grillco wrote:I like Melo and don't see him as part of the problem with the Knicks. I'd also like him to go the Duncan route and take less to help the team, but to be clear and fair we must remember that Duncan did it to maintain he team. He wanted to make sure Parker and Manu were happy while providing a little more flexibility for Pop to bring in the best role players to fit their system. Melo doesn't have anything close to that. Anything he takes with the Knicks is a larger theoretical gamble than any other team as NYK has to take the biggest steps to get to championship contention.I'm not a fan of Phil though, but I'm hoping he can turn things around at MSG and bring at least one ring. So I'm trying to buy in. Will you, the collective or singular, buy in if Phil deems paying Melo max as part of fulfilling that plan?
OR are you (again collective or singular) gonna bitch and moan for the next five years with annoying whining after every lose and "I told you so's" if at the end of the latest iteration there is no chip?
As a glutton for punishment, I'm going to go along for the ride, despite my deep disdain for Dolan...just as I have for the past 15 years of futility.
Duncan took less at 35, not at 30.
Duncan's salary by age:
31 $19mm
32 $20.5mm
33 $22mm
34 $18mm
35 $21mm
36 $9mm
37 $10mm
So when Duncan was a year older than Melo he made $100mm + over the years he was 31-35.
Grillco... you nailed it. This is all about "feelings" all the way around.
Phil wants it to "feel" like Melo signed under Phil's terms, not Melos.
The fans wants to "feel" like Melo took less to be here making him their guy, or sacrificing to be in NY, or whatever
Melo wants everyone to know that all these other teams want him, and when he goes back to the Knicks its because he "feels" like it.
Feelings... nothing more than feelings....
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs