Author | Thread |
dk7th
Posts: 30006 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/14/2012 Member: #4228 USA |
![]() more good material to measure players actual value to their respective teams--
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/10740818/introducing-real-plus-minus there was another article from a while back about gallinari that also looked at this statistic but is called RAPM there http://www.denverstiffs.com/2013/1/12/3866818/inside-the-numbers-danilo-gallinari-denver-nuggets knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
|
AUTOADVERT |
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
![]() dk7th wrote:more good material to measure players actual value to their respective teams-- Thanks dk. Will take a look and read the analysis. The first things that jumps out at me was that Iggy was rated ahead of Durant. That is a big red flag but I will read more ... so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
![]() Go to the below page and sort by Win Shares and you would probably get the closest advanced stat to reality (there will always be anomalies with every stat)
http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_2014_advanced.html Top 20: Rk Player WS ▾ so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
jrodmc
Posts: 32927 Alba Posts: 50 Joined: 11/24/2004 Member: #805 USA |
![]() mreinman wrote:Go to the below page and sort by Win Shares and you would probably get the closest advanced stat to reality (there will always be anomalies with every stat) But...Melo sux, and he's not really hurt! |
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
![]() jrodmc wrote:mreinman wrote:Go to the below page and sort by Win Shares and you would probably get the closest advanced stat to reality (there will always be anomalies with every stat) I think 13th is relatively fair of what and where he was and should be this year. DJ has had a great year and a candidate for MIP but I think he may be a bit too high. Dragic and Noah may also deserves to be bumped higher. so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
jrodmc
Posts: 32927 Alba Posts: 50 Joined: 11/24/2004 Member: #805 USA |
![]() mreinman wrote:jrodmc wrote:mreinman wrote:Go to the below page and sort by Win Shares and you would probably get the closest advanced stat to reality (there will always be anomalies with every stat) I'm sorry, but any list that has Melo within sight of the likes of St. Paul the George is completely unrealistic! Seriously though, I think win shares has been pooh-poohed on enough in this forum. You might have missed those threads, and I don't have enough ambition to go searching for them. |
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
![]() jrodmc wrote:mreinman wrote:jrodmc wrote:mreinman wrote:Go to the below page and sort by Win Shares and you would probably get the closest advanced stat to reality (there will always be anomalies with every stat) Paul George his high because of his Defensive Win Shares. He is a very good two way player. Wins Shares is just one of the advanced metrics and they can all be argued but it seems to always end up with the most realistic rankings. Melo fans don't like it because it does not have him as high as they would like and anti Melo fans believe that it/he is still too high. I do think it is the most advanced though still far from perfect. so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
tkf
Posts: 36487 Alba Posts: 6 Joined: 8/13/2001 Member: #87 |
![]() dk7th wrote:more good material to measure players actual value to their respective teams-- good read, I always thought the +/- stat was flawed because a player could be on the floor with wade and lebron for a majority of the time, he will have a pretty good +/-.. this breaks it down more, looking at the true contribution of the player while on the floor.. Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser...............
TKF
|
tkf
Posts: 36487 Alba Posts: 6 Joined: 8/13/2001 Member: #87 |
![]() jrodmc wrote:mreinman wrote:Go to the below page and sort by Win Shares and you would probably get the closest advanced stat to reality (there will always be anomalies with every stat) did you examine him? smh (green font) Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser...............
TKF
|
jrodmc
Posts: 32927 Alba Posts: 50 Joined: 11/24/2004 Member: #805 USA |
![]() tkf wrote:jrodmc wrote:mreinman wrote:Go to the below page and sort by Win Shares and you would probably get the closest advanced stat to reality (there will always be anomalies with every stat) I don't have to! I believe all obtuse comments about Melo's sucktitude! LMAO [sick smilie] |
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 2/2/2004 Member: #581 USA |
![]() mreinman wrote:Go to the below page and sort by Win Shares and you would probably get the closest advanced stat to reality (there will always be anomalies with every stat) What makes it the closest to reality? At the very least, you can make a good argument for using WS48 because you have to adjust for minutes played but I think there are other useful stats too. |
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
![]() Bonn1997 wrote:mreinman wrote:Go to the below page and sort by Win Shares and you would probably get the closest advanced stat to reality (there will always be anomalies with every stat) I did not say that there aren't other useful stats. Everything has its flaws. As you know WP's has an argument against Berri for over weighted rebounding. etc ... WS48 is good too but what if a player is able to log more minutes? Actual WS's contributed seem to be more closely related to wins. And if you look at the list, they seem to get it right - but that does not mean its correct. Certainly a more realistic wins gauge than RPMS? so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 2/2/2004 Member: #581 USA |
![]() mreinman wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:mreinman wrote:Go to the below page and sort by Win Shares and you would probably get the closest advanced stat to reality (there will always be anomalies with every stat) I disagree. I've never seen any evidence that there's a consistent, big drop off in production as minutes increase. At most, you could look at WS48 and maybe do a tiny adjustment in your mind. Total WS is too confounded with minutes played though. |
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
![]() Bonn1997 wrote:mreinman wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:mreinman wrote:Go to the below page and sort by Win Shares and you would probably get the closest advanced stat to reality (there will always be anomalies with every stat) Minutes played is the actual minutes played. If a player plays 40 per and contributes more than a player who plays 35 minutes then he contributed more. If want to make an argument that the player who played 35 minutes with the player who played 5 minutes as his backup then perhaps I can see some truth to that but there were need to be a stat that compiles this combined production. Backups very often dont perform at the level of the starter. How about RPMS? What stat(s) do you go by as your barometer? You are a big fan of David Berri but now have a problem with WP's. Now I know stats are forever evolving but at any given time, you have to choose something. It can't keep changing based on the required outcome (not saying that you do this, but many do). so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 2/2/2004 Member: #581 USA |
![]() mreinman wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:mreinman wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:mreinman wrote:Go to the below page and sort by Win Shares and you would probably get the closest advanced stat to reality (there will always be anomalies with every stat) I give some weight to most of the advanced stats including the nba tracking data. I definitely give win shares a good amount of weight. So who would you give a higher contract to? A guy who plays great in 20 mpg or an ordinary player with a higher win share total because he's playing 32 mpg? |