gunsnewing wrote:It has been but why do you still hear people especially in the media talk about how Melo is the greatest pure scorer the game has seen and blame everyone but Melo for the Knicks struggles? Woodson, Shumpert, Tyson, Kidd, Felton, Lin, Fields, Dantoni, Walsh, Grunwald etc
SAME OLe, same ole guns.. you are correct, that talk about best pure scorer is garbage... either you are a scorer or not.. LOL.. I never understood that term "pure scorer", I even googled it and no one seems to have a clear definition. the one I found pretty much sums up a "pure Scorer" as someone who does nothing else but score... just think about it, when you say "pure scorer" it is the absence of all that is not scoring.... so really is that a good thing?
here is an explination of what one would consider a "pure" Point guard.
Similarly, the concept of a "pure scorer" is a little mystifying. What is purity? An absence of contaminants. In human terms, a contaminant would be something immoral or, less harshly, lacking in the department of moral norms. Basically, to be pure is to successfully live up to the ideal, whatever it may be. In measuring purity in basketball, the ideal point guard would be one who sets up teammates and doesn't take too many shots himself. So measuring it is pretty straightforward: assists are pure, shots are impure.
http://www.sbnation.com/2013/10/14/4833574/klay-thompson-pure-scorer-golden-state-warriors
what is confusing is that no one considers lebron the best pure scorer, yet since he has been in the league, and he came in the same year carmelo came in, has scored 3200 more points than carmelo..
kevin Durant won 3 straight scoring titles, and if you want to keep it real pretty much tied carmelo for scoring title last year.....
so how can people keep calling him, best pure scorer? I don't get it..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser...............
TKF