[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The Triangle
Author Thread
ramtour420
Posts: 26313
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 3/19/2007
Member: #1388
Russian Federation
3/16/2015  2:41 PM
Over the last, oh I dunno, few days/ weeks/months I have heard that the Triangle system is old, outdated and not fit for today's NBA. Those are some interesting points of view. However I would
Like to disagree. If we were talking thugball like the 90ies Knick or the Bad Boy Pistons then yes, the rules in today's NBA do not allow that type of play.

The triangle is based around ball and player movement. How can that ever be outdated? Hitting the open man? For the 3? Feeding cutters? Cutting to the basket with gusto? I just don't see how those fundamental plays can be overlooked when judging the Triangle. Don't let the tank season( THIS IS TANKTAAAAA,) blind you. Yes everyone looks bad , but this here is not what the triangle is all about. It's one of the most successfull systems that basketball has ever seen. Am I missing something here?

Everything you have ever wanted is on the other side of fear- George Adair
AUTOADVERT
blkexec
Posts: 28347
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
3/16/2015  2:52 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/16/2015  2:53 PM
ramtour420 wrote:Over the last, oh I dunno, few days/ weeks/months I have heard that the Triangle system is old, outdated and not fit for today's NBA. Those are some interesting points of view. However I would
Like to disagree. If we were talking thugball like the 90ies Knick or the Bad Boy Pistons then yes, the rules in today's NBA do not allow that type of play.

The triangle is based around ball and player movement. How can that ever be outdated? Hitting the open man? For the 3? Feeding cutters? Cutting to the basket with gusto? I just don't see how those fundamental plays can be overlooked when judging the Triangle. Don't let the tank season( THIS IS TANKTAAAAA,) blind you. Yes everyone looks bad , but this here is not what the triangle is all about. It's one of the most successfull systems that basketball has ever seen. Am I missing something here?

It's a generational thing. These young guys don't know about true basketball anymore. The art of basketball is slowly fading into 1 on 1 melo ball. Everything is either pick and roll, or 1 on 1....You can see it even in pickup games. It's your turn, now its your turn, then it's your turn. I stopped playing with these young guys because it's terrible. I could be the best shooter on the team, and would only get 2 shots. The triangle was developed from the old school way of playing ball. These new guys are only successful in a run and gun system.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

3/16/2015  2:54 PM
ramtour420 wrote:Over the last, oh I dunno, few days/ weeks/months I have heard that the Triangle system is old, outdated and not fit for today's NBA. Those are some interesting points of view. However I would
Like to disagree. If we were talking thugball like the 90ies Knick or the Bad Boy Pistons then yes, the rules in today's NBA do not allow that type of play.

The triangle is based around ball and player movement. How can that ever be outdated? Hitting the open man? For the 3? Feeding cutters? Cutting to the basket with gusto? I just don't see how those fundamental plays can be overlooked when judging the Triangle. Don't let the tank season( THIS IS TANKTAAAAA,) blind you. Yes everyone looks bad , but this here is not what the triangle is all about. It's one of the most successfull systems that basketball has ever seen. Am I missing something here?

yYes ... nobody has any interest in running or teaching it for a reason and the top teams and the ones using advanced metrics are using much more of a spread ooffense with the high PnR.

Too many damn long range jumpers which I detest.

Now I will leave this thread to Nixluva for his feasting and puppet shows.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/16/2015  2:56 PM
No your not really missing anything. People are judging the Triangle off how it looks with no talent and the wrong talent. These Knicks players are getting open but they lack the talent to finish the plays off. If people have been watching the games you'd see tons of missed layups and open shots all game. Now if you put better players in these same spots they'd be making those shots at a higher %.

Also people think you can't run in the Triangle and that is also not true. The very 1st thing that is taught in the Triangle is to run and look for early offense but if it's not there they set up and run the offense.

By Phil Jackson and Tex Winter
Seven Principles of the Sound Offense

An effective offense, to my way of thinking, features the following dimensions.
1. Penetration. Players must penetrate the defense, and the best way to do this is the fast break, because basketball is a full-court game, from baseline to baseline.

