GustavBahler wrote:What was encouraging, even more than the shots falling, was the ball movement. Their methodical approach to swinging the ball around and setting up the kill. No reason why they can't do that against the most athletic team in the league.

It won't be as easy to get an open look, it requires some patience. This season we would get punched in the mouth by the other squad and any ball movement would come to a screaching halt. Can't give up on the game plan when the shot stops falling or the defense tightens up, that's the key to playing younger and more athletic teams IMO. Using veteran smarts.

i did like the chemistry that melo/amear had on a few occasions. i also liked the fact that the knicks finally went to the boston/pierce style of ball-movement where they spread it around and melo got the ball closer towards the end of the shot-clock. it's only one game, so who knows if we'll keep any of this up, but it was nice to see for once.

nyk4ever wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:What was encouraging, even more than the shots falling, was the ball movement. Their methodical approach to swinging the ball around and setting up the kill. No reason why they can't do that against the most athletic team in the league.

It won't be as easy to get an open look, it requires some patience. This season we would get punched in the mouth by the other squad and any ball movement would come to a screaching halt. Can't give up on the game plan when the shot stops falling or the defense tightens up, that's the key to playing younger and more athletic teams IMO. Using veteran smarts.

i did like the chemistry that melo/amear had on a few occasions. i also liked the fact that the knicks finally went to the boston/pierce style of ball-movement where they spread it around and melo got the ball closer towards the end of the shot-clock. it's only one game, so who knows if we'll keep any of this up, but it was nice to see for once.

Yeah, I like the idea of Melo getting the ball for a last shot after other alternatives have been exhausted. That's not say that's the only time Melo should get it, like when he has the lane, but I don't want to give him too much time with the ball either. That's my only real problem with Melo going one on one is that he waits too long at times to make his move when he should be driving before defenders digs in.

GustavBahler wrote:

EnySpree wrote:I turned the Game off after the stand off between Shump and Blatche.

I just was turned off by it. Why do we have to be mad enough to fight in order for these guys to play basketball? Shump squared up to Blatche and Blatche stepped to him. Blatche should have shoved him to the ground. Calm down ***** and respect the game.

I didnt want to see the knicks taking advantage of this **** team. Beating them was not impressive and to be that wound up is corny. We shouldn't stoop to Garnrtt level. Respect the game and play together.

The schedule is really easy for the next 9 games or so.... let's see what these guys do. Knicks still need a point guard and a big. Nothing has changed.

One things for sure, Bargnani should be the starting 4 when Tyson comes back.

I will take a team with some fight in them over a team that lays down and feels sorry for themselves any GD day of the week.

Then you are out of touch with what I'm saying. You don't need to get to the point where you aren't playing the game. When you get on the court you fight to win not stoop to Garnett levels. Respect the game. We don't need to be engaging in stuff that's outside of the game. You fight with your teammates to win the game. There is a huge difference.

Check our oak, Mason, Ewing days.... all of our bullying was basketball plays. It can be rough. If guys don't like it then man up. You don't square guys up and run your mouth. There were times when oak, ewing and Mason barked on Starks center court because he was to busy fighting with his man than paying the game.

You must respect the game at all times. Im big on that. We can play physical but there is a line and I want or team to play within these boundaries.

IronWillGiroud wrote:I'm all for respecting the game but there are times where you gotta have a little craThatzy,

lost like 9 in a row, against city rivals, you gotta throw in a little tabasco

Yeah we need crazy to win but you don't see guys like kmart squaring up after a insignificant exchange. But you will see him throw guys to the ground while still legitimately going for the ball. That's the difference.

Its the main reason I don't like garnett or dwight. Howard likes to throw elbows while the ref isn't looking and other extra things that have nothing to do with basketball.

EnySpree wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

EnySpree wrote:I turned the Game off after the stand off between Shump and Blatche.

I just was turned off by it. Why do we have to be mad enough to fight in order for these guys to play basketball? Shump squared up to Blatche and Blatche stepped to him. Blatche should have shoved him to the ground. Calm down ***** and respect the game.

I didnt want to see the knicks taking advantage of this **** team. Beating them was not impressive and to be that wound up is corny. We shouldn't stoop to Garnrtt level. Respect the game and play together.

The schedule is really easy for the next 9 games or so.... let's see what these guys do. Knicks still need a point guard and a big. Nothing has changed.

One things for sure, Bargnani should be the starting 4 when Tyson comes back.

I will take a team with some fight in them over a team that lays down and feels sorry for themselves any GD day of the week.

Then you are out of touch with what I'm saying. You don't need to get to the point where you aren't playing the game. When you get on the court you fight to win not stoop to Garnett levels. Respect the game. We don't need to be engaging in stuff that's outside of the game. You fight with your teammates to win the game. There is a huge difference.

Check our oak, Mason, Ewing days.... all of our bullying was basketball plays. It can be rough. If guys don't like it then man up. You don't square guys up and run your mouth. There were times when oak, ewing and Mason barked on Starks center court because he was to busy fighting with his man than paying the game.

You must respect the game at all times. Im big on that. We can play physical but there is a line and I want or team to play within these boundaries.

I was kinda understanding your point, though not agreeing, until you stated that. Basketball plays? That's a joke right? Oakley was one of the dirtiest players I've ever seen. Only diff between he and KG is that he would actually do something and did more than once.

but

We can never let anyone punk us and use anything, everything we can to motivate ourselves at all times, THE REASOn why some of the best players in the 80s-90s were also the biggest trash talkers

I have no problem with what Iman and AB did, even with the Nets
Back then, it would be a personal foul at best, now it can be a flagrant 2/technical

EnySpree, AB should be the PF when Chandler comes back?

I totally disagree about having Chandler inserted in to the starting lineup when he comes back
Both AB and Melo together have been largely ineffective playing SF/PF vs PF/C *only either one has a good game at best*

You cannot always justify height to translate to better play
We lose speed/spacing and for the most part our REBOUNDER and DEF doesn't even improve(gets arguably worse with Melo at SF and AB at PF)
In my opinion, both Melo and AB are far worst at defending the SF for Melo and PF for AB, than PF for Melo and C for AB

While AB has been blocking shots and playing good DEF at C with 1v1 and HELP DEF
And Melo can use his strength to right for position and rebounds and not go out to defend 3pt shooters or allow them to pass right through him if he tries

Yes, I agree we cannot constantly play them out of position the entire game

vs some pretty good C's in the league

Duncan
Hibbert
D12
Horford
Gortat
Drummond
Brook/KG

If anything AB should be our starting C at least till Chandler gets back in NBA shape after sitting for 6 weeks plus

Young guards kill us.