Im not sure curry would have survived the media crush and the doubts about his health.
Maybe the kid winces in pain and Dolan things he is making faces at him and has him banished!
Sure one spot on the draft can make a big difference but we all know not dice roll will go your way.
My point is GS seems to be built one part draft, one part free agency, and one part via trades!!!!!!
Risks were taken. Granted we took one with Dice and Amare but either keep rolling the dice or take more bets and increase the odds!
My philosphy in business is to make many small decisons and when well researched and thought out you increase your odds. Thats why I say "luck is when preperation and opportunity collide"!!!! With the knicks I don't prescribe that you go all in on one area as many things are not in the teams control. The teams that balance things create more opportunities when presented. When you telegraph your intentions as we all know we did to get lebron, we got fleeced because the dummy owner was dictating his intenetions and Walsh had little leverage.
I thought the rockets did a nice job using draft assets and cap space to prepare for the opportunity to gain Harden and Dwight via trade.
While new CBA prevents dynasties it can prolong some as well. OKC by its trade enables it to recieve assets in return for unaffordable players. its their choice how then handle it. Like the NFL they can go all in and pay big tax for a run in a chip, or keep building toward one.
Its better for the league in the long run. Teams in small markets seem to be on the rise while Lakers, Knicks, Boston are in decline. Lakers and boston at least get some bang for their buck.
Granger falls off the cap and they can resign Stephanson. If his value on the open market is too high, well then another team that made cap can grab him. Creates parity.
We all know big market does not mean success. Lakers used it well but post Jordan Era Bulls have been mixed and the knicks we know have more money then sense!!!