[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Tyson for Deng?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
NYKBocker
Posts: 38419
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
5/29/2013  11:04 AM
Hibbert is the new thing. Well...having a big center is not really new but in today's NBA it is a new thing and teams do their usual dance of copycat.

Chicago is going to be looking for somebody to match up with Hibbert and they have some identical parts they can send out.

Would you trade Tyson for Deng straight up? Tyson with Thibs would be gold.

Deng with Melo in the frontline? Deng's contract is also 1 year shorter than Tyson.
AUTOADVERT
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
5/29/2013  11:06 AM
Trade makes no sense. They have Noah who is younger. Plus they need Deng for his scoring.
NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
NYKBocker
Posts: 38419
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
5/29/2013  11:09 AM
AnubisADL wrote:Trade makes no sense. They have Noah who is younger. Plus they need Deng for his scoring.

Is Noah a center? I don't think he can check Hibbert. They are also very high on Butler.
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
5/29/2013  11:24 AM
Dang thats a bad idea.
the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
Nalod
Posts: 71306
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
5/29/2013  11:26 AM
Tie up about one third of salary on two players very similar to each other but the one you alreay have is better?

Noah is better than Tyson.
callmened
Posts: 24448
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/26/2012
Member: #4234
5/29/2013  12:18 PM
Plus this will never happen
Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/29/2013  1:20 PM
Deng is mediocre. I'd rather wait and see if Tyson gets back to normal.
gr33d
Posts: 20788
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/19/2006
Member: #1097
USA
5/29/2013  1:28 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:Deng is mediocre. I'd rather wait and see if Tyson gets back to normal.

Agreed.

Not to mention Tyson's trade value is at an all time low, considering how he was abused in the Indiana series... Praying that once he's had time to heal up, Tyson can regain his old form. Centers are so rare, it's gotta be worth the risk of waiting at this point.

"If you ain't first, you're last" - Ricky Bobby
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
5/29/2013  1:38 PM
NYKBocker wrote:Hibbert is the new thing. Well...having a big center is not really new but in today's NBA it is a new thing and teams do their usual dance of copycat.

Chicago is going to be looking for somebody to match up with Hibbert and they have some identical parts they can send out.

Would you trade Tyson for Deng straight up? Tyson with Thibs would be gold.

Deng with Melo in the frontline? Deng's contract is also 1 year shorter than Tyson.


I know this is a bit off target, but you make a great point with the center being the new thing.. not many teams have a big like hibbert, who can just flat out change games.. I was looking at the sixers and Bynum, if he returns to form, it won't take long for that sixer team to be a factor... so while I agree with trading chandler, we better get some big able bodies in return.

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Nalod
Posts: 71306
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
5/29/2013  1:43 PM
.........and who is our center?

Melo>Deng
toad
Posts: 20210
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/14/2012
Member: #4338
5/29/2013  1:46 PM
NYKBocker wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:Trade makes no sense. They have Noah who is younger. Plus they need Deng for his scoring.

Is Noah a center? I don't think he can check Hibbert. They are also very high on Butler.

If Tyson could check Hibbert, we'd be in the ECF right now, and you wouldn't want to trade him.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38419
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
5/29/2013  1:58 PM
toad wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:Trade makes no sense. They have Noah who is younger. Plus they need Deng for his scoring.

Is Noah a center? I don't think he can check Hibbert. They are also very high on Butler.

If Tyson could check Hibbert, we'd be in the ECF right now, and you wouldn't want to trade him.

Tyson wasn't the only problem.
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
5/29/2013  2:03 PM
tkf wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:Hibbert is the new thing. Well...having a big center is not really new but in today's NBA it is a new thing and teams do their usual dance of copycat.

Chicago is going to be looking for somebody to match up with Hibbert and they have some identical parts they can send out.

Would you trade Tyson for Deng straight up? Tyson with Thibs would be gold.

Deng with Melo in the frontline? Deng's contract is also 1 year shorter than Tyson.


I know this is a bit off target, but you make a great point with the center being the new thing.. not many teams have a big like hibbert, who can just flat out change games.. I was looking at the sixers and Bynum, if he returns to form, it won't take long for that sixer team to be a factor... so while I agree with trading chandler, we better get some big able bodies in return.

absolutely. Even a limited Big lit Chandler is better than no true big. To bad there are so few "game changing" centers out there.

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
toad
Posts: 20210
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/14/2012
Member: #4338
5/29/2013  2:10 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/29/2013  2:10 PM
NYKBocker wrote:
toad wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:Trade makes no sense. They have Noah who is younger. Plus they need Deng for his scoring.

Is Noah a center? I don't think he can check Hibbert. They are also very high on Butler.

If Tyson could check Hibbert, we'd be in the ECF right now, and you wouldn't want to trade him.

Tyson wasn't the only problem.

Your premise is that Tyson has some value to the Bulls because he can do something Noah cannot do--check Hibbert. My point is if that were true, he would have the same value to the Knicks. Unfortunately, your premise is fatally flawed.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38419
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
5/29/2013  2:23 PM
toad wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:
toad wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:Trade makes no sense. They have Noah who is younger. Plus they need Deng for his scoring.

Is Noah a center? I don't think he can check Hibbert. They are also very high on Butler.

If Tyson could check Hibbert, we'd be in the ECF right now, and you wouldn't want to trade him.

Tyson wasn't the only problem.

Your premise is that Tyson has some value to the Bulls because he can do something Noah cannot do--check Hibbert. My point is if that were true, he would have the same value to the Knicks. Unfortunately, your premise is fatally flawed.

I actually think Tyson can check Hibbert. Tyson had no problem defending Dwight or Bynum. The reason I want Deng is because I think he can contribute more than Tyson for the Knicks.
Nalod
Posts: 71306
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
5/29/2013  2:56 PM
DurzoBlint wrote:
tkf wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:Hibbert is the new thing. Well...having a big center is not really new but in today's NBA it is a new thing and teams do their usual dance of copycat.

Chicago is going to be looking for somebody to match up with Hibbert and they have some identical parts they can send out.

Would you trade Tyson for Deng straight up? Tyson with Thibs would be gold.

Deng with Melo in the frontline? Deng's contract is also 1 year shorter than Tyson.


I know this is a bit off target, but you make a great point with the center being the new thing.. not many teams have a big like hibbert, who can just flat out change games.. I was looking at the sixers and Bynum, if he returns to form, it won't take long for that sixer team to be a factor... so while I agree with trading chandler, we better get some big able bodies in return.

absolutely. Even a limited Big lit Chandler is better than no true big. To bad there are so few "game changing" centers out there.

Thank goodness there are so few, cuz unless you have one then Tyson is a good alternative!

Remember his Championship pedigree?

DPOY?
Olympian?
Warrior?
Leadership qualities?
Good lockerroom presence?

Guys, really? I appreciate the ideas exchange but we ready to move him for whom?
WHich mystical presence do we have in which we can replace him?

Hibbert at this moment is way in teh discussion for finals MVP. I know it hurts the Starphuchers to have been defeated by such a "common" group as Indy was, but reality is what it is.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
5/29/2013  3:07 PM
DurzoBlint wrote:
tkf wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:Hibbert is the new thing. Well...having a big center is not really new but in today's NBA it is a new thing and teams do their usual dance of copycat.

Chicago is going to be looking for somebody to match up with Hibbert and they have some identical parts they can send out.

Would you trade Tyson for Deng straight up? Tyson with Thibs would be gold.

Deng with Melo in the frontline? Deng's contract is also 1 year shorter than Tyson.


I know this is a bit off target, but you make a great point with the center being the new thing.. not many teams have a big like hibbert, who can just flat out change games.. I was looking at the sixers and Bynum, if he returns to form, it won't take long for that sixer team to be a factor... so while I agree with trading chandler, we better get some big able bodies in return.

absolutely. Even a limited Big lit Chandler is better than no true big. To bad there are so few "game changing" centers out there.

yep, and the problem just wan't chandler.. when he came out, we went with kenyon who was just too small...

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119
5/29/2013  3:52 PM
I'm not opposed to getting a SF. Melo is best at the 4 but I think we need better guard play
nyshakespeare
Posts: 20527
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/23/2003
Member: #420
USA
5/29/2013  4:09 PM
Chandler is still a top ten legit center in the NBA.
Some might even argue top five, depending on what you're
looking for in a center.

I know sports is what have you done for me lately, but
does anyone remember the three straight 20-rebound games.
Definitely top five in on-ball, help side and pick-and-roll
defense. Second in the NBA in 2-point field goal percentage,
at a healthy 63.8 percent and a year removed from winning
Defensive Player of the Year. One of the few off the court
good guys. He was also one of the few rocks during the regular
season that didn't miss that many games.

To replace him, you're either going to have to take a chance
on a knucklehead that could go off any moment or roll the
(Mc)Dyess on an oft-injured player.

It Is Solved By Walking
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/29/2013  4:40 PM
Nalod wrote:.........and who is our center?

Melo and Novak split time at center!
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Tyson for Deng?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy