[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Tyson Back to Dallas?
Author Thread
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/17/2013  8:07 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/17/2013  8:11 AM
It just occurred to me that the Mavs would probably be interested in making a play at Chandler if they fail to get Howard, in order to interest CP3 in joining the team. If a scenario like that begins to work itself out, however unlikely that would be, could the Knicks get a package of Darren Collision, the no.13th and 46th picks; maybe Shawn Marion too?
AUTOADVERT
Nalod
Posts: 71312
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/17/2013  8:10 AM
Who plays center for us?

Does Dirk with Tyson really that appealing to CP3 to make that move and leave L.A.?

Collison might not be a true upgrade on Felton and what are we going to do three draft picks? Develop them?

NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/17/2013  8:15 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/17/2013  8:18 AM
Nalod wrote:Who plays center for us?

Does Dirk with Tyson really that appealing to CP3 to make that move and leave L.A.?

Collison might not be a true upgrade on Felton and what are we going to do three draft picks? Develop them?

I definitely don't think a Chandler-Dirk pairing is more attractive than LAC or what they could potentially get if they made a few moves. Then again, teams have had great delusions for this offseason and offseasons past. Dallas is already one of those teams thinking they can get both Howard and CP3 by dangling a 35 year old former all-star and a shell of a roster. Who knows, maybe they do the deal I proposed and do other smaller deals like last offseaso n to make a few more runs with Dirk. The more likely scenario IMO is that they move Dirk and take a swing at the 2014 draft.

As for what we do at C, we'd have to resort to playing the position by committee like most teams do anyway. I'm not too sure if that would be a downgrade considering how poorly Tyson Chandler has played in our playoff series.

jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
6/17/2013  9:03 AM
NardDogNation wrote:It just occurred to me that the Mavs would probably be interested in making a play at Chandler if they fail to get Howard, in order to interest CP3 in joining the team. If a scenario like that begins to work itself out, however unlikely that would be, could the Knicks get a package of Darren Collision, the no.13th and 46th picks; maybe Shawn Marion too?

That would mean CP3 should be interested in coming here because Tyson's already here!
Melo and Shawn Marion and Stat? What is that? A big 1 and 17/54ths?

Plus, I thought all the latest buzz was around CP3 sexting DHow, not our FluBoy?

NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

6/17/2013  3:51 PM
jrodmc wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:It just occurred to me that the Mavs would probably be interested in making a play at Chandler if they fail to get Howard, in order to interest CP3 in joining the team. If a scenario like that begins to work itself out, however unlikely that would be, could the Knicks get a package of Darren Collision, the no.13th and 46th picks; maybe Shawn Marion too?

That would mean CP3 should be interested in coming here because Tyson's already here!
Melo and Shawn Marion and Stat? What is that? A big 1 and 17/54ths?

Plus, I thought all the latest buzz was around CP3 sexting DHow, not our FluBoy?

No doubt, the recent buzz has been about a CP3-Howard pairing in a new destination but there are a number of factors working against their favor. I think its highly probable that Dallas misses both guys but I do think Chandler might be a decent consolation prize. That move would leave us without a starting center but we could replace him through a free agent signing (Samuel Dalembert, Jermaine O'Neal, Chris Kaman,etc.), trade (Ekpe Udoh, etc.), or with existing players in committee (Kenyon Martin, Marcus Camby and Amar'e Stoudemire).

Knixkik
Posts: 35475
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
6/17/2013  4:00 PM
NardDogNation wrote:It just occurred to me that the Mavs would probably be interested in making a play at Chandler if they fail to get Howard, in order to interest CP3 in joining the team. If a scenario like that begins to work itself out, however unlikely that would be, could the Knicks get a package of Darren Collision, the no.13th and 46th picks; maybe Shawn Marion too?

This is a decent move, but only if you identify a player you really like at 13.

Nalod
Posts: 71312
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/17/2013  4:09 PM
CP3 Toasted to play with Melo.

CP3 getting Celts group and likley stays.

Clips can offer Bledsoe and Griffin to Lakes for Dwight. Dwight gets max deal if sign and trade.

IM not sure how it all shakes out but Danny is making some bold house cleaning of Celts and Clipps going all in.

Celts can then get Josh Smith.

I don't see Dwight in Dallas if its just Dirk. If Dwight makes his way to Rockets without Sign and trade houstan can make some interesting trades with Asik to round out roster.

Read up that GSW are better spaced without Dlee if paired with Bogut. Maybe Dlee ends up in Houstan if they can't make a big splash.

Tyson I doubt goes anywhere.

loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

6/17/2013  4:12 PM
Knixkik wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:It just occurred to me that the Mavs would probably be interested in making a play at Chandler if they fail to get Howard, in order to interest CP3 in joining the team. If a scenario like that begins to work itself out, however unlikely that would be, could the Knicks get a package of Darren Collision, the no.13th and 46th picks; maybe Shawn Marion too?

This is a decent move, but only if you identify a player you really like at 13.

Is Collison that good? I haven't seen much but he seems to ebb and flow a bit, if that's the reason for the trade I wouldn't do it. If it's to get high quality pick at 13 tgat may make sense. But I thought this was a weak draft? Could we get Olynyk at 13??

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
Knixkik
Posts: 35475
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
6/17/2013  4:23 PM
loweyecue wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:It just occurred to me that the Mavs would probably be interested in making a play at Chandler if they fail to get Howard, in order to interest CP3 in joining the team. If a scenario like that begins to work itself out, however unlikely that would be, could the Knicks get a package of Darren Collision, the no.13th and 46th picks; maybe Shawn Marion too?

This is a decent move, but only if you identify a player you really like at 13.

Is Collison that good? I haven't seen much but he seems to ebb and flow a bit, if that's the reason for the trade I wouldn't do it. If it's to get high quality pick at 13 tgat may make sense. But I thought this was a weak draft? Could we get Olynyk at 13??

Its a weak draft at the top, but good quality later on. Yes Olynyk would be a player who could be available that you would target in this scenario.

Knixkik
Posts: 35475
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
6/17/2013  4:29 PM
Heres an interesting scenario. Would you trade Chandler for David Lee? GS seems to be going towards a lineup with only one big man, and using Barnes and D Green as forwards. Chandler would start for them and Bogut comes off the bench, as they can't trust him to play big minutes or for an entire season. We start Martin, Lee, Anthony, Shumpert, and Felton with Stoudemire coming off the bench. Don't kill me but it makes some sense for both teams. Provides us the offensive firepower we need.
martin
Posts: 76389
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
6/17/2013  4:35 PM
Knixkik wrote:Heres an interesting scenario. Would you trade Chandler for David Lee? GS seems to be going towards a lineup with only one big man, and using Barnes and D Green as forwards. Chandler would start for them and Bogut comes off the bench, as they can't trust him to play big minutes or for an entire season. We start Martin, Lee, Anthony, Shumpert, and Felton with Stoudemire coming off the bench. Don't kill me but it makes some sense for both teams. Provides us the offensive firepower we need.

It's doesn't make sense to me as Knicks have no C or backup C. And no interior defense outside of 20 minutes per game of KMart, if he can last the whole season, which is doubtful as a starter.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Knixkik
Posts: 35475
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
6/17/2013  4:37 PM
martin wrote:
Knixkik wrote:Heres an interesting scenario. Would you trade Chandler for David Lee? GS seems to be going towards a lineup with only one big man, and using Barnes and D Green as forwards. Chandler would start for them and Bogut comes off the bench, as they can't trust him to play big minutes or for an entire season. We start Martin, Lee, Anthony, Shumpert, and Felton with Stoudemire coming off the bench. Don't kill me but it makes some sense for both teams. Provides us the offensive firepower we need.

It's doesn't make sense to me as Knicks have no C or backup C. And no interior defense outside of 20 minutes per game of KMart, if he can last the whole season, which is doubtful as a starter.

This only works assuming you resign Martin, add another F/C like, say, Elton Brand, get some quality minutes out of Camby, and possibly draft a big man too. But if you don't do these things it doesn't make sense i agree.

Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
6/17/2013  9:57 PM
I've got a novel idea. Let's keep Chandler. He obviously was still hurting during the playoffs. He's been a solid player for us and he does play defense where we desparately need it.
The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
IronWillGiroud
Posts: 25207
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/17/2012
Member: #4359

6/17/2013  9:58 PM
Markji wrote:I've got a novel idea. Let's keep Chandler. He obviously was still hurting during the playoffs. He's been a solid player for us and he does play defense where we desparately need it.

gtfo,

he wasn't "obviously hurting"

he was just a scared little girl,

DO NOT FORGET WHAT YOU SAW WITH YOUR EYES, DO NOT FORGET, BRETHREN!!!

HOW SOON YOU FORGET MARKJI, AND YOU START MAKING EXCUSES!!

TYSON IS A DISGRACE TO THE UNIFORM

The Will, check out the Official Home of Will's GameDay Art: http://tinyurl.com/thewillgameday
IronWillGiroud
Posts: 25207
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/17/2012
Member: #4359

6/17/2013  9:59 PM
IronWillGiroud wrote:
Markji wrote:I've got a novel idea. Let's keep Chandler. He obviously was still hurting during the playoffs. He's been a solid player for us and he does play defense where we desparately need it.

gtfo,

he wasn't "obviously hurting"

he was just a scared little girl,

DO NOT FORGET WHAT YOU SAW WITH YOUR EYES, DO NOT FORGET, BRETHREN!!!

HOW SOON YOU FORGET MARKJI, AND YOU START MAKING EXCUSES!!

TYSON IS A DISGRACE TO THE UNIFORM

to be a big man like this, and to play like a woman like he did against the pacers,

THIS IS NOT ONLY DISGRACE TO UNIFORM, BUT TO HUMANITY!!!

OBAMA SHOULD PUT HIM IN PRISON FOR LIFE FOR DISGRACING OUR GREAT NATION

The Will, check out the Official Home of Will's GameDay Art: http://tinyurl.com/thewillgameday
tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119

6/18/2013  7:09 AM
I'd love to move Tyson but is this the trade we really want?
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
6/18/2013  7:19 AM
IronWillGiroud wrote:
IronWillGiroud wrote:
Markji wrote:I've got a novel idea. Let's keep Chandler. He obviously was still hurting during the playoffs. He's been a solid player for us and he does play defense where we desparately need it.

gtfo,

he wasn't "obviously hurting"

he was just a scared little girl,

DO NOT FORGET WHAT YOU SAW WITH YOUR EYES, DO NOT FORGET, BRETHREN!!!

HOW SOON YOU FORGET MARKJI, AND YOU START MAKING EXCUSES!!

TYSON IS A DISGRACE TO THE UNIFORM

to be a big man like this, and to play like a woman like he did against the pacers,

THIS IS NOT ONLY DISGRACE TO UNIFORM, BUT TO HUMANITY!!!

OBAMA SHOULD PUT HIM IN PRISON FOR LIFE FOR DISGRACING OUR GREAT NATION


Ha - Ha! Pretty funny. A life sentence. I think we don't agree on Chandler.
The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
6/18/2013  8:39 AM
There aren't even any Centers playing in the finals. I don't think a center is a priority as much as just having a low post big who can score, rebound and block shots, maybe you get a offensive starter, and a defensive back up.

I don't think keeping TYSON really matters, which is why I feel he's is on the trading block on the low...Just like Amare was last off season

ES
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
6/18/2013  9:59 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/18/2013  10:00 AM
knicks1248 wrote:There aren't even any Centers playing in the finals. I don't think a center is a priority as much as just having a low post big who can score, rebound and block shots, maybe you get a offensive starter, and a defensive back up.

I don't think keeping TYSON really matters, which is why I feel he's is on the trading block on the low...Just like Amare was last off season

That is part of the problems Chandler gets paid way to much. I feel Jerome Jordan and Barron can give much more than Chandler, fraction of what Chandler costs.

jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
6/18/2013  11:19 AM
martin wrote:
Knixkik wrote:Heres an interesting scenario. Would you trade Chandler for David Lee? GS seems to be going towards a lineup with only one big man, and using Barnes and D Green as forwards. Chandler would start for them and Bogut comes off the bench, as they can't trust him to play big minutes or for an entire season. We start Martin, Lee, Anthony, Shumpert, and Felton with Stoudemire coming off the bench. Don't kill me but it makes some sense for both teams. Provides us the offensive firepower we need.

It's doesn't make sense to me as Knicks have no C or backup C. And no interior defense outside of 20 minutes per game of KMart, if he can last the whole season, which is doubtful as a starter.


+1
Yes. Let's think about this for a second. Kmart breaks down, Amare ends up in traction by the end of camp, and we get to watch yet another season of DLee matador defense. While Cambyman mixes gatorade on the sidelines. Imagine Dlee defending Hibbert. Just for a second.

We've been here before. Live long and prosper, Knix, but please let the Mr. meaningless double double dream die.

Tyson Back to Dallas?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy