blkexec wrote:Knixkik wrote:Seems to happen more and more. What is the difference between today and the 90s? Why do guys get hurt more today?you would think training would be better today and we would see less injuries, not so many more.
The internet, social media, etc....is part of the reason why you didn't hear about these same injuries.
Players are getting bigger and faster....There's a lot more performance enhancement stuff out there.
Players are putting too much trust in new technology or wine baths and forget about the old school basics.
Players are making more money so they are under more stress than before.
After tearing my achilles, I read a study that said stress is also part of the reasons why ligaments tear. And as money increases, so does your stress levels.
Also, because so much money is on the line....Players are over training as well....Which was already stated.
Great points!!!
Add to it the fact we have more players and more players with extreme talent who get hurt in college or highschool are now instead of being done and never making it to the NBA, are able to continue and THEN get hurt or be fragile. Kind of natural selection. Back in the day a high % of babies died in their first year. Those that survived were naturally more fit for survival and fight infection as well. Now we have sicker people becuase they lived long enough to be unhealthy adults. Just an example.
Guys playing into thier 30's at high levels where before they were barely able to play. Look at Willis and Clyde. They broke down young. Pete Maravich today could have contined his career with surgery as many players. Cazzie Russell never reached his potential. Ralph Sampson was never built to play center, he was a stretch 4 or a three like Durant. Kid had handle and a great shot. Instead they played him at the C against big's and he got bad knees trying to push his way. I think if Durant came up in that time they would have done the same thing and I doubt he would have even made it to the NBA because he was so skinny.
Bill Russell retired at 32, yet WIlt player to about 37 and Jabbar to 42 if I recall. These guys, Like Jordan were just genetic wonders!!!
We are also employing and value the athlete than the fundamentally sound players. If a guy does not have the vertical or the wingspan he might not be carried on a team to be developed. Guys like Bill Bradley and Debussure were not fast or athletically gifted by todays standards but the grit a good outside shot (fundamentals) carried them to HOF careers.
Are there any statistics that prove any of this? I think we tend to romance the past that "guys never missed games, they played with one arm and no toes if they had to!!!"
I think there are a lot of reasons and it all adds up.
Question is it really different now or then 20 years ago or do we just know everything because of media access?