2. Spacing. I am a fanatic about how players distribute themselves on the offensive end of the court. They must space themselves in a way that makes it most difficult to defend, trap, and help. Players must align a certain number of feet apart. In high school, I’d recommend 12 to 15 feet spacing, in college, 15 to18 feet, and in the NBA, 15 to 20 feet. Proper spacing not only exposes individual defensive players’ vulnerabilities, but also ensures that every time the defense tries to trap, an offensive player will be open.

3. Ball and player movements. Players must move, and must move the ball, with a purpose. Effective off-the-ball activity is much more important than most fans and players think because they’re so used to watching only the movement of the ball and the player in possession of it. But there is only one ball and there are five players, meaning most players will have the ball in their hands 20 percent or less of the time the team is in possession of the ball.

4. Options for the ball handler. The more options a smart player has to attack a defender, the more successful that offensive player will be. When teammates are all moving to positions to free themselves (or another teammate with a pick), the ball handler’s choices are vastly increased.

5. Offensive rebounding and defensive balance. On all shots we take, players must go strong for the rebound while retaining court balance and awareness to prevent the opponent’s fast break.

6. Versatile positioning. The offense must offer to any player the chance to fill any spot on the court, independent of the player’s role. All positions should be interchangeable.

7. Use individual talents. It only makes sense for an offense to allow a team to take advantage of the skill sets of its best players. This doesn’t preclude the focus on team play that is emphasized in the six other principles, but it does acknowledge that some individuals have certain types and degrees of talent, and an offense should accentuate those assets. Michael Jordan taught me this.

Finally, I want the offense to flow from rebound to fast break, to quick offense, to a system of offense. The defenses in the NBA are so good because the players are so big, quick, and well coached. Add the pressure that the 24-second clock rule applies to the offense to find a good shot, and the defense gets even better.

The triangle offense has proven most effective, even against such obstacles, when players commit to and execute the system. The offense hinges on players attending to minute details in executing not just plays but also the fundamentals underlying the plays. Once players have mastered the individual techniques required of their roles, we then integrate those individuals into a team. Once this is done, the foundation for a good offense is solidly in place. The team can then go on the court with the confidence and poise so essential to success.

This method of play is as old as basketball. The triangle set is adjustable to the personnel, but such adaptations can be made without altering the essence of the offense. The only necessary adjustment from one season to the next involves tailoring the series of options based on each individual’s talents.

Shved has been pushing the ball better since coming here and if we can imagine having better players who can run with him and finish it would really improve the offense quite a bit. The players are getting better at executing the motion and passing but finishing off the plays is a problem. That should improve with better players as we look towards next season.

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

3/16/2015  2:58 PM
blkexec wrote:
ramtour420 wrote:Over the last, oh I dunno, few days/ weeks/months I have heard that the Triangle system is old, outdated and not fit for today's NBA. Those are some interesting points of view. However I would
Like to disagree. If we were talking thugball like the 90ies Knick or the Bad Boy Pistons then yes, the rules in today's NBA do not allow that type of play.

The triangle is based around ball and player movement. How can that ever be outdated? Hitting the open man? For the 3? Feeding cutters? Cutting to the basket with gusto? I just don't see how those fundamental plays can be overlooked when judging the Triangle. Don't let the tank season( THIS IS TANKTAAAAA,) blind you. Yes everyone looks bad , but this here is not what the triangle is all about. It's one of the most successfull systems that basketball has ever seen. Am I missing something here?

It's a generational thing. These young guys don't know about true basketball anymore. The art of basketball is slowly fading into 1 on 1 melo ball. Everything is either pick and roll, or 1 on 1....You can see it even in pickup games. It's your turn, now its your turn, then it's your turn. I stopped playing with these young guys because it's terrible. I could be the best shooter on the team, and would only get 2 shots. The triangle was developed from the old school way of playing ball. These new guys are only successful in a run and gun system.

the new generation is using more brains and analytics which the older generation could not even spell.

I too hate teams and players that don't move the ball. Does SA and Atlanta not move the ball?

We should play the smartest basketball that we are capable of playing and teaching and we should use data and shot charts as well as anything and anybody we can get our hands on the can give us any edge.

Are you happy with our shot selection? How about Melo's shot selection?

so here is what phil is thinking ....
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
3/16/2015  3:02 PM
ramtour420 wrote:Over the last, oh I dunno, few days/ weeks/months I have heard that the Triangle system is old, outdated and not fit for today's NBA. Those are some interesting points of view. However I would
Like to disagree. If we were talking thugball like the 90ies Knick or the Bad Boy Pistons then yes, the rules in today's NBA do not allow that type of play.

The triangle is based around ball and player movement. How can that ever be outdated? Hitting the open man? For the 3? Feeding cutters? Cutting to the basket with gusto? I just don't see how those fundamental plays can be overlooked when judging the Triangle. Don't let the tank season( THIS IS TANKTAAAAA,) blind you. Yes everyone looks bad , but this here is not what the triangle is all about. It's one of the most successfull systems that basketball has ever seen. Am I missing something here?

The media are running with it because the media are running with it. Back in Phil's Bulls championship days and Phil's Laker championship days, how many other teams ran the triangle? Did that mean it was obsolete then? It's ridiculous- the whole triangle thing is over blown, it's just a system- in basketball you just need to chose a system, get the personal to run it and you'll have success. When we were run and gun all we heard was that style wouldn't win in the playoffs. Now we're not run and gun and apparently only run and gun will win in the playoffs. The reality is simple- play defense and have everyone on the same page. Pass the ball. Make shots. It's not rocket science.

smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
3/16/2015  3:07 PM
mreinman wrote:
blkexec wrote:
ramtour420 wrote:Over the last, oh I dunno, few days/ weeks/months I have heard that the Triangle system is old, outdated and not fit for today's NBA. Those are some interesting points of view. However I would
Like to disagree. If we were talking thugball like the 90ies Knick or the Bad Boy Pistons then yes, the rules in today's NBA do not allow that type of play.

The triangle is based around ball and player movement. How can that ever be outdated? Hitting the open man? For the 3? Feeding cutters? Cutting to the basket with gusto? I just don't see how those fundamental plays can be overlooked when judging the Triangle. Don't let the tank season( THIS IS TANKTAAAAA,) blind you. Yes everyone looks bad , but this here is not what the triangle is all about. It's one of the most successfull systems that basketball has ever seen. Am I missing something here?

It's a generational thing. These young guys don't know about true basketball anymore. The art of basketball is slowly fading into 1 on 1 melo ball. Everything is either pick and roll, or 1 on 1....You can see it even in pickup games. It's your turn, now its your turn, then it's your turn. I stopped playing with these young guys because it's terrible. I could be the best shooter on the team, and would only get 2 shots. The triangle was developed from the old school way of playing ball. These new guys are only successful in a run and gun system.

the new generation is using more brains and analytics which the older generation could not even spell.

I too hate teams and players that don't move the ball. Does SA and Atlanta not move the ball?

We should play the smartest basketball that we are capable of playing and teaching and we should use data and shot charts as well as anything and anybody we can get our hands on the can give us any edge.

Are you happy with our shot selection? How about Melo's shot selection?

For me this is the lamest aspect of analytics- the intellectual snobbery. Unfortunately, following analytics does not make you smarter than people who don't. It just means you follow analytics. Those of us who don't believe they are the be all and end all, or just don't find them very interesting or entertaining aren't idiots, we just disagree on how much of basketball (or indeed life) you can quantify, and we watch basketball for entertainment- watching fiery competition, passion, the unpredictable- it's exciting. You like efficiency- I'm not sure how this makes you more intelligent.

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

3/16/2015  3:08 PM
would be nice if the triangle had even one success story with a team that did not have 4-5 of the top players of all time.

example: take a team like Atlanta, no stars ... would the triangle be as good as the offense that they are running? I say no way but who cares ... no way to prove that since nobody cares to try the triangle.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
3/16/2015  3:10 PM
Has anyone talked about how much pick and roll Shved and Bargnani are running lately? they're running a lot of them.

Phil seems to be letting Fish tweak the Triangle and find something that works better.

¿ △ ?
blkexec
Posts: 28347
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
3/16/2015  3:15 PM
mreinman wrote:would be nice if the triangle had even one success story with a team that did not have 4-5 of the top players of all time.

example: take a team like Atlanta, no stars ... would the triangle be as good as the offense that they are running? I say no way but who cares ... no way to prove that since nobody cares to try the triangle.

I read somewhere that other teams use a variation of the triangle.....mixed in with other systems. To me, thats a better approach because you can align the combination of systems to fit the players.....That way, we don't turn down talent becasue they don't fit the system. Rather develop a multi system combination that fits the players.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
3/16/2015  3:15 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/16/2015  3:16 PM
mreinman wrote:would be nice if the triangle had even one success story with a team that did not have 4-5 of the top players of all time.

example: take a team like Atlanta, no stars ... would the triangle be as good as the offense that they are running? I say no way but who cares ... no way to prove that since nobody cares to try the triangle.

How many teams have won a championships using any system without any hall of famers?

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

3/16/2015  3:16 PM
smackeddog wrote:
mreinman wrote:
blkexec wrote:
ramtour420 wrote:Over the last, oh I dunno, few days/ weeks/months I have heard that the Triangle system is old, outdated and not fit for today's NBA. Those are some interesting points of view. However I would
Like to disagree. If we were talking thugball like the 90ies Knick or the Bad Boy Pistons then yes, the rules in today's NBA do not allow that type of play.

The triangle is based around ball and player movement. How can that ever be outdated? Hitting the open man? For the 3? Feeding cutters? Cutting to the basket with gusto? I just don't see how those fundamental plays can be overlooked when judging the Triangle. Don't let the tank season( THIS IS TANKTAAAAA,) blind you. Yes everyone looks bad , but this here is not what the triangle is all about. It's one of the most successfull systems that basketball has ever seen. Am I missing something here?

It's a generational thing. These young guys don't know about true basketball anymore. The art of basketball is slowly fading into 1 on 1 melo ball. Everything is either pick and roll, or 1 on 1....You can see it even in pickup games. It's your turn, now its your turn, then it's your turn. I stopped playing with these young guys because it's terrible. I could be the best shooter on the team, and would only get 2 shots. The triangle was developed from the old school way of playing ball. These new guys are only successful in a run and gun system.

the new generation is using more brains and analytics which the older generation could not even spell.

I too hate teams and players that don't move the ball. Does SA and Atlanta not move the ball?

We should play the smartest basketball that we are capable of playing and teaching and we should use data and shot charts as well as anything and anybody we can get our hands on the can give us any edge.

Are you happy with our shot selection? How about Melo's shot selection?

For me this is the lamest aspect of analytics- the intellectual snobbery. Unfortunately, following analytics does not make you smarter than people who don't. It just means you follow analytics. Those of us who don't believe they are the be all and end all, or just don't find them very interesting or entertaining aren't idiots, we just disagree on how much of basketball (or indeed life) you can quantify, and we watch basketball for entertainment- watching fiery competition, passion, the unpredictable- it's exciting. You like efficiency- I'm not sure how this makes you more intelligent.

I did not say that I am more intelligent and that it is the end all / be all.

I just see that there is a generational gap in its acceptance just like there was / is with PC's and smart phones.

I do think its silly when people dismiss things that they know very little about.

I think that quantum physics is kinda dumb ... those idiots who came up with that should get punched! Its so damn stupid. And they also think they are so damn smart cause they know about this quantum physics thingy and we don't.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

3/16/2015  3:17 PM
blkexec wrote:
mreinman wrote:would be nice if the triangle had even one success story with a team that did not have 4-5 of the top players of all time.

example: take a team like Atlanta, no stars ... would the triangle be as good as the offense that they are running? I say no way but who cares ... no way to prove that since nobody cares to try the triangle.

I read somewhere that other teams use a variation of the triangle.....mixed in with other systems. To me, thats a better approach because you can align the combination of systems to fit the players.....That way, we don't turn down talent becasue they don't fit the system. Rather develop a multi system combination that fits the players.

I think that SA does.

