[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

We Got 99 Problems, And We Still Need A Point Guard
Author Thread
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
4/30/2014  10:01 AM
This is a golden era for young and gifted NBA guards. A first glance, Westbrook, Paul, Beale, Teague, Wall, Curry, and even Kemba Walker jump into focus. If Knicks supporters have any thoughts of being competitive, all we need to do is watch how the ball is matriculating up court during the playoffs.

How could it be that the New York Knicks, in the cradle of point guards, could be so deficient?

The audition line forms to the left. We have some serious catching up to do.

once a knick always a knick
AUTOADVERT
helloharv
Posts: 20457
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/22/2012
Member: #4139

4/30/2014  10:05 AM
while I tend to agree with you ---- Westbrook is shockingly on the verge of losing in the 1st round , so it is not ALL the point guard
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
4/30/2014  10:08 AM
helloharv - one difference. Westbrook is in the playoffs.

The Knicks are in the lottery.

It don't mean a thing, if you ain't got that ball reversal.

once a knick always a knick
GustavBahler
Posts: 42864
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

4/30/2014  10:12 AM
NYC doesnt crank out PGs like it used to. Jackson won all those titles with at least a superstar SG. It will be interesting to see what Jackson does now that he doesnt have one. We need a PG who plays D and knows how to keep everyone on the same page.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
4/30/2014  10:19 AM
Gustav - excellent point. The next Patrick Beverly or Damian Lillard could come from anywhere.

If the scouting department that report to Clarence Gaines and Phil Jackson has any prime directive, it is to locate one dude, playing anywhere in the world, who can manage the rock... and dominate in the last two minutes of a game.

once a knick always a knick
helloharv
Posts: 20457
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/22/2012
Member: #4139

4/30/2014  10:42 AM
I once had a dream the knicks had an amazing PG that was a world wide sensation
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39941
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

4/30/2014  10:48 AM
misterearl wrote:Gustav - excellent point. The next Patrick Beverly or Damian Lillard could come from anywhere.

If the scouting department that report to Clarence Gaines and Phil Jackson has any prime directive, it is to locate one dude, playing anywhere in the world, who can manage the rock... and dominate in the last two minutes of a game.

I'd be happy just signing someone like Darren Collision to a short term deal and trying to address the issue through the draft. That's assuming we keep Melo. If we go triangle, then defense and outside shooting are going to be the most important attributes for our next PG to have.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

4/30/2014  10:55 AM
I would love to wait for Dragic in 2015

Shot 50 pct and 40 pct from 3. The last guy to do that I think was Nash (who was the only player to have multiple (3x) 50,40, 90 (FT%) seasons (Bird did it once)

We should not take on any contracts next year that affect our future cap space. Its ok to lose next year for the greater good.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
4/30/2014  10:59 AM
BigDaddyG - defining the criteria for the next Knicks guard is essential. Your point is well taken.

Why our beloved team does not have a talented yute at guard is baffling.

once a knick always a knick
fitzfarm
Posts: 25165
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/28/2010
Member: #3285

4/30/2014  12:31 PM
How about trying to get Perrier Jackson... I don't think it would take much of a trade ... And the guy is super talented, could even be a star in the nba.
fishmike
Posts: 53864
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
4/30/2014  1:43 PM
misterearl wrote:BigDaddyG - defining the criteria for the next Knicks guard is essential. Your point is well taken.

Why our beloved team does not have a talented yute at guard is baffling.

PGs and centers... trash you can find but the good ones dont grow on trees. The two most overpaid positions in sports.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Dagger
Posts: 22065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/12/2012
Member: #4184

4/30/2014  1:57 PM
helloharv wrote:I once had a dream the knicks had an amazing PG that was a world wide sensation

And then you woke up and realized they did but let him walk

Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

4/30/2014  2:35 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/30/2014  2:37 PM
fitzfarm wrote:How about trying to get Perrier Jackson... I don't think it would take much of a trade ... And the guy is super talented, could even be a star in the nba.

Cosign. Not sure if he'll be a star but he'll definitely be a factor in the NBA and is definitely better than anything we have at the position currently. He and New Orleans are at odds -- I don't think he'll ever play there. They're gonna have to move him eventually.

As far as a FA signing with our limited MLE goes, I continue to like Darren Collison or Patty Mills. Think I like Collison a hair better (I got DC as a slightly better defender whereas Mills might be a slightly better offensive player) but it's negligible -- both are nice players that are capable of taking the next step (running their own squad full-time). And they may come at a bargain rate--that's the key. Either guy starting around $3.2mm a year is properly value. I know there's been talk that neither is that prototypical "triangle PG" but what does that really mean? I feel both of these guys fit right into a triangle PERFECTLY -- they can each shoot, they can each move the ball, they're both efficient offensive players and the added bonus: each guy is lightning quick and can function out of the triangle setup if need be (both guys can push the ball when it presents itself and both guys can put their head down and break their man off the dribble when nothing else is there). Given our current situation, I don't see how we could do much better. As soon as the FA period begins, I'd come hard with my best offer for either of these guys: the full tax-payers MLE offer + a starting role. To me that'd be money well spent.

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
4/30/2014  2:45 PM
fishmike wrote:
misterearl wrote:BigDaddyG - defining the criteria for the next Knicks guard is essential. Your point is well taken.

Why our beloved team does not have a talented yute at guard is baffling.

PGs and centers... trash you can find but the good ones dont grow on trees. The two most overpaid positions in sports.

Centers who cant shoot a mid range and are not super athletic are worthless

ES
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

4/30/2014  3:03 PM
Finestrg wrote:
fitzfarm wrote:How about trying to get Perrier Jackson... I don't think it would take much of a trade ... And the guy is super talented, could even be a star in the nba.

Cosign. Not sure if he'll be a star but he'll definitely be a factor in the NBA and is definitely better than anything we have at the position currently. He and New Orleans are at odds -- I don't think he'll ever play there. They're gonna have to move him eventually.

As far as a FA signing with our limited MLE goes, I continue to like Darren Collison or Patty Mills. Think I like Collison a hair better (I got DC as a slightly better defender whereas Mills might be a slightly better offensive player) but it's negligible -- both are nice players that are capable of taking the next step (running their own squad full-time). And they may come at a bargain rate--that's the key. Either guy starting around $3.2mm a year is properly value. I know there's been talk that neither is that prototypical "triangle PG" but what does that really mean? I feel both of these guys fit right into a triangle PERFECTLY -- they can each shoot, they can each move the ball, they're both efficient offensive players and the added bonus: each guy is lightning quick and can function out of the triangle setup if need be (both guys can push the ball when it presents itself and both guys can put their head down and break their man off the dribble when nothing else is there). Given our current situation, I don't see how we could do much better. As soon as the FA period begins, I'd come hard with my best offer for either of these guys: the full tax-payers MLE offer + a starting role. To me that'd be money well spent.

I like both of those guys but I think that I trust Collison more based on experience. He played some really solid defense yesterday on curry.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

4/30/2014  3:28 PM
mreinman wrote:
Finestrg wrote:
fitzfarm wrote:How about trying to get Perrier Jackson... I don't think it would take much of a trade ... And the guy is super talented, could even be a star in the nba.

Cosign. Not sure if he'll be a star but he'll definitely be a factor in the NBA and is definitely better than anything we have at the position currently. He and New Orleans are at odds -- I don't think he'll ever play there. They're gonna have to move him eventually.

As far as a FA signing with our limited MLE goes, I continue to like Darren Collison or Patty Mills. Think I like Collison a hair better (I got DC as a slightly better defender whereas Mills might be a slightly better offensive player) but it's negligible -- both are nice players that are capable of taking the next step (running their own squad full-time). And they may come at a bargain rate--that's the key. Either guy starting around $3.2mm a year is properly value. I know there's been talk that neither is that prototypical "triangle PG" but what does that really mean? I feel both of these guys fit right into a triangle PERFECTLY -- they can each shoot, they can each move the ball, they're both efficient offensive players and the added bonus: each guy is lightning quick and can function out of the triangle setup if need be (both guys can push the ball when it presents itself and both guys can put their head down and break their man off the dribble when nothing else is there). Given our current situation, I don't see how we could do much better. As soon as the FA period begins, I'd come hard with my best offer for either of these guys: the full tax-payers MLE offer + a starting role. To me that'd be money well spent.

I like both of those guys but I think that I trust Collison more based on experience. He played some really solid defense yesterday on curry.

I tend to agree. I like Collison a touch higher for the reasons you stated but I'd be OK with either guy. Either one of these guys on a 3-4 year deal starting in the $3-3.5mm range is good value. Potential to be VERY GOOD if either guy could take it to another level given more playing time and responsibility (distinct possibility).. To me these possibilities make each guy attractive for that kind of money.

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

4/30/2014  3:34 PM
Finestrg wrote:
mreinman wrote:
Finestrg wrote:
fitzfarm wrote:How about trying to get Perrier Jackson... I don't think it would take much of a trade ... And the guy is super talented, could even be a star in the nba.

Cosign. Not sure if he'll be a star but he'll definitely be a factor in the NBA and is definitely better than anything we have at the position currently. He and New Orleans are at odds -- I don't think he'll ever play there. They're gonna have to move him eventually.

As far as a FA signing with our limited MLE goes, I continue to like Darren Collison or Patty Mills. Think I like Collison a hair better (I got DC as a slightly better defender whereas Mills might be a slightly better offensive player) but it's negligible -- both are nice players that are capable of taking the next step (running their own squad full-time). And they may come at a bargain rate--that's the key. Either guy starting around $3.2mm a year is properly value. I know there's been talk that neither is that prototypical "triangle PG" but what does that really mean? I feel both of these guys fit right into a triangle PERFECTLY -- they can each shoot, they can each move the ball, they're both efficient offensive players and the added bonus: each guy is lightning quick and can function out of the triangle setup if need be (both guys can push the ball when it presents itself and both guys can put their head down and break their man off the dribble when nothing else is there). Given our current situation, I don't see how we could do much better. As soon as the FA period begins, I'd come hard with my best offer for either of these guys: the full tax-payers MLE offer + a starting role. To me that'd be money well spent.

I like both of those guys but I think that I trust Collison more based on experience. He played some really solid defense yesterday on curry.

I tend to agree. I like Collison a touch higher for the reasons you stated but I'd be OK with either guy. Either one of these guys on a 3-4 year deal starting in the $3-3.5mm range is good value. Potential to be VERY GOOD if either guy could take it to another level given more playing time and responsibility (distinct possibility).. To me these possibilities make each guy attractive for that kind of money.

I hope you are right but I see Collison wanting more money. PG's are in high demand and this is the off season to cash out.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
4/30/2014  4:44 PM
Dagger wrote:
helloharv wrote:I once had a dream the knicks had an amazing PG that was a world wide sensation

And then you woke up and realized they did but let him walk

Lin is much maligned in Houston at this point. He has an albatross contract, the fan base has soured on him and he isn't good enough and doesn't fit well enough with the Rockets. He had a great run in ny but he has been up and down in Houston and they need a lot more. Taking Lin in a trade is like taking Boozer. He is the cap hit that the other team is moving. The Rockets would love to move him and most likely will have to include something to make it worth while for the other team to take back his deal.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
4/30/2014  4:46 PM
fitzfarm wrote:How about trying to get Perrier Jackson... I don't think it would take much of a trade ... And the guy is super talented, could even be a star in the nba.
One guy I think the knicks should bring in is Darius Morris. The kid is only 23, is a big point guard and a former first round pick. He just would need to work on his shot to run the point in the triangle.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
fitzfarm
Posts: 25165
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/28/2010
Member: #3285

4/30/2014  4:56 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
fitzfarm wrote:How about trying to get Perrier Jackson... I don't think it would take much of a trade ... And the guy is super talented, could even be a star in the nba.
One guy I think the knicks should bring in is Darius Morris. The kid is only 23, is a big point guard and a former first round pick. He just would need to work on his shot to run the point in the triangle.

I agree I like Morris as well. I'd be happy with p jack or Morris... More so then collision he'll cost more and isn't really that much better then what we already got

We Got 99 Problems, And We Still Need A Point Guard

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy