BRIGGS wrote:nixluva wrote:This is almost an embarrassing effort. Do we need so many negative threads about WCS? This could easily have gone in the "Willie Stein weakness" thread or the "The fear of the WCS Monroe scenario" thread you created to diss WCS already. 14-21 hes a good pick #4 is insane. Hes not skilled enough and too many other issues. If somoene is making apick of Willie Stein high their cognitive evaluation is simply off. RIP Crushalot😞
|
|
callmened
Posts: 24448 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/26/2012 Member: #4234 |
BRIGGS wrote:14-21 hes a good pick #4 is insane. Hes not skilled enough and too many other issues. If somoene is making apick of Willie Stein high their cognitive evaluation is simply off. yikes. i wouldnt go that far. Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
|
|
blkexec
Posts: 28444 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 9/3/2004 Member: #748 |
callmened wrote:BRIGGS wrote:14-21 hes a good pick #4 is insane. Hes not skilled enough and too many other issues. If somoene is making apick of Willie Stein high their cognitive evaluation is simply off. This guy really hates WCS. He's created 4 threads on him. He was the first to even suggest the Knicks were planning on taking him. LMAO. I never even thought about him at 4 until Briggs created a thread about the knicks will pick him. Wow....some of us change like the weather. But thats ok....Thats what happens when you are a fan of a team with 5 holes to fill. Phil will pick the best player available....Regardless of what we think. All we can do is go off of his tweets and articles. And from what I read, he prefers Towns over Ok4.....WCS over Kaminsky. Defense over Offense Two way over One way But seriously, if he is that bad, then why are you trying so hard to convince us otherwise, with 4 different threads.....probably a 5th on the way! Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland.
The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
|
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
blkexec wrote:callmened wrote:BRIGGS wrote:14-21 hes a good pick #4 is insane. Hes not skilled enough and too many other issues. If somoene is making apick of Willie Stein high their cognitive evaluation is simply off. Just because I thought the Knicks would take Stein a long time ago--does not mean I signed off on it. Hopefully they give careful thought to the present day NBA. Im not calling him bad--I dont think he is even close to pick #4. Also this thing that Kaminsky is bad defender--how many points did WCS have in that game? RIP Crushalot😞
|
|
callmened
Posts: 24448 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/26/2012 Member: #4234 |
i agree though, i wouldnt take WCS at #4 but he could be a good player
in regards to kaminsky, the whole team packed the paint vs kentucky and dared them to shoot. WCS has no offense expect for lob dunks. great game plan by bo ryan. i worry about kaminskys lack of defense...too upright in his stance. doesnt defend pick and roll well.but like WCS he will be a productive NBA player...just a different type Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
|