I think that a good system is a mix of all the most efficient and best practices and systems.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
3/16/2015  3:17 PM
blkexec wrote:
mreinman wrote:would be nice if the triangle had even one success story with a team that did not have 4-5 of the top players of all time.

example: take a team like Atlanta, no stars ... would the triangle be as good as the offense that they are running? I say no way but who cares ... no way to prove that since nobody cares to try the triangle.

I read somewhere that other teams use a variation of the triangle.....mixed in with other systems. To me, thats a better approach because you can align the combination of systems to fit the players.....That way, we don't turn down talent becasue they don't fit the system. Rather develop a multi system combination that fits the players.

Next season we'll introduce some variations from the triangle- we stuck with it so rigidly this season just to establish it.

Knicks1969
Posts: 25394
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/7/2014
Member: #5915

3/16/2015  3:18 PM
There is nothing wrong with the triangle; however, not everyone can coach it to perfection, nor not every player can fit in that system. Today, too many young dudes like to rely on their scoring abilities, as a result, most have become one trick ponies.
Thank God Fisher is no longer our coach, now let's get Calderon out of here:)
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

3/16/2015  3:18 PM
smackeddog wrote:
mreinman wrote:would be nice if the triangle had even one success story with a team that did not have 4-5 of the top players of all time.

example: take a team like Atlanta, no stars ... would the triangle be as good as the offense that they are running? I say no way but who cares ... no way to prove that since nobody cares to try the triangle.

How many teams have won a championships using any system without any hall of famers?

Detroit?

what's the point? If Atlanta will win? That is not the point.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
y2zipper
Posts: 20946
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/30/2010
Member: #3287

3/16/2015  3:18 PM
Great talent is the anchor behind every great basketball team whether they're running the triangle, SSOL or any other pick-and-roll spread type of offense. This is Charles Barkely's point when he says he "doesn't believe in analytics" even if that opinion is overblown and not exactly true. People can blame the "triangle" all they want, but New York doesn't have any talent outside of Melo.

This generation's best talent is Kobe, Duncan and LeBron. Together, they've appeared in 14 out of the last 15 finals and if you go Shaq, who's a generational talent in his own right, you'd get 15 out of 15. If you extend that back to every championship, you'd find that at least every team has a B+ player or two. Even Atlanta does.

franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
3/16/2015  3:19 PM
there was a pair of threads earlier about the triangle and our offense- as I read the articles referenced, we're last in offense not because of talent, but because of the kinds of shots (long range 2's) we're taking. This to me is the triangle.

Does better talent improve our teams ability to run and exploit the triangle as a system? I do like some of the team play I see out there.

Against Phoenix & GS, we stayed with them for a short while. Put Melo (hopefully healthy*), top 4 pick and 1-2 impact type FA, and maybe we stay in those games longer, win a one.

But I am concerned that the system is flawed for today's NBA.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/16/2015  3:23 PM
crzymdups wrote:Has anyone talked about how much pick and roll Shved and Bargnani are running lately? they're running a lot of them.

Phil seems to be letting Fish tweak the Triangle and find something that works better.

The PnR/PnP is a HUGE part of the Triangle if you have good offensive players who can run it. The Triangle part of the offense is just one half of the court on the other side you have a 2 man game and that has the option of PnP, Give and Go etc. It's called the Pinch Post in Triangle parlance but it's just basic basketball. It's up to the players to decide to run it or not. It's always there.

The Triangle is a great offense if you have quality bigs cuz they're always involved and can keep the defense moving as they are posting up close to the basket. All those shots Cole is missing won't be missed by a high quality post big who scores at a higher %. This is what Phil is going to look to do this summer.

Knicks1969
Posts: 25394
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/7/2014
Member: #5915

3/16/2015  3:24 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/16/2015  3:26 PM
Knicks look so bad early on running the triangle because of: fisher, Amare, JR, Dalembert, Calderon, and Shumpert.

Also because of Carmelo, because he is not the type of vocal leader who can demand that others follow his lead.

Thank God Fisher is no longer our coach, now let's get Calderon out of here:)
The Triangle

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy