[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

To continue a discussion in another thread but giving it it's own subject re Mike Muscala
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/24/2013  4:21 PM
I think that one of our prime directives in last off season was to find 6-11 lengthy PF's to help Tyson Chandler out--that is why we traded and signed for Rasheed and Camby.

I think like others I've kind of discounted Muscala as a small C --but when you stop and think and just look at his tapes--you see a lengthy PF who can play in and out who is being overlooked--I have overlooked him as well--until today.(with a pitch out to Bonn)

A. Scoring-has both post moves and a beautiful jumpshot out to 3 pt land(first at the combine in shooting%)
B Defense and rebounding--he averaged 11.2 rebounds and 2.5 blocks--did not matter level of comp was just as good against tier 1 college programs and Patriot league
C Athletiscm and length --he measured out at the combine at 6-11.5 with a 7-1 wingspan and one of the best verticals for a big man at nearly 34 inches with good end to end speed-- he was .5 inches taller than his first direct competition in Gourgi Dieng


Lets also take into account that this man was double and tripled EVERY single game and played out of position. He is an NBA 4 playing college 5. What separates him from Dieng imho is his advanced and diverse offensive skills. Hes proven to be just as good a shot blocker as Dieng a better rebounder than Deng and what appears to be a better athlete than Deng. He appears to be more mobile and agile as well. He has the ability to handle/score with both hands has advanced footwork and might be the best pick and pop prospect in this draft.

When I look at what I like for C--when I saw a guy like Vucevic--number 1 you loved that he was the legit 7-0260 with all of the advanced skills. Its kind of easy to then break it down and say this is going to be a really good NBA player--albeit he was drafted much later than his talent. After watching tapes on Muscala the lat 2 of hours--Muscala is a Vucevic from the 4. I think that is why he is being discounted--hes being categorized out of his NBA position

RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/24/2013  4:46 PM
Sounds good to me. It appears that we'll have some decent options about where this team will pick. Can't say that there are no good role player prospects in this draft. We need a competent NBA BB skills player with size.
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
5/24/2013  4:52 PM
Dieng is the second coming of a crappy version of Diop. No thanks.
LivingLegend
Posts: 25742
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 8/13/2007
Member: #1645

5/24/2013  5:11 PM
BRIGGS wrote:I think that one of our prime directives in last off season was to find 6-11 lengthy PF's to help Tyson Chandler out--that is why we traded and signed for Rasheed and Camby.

I think like others I've kind of discounted Muscala as a small C --but when you stop and think and just look at his tapes--you see a lengthy PF who can play in and out who is being overlooked--I have overlooked him as well--until today.(with a pitch out to Bonn)

A. Scoring-has both post moves and a beautiful jumpshot out to 3 pt land(first at the combine in shooting%)
B Defense and rebounding--he averaged 11.2 rebounds and 2.5 blocks--did not matter level of comp was just as good against tier 1 college programs and Patriot league
C Athletiscm and length --he measured out at the combine at 6-11.5 with a 7-1 wingspan and one of the best verticals for a big man at nearly 34 inches with good end to end speed-- he was .5 inches taller than his first direct competition in Gourgi Dieng


Lets also take into account that this man was double and tripled EVERY single game and played out of position. He is an NBA 4 playing college 5. What separates him from Dieng imho is his advanced and diverse offensive skills. Hes proven to be just as good a shot blocker as Dieng a better rebounder than Deng and what appears to be a better athlete than Deng. He appears to be more mobile and agile as well. He has the ability to handle/score with both hands has advanced footwork and might be the best pick and pop prospect in this draft.

When I look at what I like for C--when I saw a guy like Vucevic--number 1 you loved that he was the legit 7-0260 with all of the advanced skills. Its kind of easy to then break it down and say this is going to be a really good NBA player--albeit he was drafted much later than his talent. After watching tapes on Muscala the lat 2 of hours--Muscala is a Vucevic from the 4. I think that is why he is being discounted--hes being categorized out of his NBA position

Looking at his draft express video review --- you could argue that his style of play - variety of post moves - the way he runs - his frame are similar to Kevin McHale.

callmened
Posts: 24448
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/26/2012
Member: #4234

5/24/2013  6:02 PM
Mike Mussina?!?!

i never heard of this guy briggs...please elaborate

Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39933
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

5/24/2013  9:54 PM
I like Muscala too, although I disagree with you about Deng. I think both guys can help us.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
5/24/2013  10:56 PM
I never heard of him before you mentioned him but this is a great article talking about him.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/college-basketball/news/20130201/mike-muscala-bucknell/
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
5/24/2013  11:51 PM
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
5/25/2013  1:45 AM
better post game than amare.

great J.

surprised he is only 1 inch taller than novak.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

5/25/2013  2:10 AM
I'm surprised no one has suggested that his game is a bit similar to David Lee's.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/25/2013  1:47 PM
Caseloads wrote:better post game than amare.

great J.

surprised he is only 1 inch taller than novak.

Some of these Pg will fall whether green wolters Someone of value will fall. When we talked of. We weren't talking 6 -11 shot blocker with excellent offensive skills

RIP Crushalot😞
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
5/25/2013  1:52 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
Caseloads wrote:better post game than amare.

great J.

surprised he is only 1 inch taller than novak.

Some of these Pg will fall whether green wolters Someone of value will fall. When we talked of. We weren't talking 6 -11 shot blocker with excellent offensive skills

Do you think there is anyway the Knicks move next years second round pick(Brewer trade)to acquire a second rounder or another first this year?
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
5/25/2013  2:10 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/25/2013  2:28 PM
he reminds of a Troy Murphy with less athleticism and not as good of a shooter in his better years
I don't think he fits well with Tyson Chandler *unless Chandler regains his mobility/speed/athleticism/strength and is a solid 1v1 defender and good help defender*
A lot of Chandler's improved rebounds have come from *TAP OUT's that should NOT be counted as a rebound but recently did*
For Tyson to be successful he must be the only weak link on the floor and play with a versatile SF and PF, including a PG that has the ability to penetrate and do a bit of everything
The team must also be aggressive and solid on DEF with good BB IQ and quite honestly, we didn't have that in addition to the health problems and effort problems of Chandler this play offs

They are just too slow as they both need to work on their speed with a better philosophy on OFFENSE than ISO to get role players involved in a system
As I suggested earlier, Camby was in Woodson's doghouse and DID NOT play because Woodson's loyalty to Chandler/Amare/Martin rather than "his injury of planter faciletes
He has always been productive when given 20-30minutes a game in his entire career and was NOT when playing under 15minutes a game
I still believe he can contribute at a high level and could be no worse than what Tyson Chandler was playing in this year's playoffs if given the chance


How Muscula develops, continues to work hard, and if he reaches his full potential is another story
To me, he is a 2nd round pick and not worthy of a our pick unless we trade down for him like Nate Walters, Pierre Jackson, both McCullums', with a few other players like Solomin Hill
I really like Pierre Jackson and see a bit of Nate Robinson with real PG skills unlike Nate's earlier years, and being a poor man's version of Cp3

For our pick, my opinion would be, we need to either upgrade PG *with speed/quickness to initiate the OFFENSE* or SF possibly SF/PF that can do a bit of EVERYTHING
We have 2 SG's in Smith/Iman that one play's SF and is just too small to defend Paul George/Lebron/Durant/Rudy Gay etc


Shane Larkin *which I think Pacer's will grab right before us*

Giannis Atedembo *he is a project, very young, is quite raw, but but his potential is quite high*
He is the SF/PF with all round skills, athleticism, length, versatility, all round skills, and huge hands
is only 18 and could still be growing as he continues to fill out body *only about 200 pds) and reminds me of a bit between AK47 and Ibaka

Both solid players that likely be ready to contribute right away but with less "potential"
Sergey Karasev a very good shooter that is a SF with good all round skills, and plays within a TEAM CONCEPT
Glen Rice JR with a taste of playing with D League and carrying the team to the finals

Both have good potential and can contribute but slightly too high for our pick
Allen Crabbe
Archie Goodwin

With Pablo and Copeland, I don't think it worth using our mini MLE to keep and I am 50/50 about Copeland *I think he is worth it but we have so many positions to fill and Woodson just doesn't utilize him to his strengths for the "big names like Amare and players that coach likes"
Say we can package both of them to The Spur's for a combined 5m trade exemption and 2 2nd round picks, one in this year's draft and next years draft, it is something we have to consider *would prefer Spur's 1st round pick this year but doubt that is happening*

Unless we can find a taker for Tyson CHandler to a team like Portland for multiple 2nd round picks (they have picks 38,39,45 this year), our 2nd round pick last summer *says he wants out of Portland*, and the trade exemption of 10-14m
Again, this isn't about getting value for Chandler himself, it is about going under the luxury tax, and regaining the flexibility/asset's/exemptions with 10-14m/ 5m MLE vs 3m mini mle, and possibly even the 2m Bi Annual Exemption
If we made a move like this I would be in favoring of keeping Copeland

But with Kidd already here, I just don't think Pablo is worth keeping with Felton unable to defend PG *for majority of the league* and SG's *for the contenders*
I think we just need much more speed on both ends of the floor on DEF and OFF, penetration, and ability to facilitate the team

With our 2nd year players in Q, Earl Barron, trade exemption in Brewer, + 150% rule, 3m in cash, I would target players *that are realistic options* like

Brandon Rush - he is coming of a knee injury but has a player option for 4m on 1 year
He was very efficient player in limited minutes, REB/DEF/1 block + 1 STEAL/ and had good length/athleticism

Barea(probably more realistic without including assets and just salary dump)

Ridnour/Sessions *would most likely require an asset with at least a 2nd round pick*
Nelson *not sure how we can get him since he has a higher salary though*

I wouldn't mind James Johnson as a vet min player and would give him a 2 year contract
We just need much more size in our SF/PF department
Stephen Jackson/Ron Artest(if amnestied) would fit the younger SF/PF as vet min contract is
Thing is we don't have much roster spots and Chris Wright would hold one as well while we need upgrades in many positions with a youth movement that can contribute and still continue to develop for our future


With all the players like Rhondo/Rose/Granger and team's improving with salary cap/exemptions/amenstied possibilities it would be a much tougher next season as this year was likely our best chance in going all the way/at least ECF
Scary thing about Pacer's is they could still trade Granger or at least amnesty him while still having the ability to go after a max layer like Cp3 or 2-3 solid players while keeping their core together with the development of Plumlee as their PF/C in his 2nd year

Still remember some poster's saying "PACER"S DO NOT strike fear in me"
Well Paul George is a big reason of their improvements that is a max talent that does not have EGO issues and plays well in all aspect's of the game in terms of DEF/Facilitating/Scoring or doing whatever is needed without for the benefit of the team rather than playing like he thinks he is a LEGEND already
His ability to defend Melo/Lebron 1v1 with Hibbert in the back helping is a big part of the Pacer's success with his combination of size/length/athleticism/ and all round skills
He is already more talented than Melo in all aspects of the game *besides scoring* and is only going to get better, while his "max pay" will be 5-10m less than what Melo could be starting at for his next contract in a Joe Johnson type deal
His talent is comparable to a younger Tmac/Grant Hill and with great DEF plus work ethic

callmened
Posts: 24448
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/26/2012
Member: #4234

5/25/2013  2:24 PM
BRIGGS!! You done did it again!! Where did you find this guy? VERY imprssive. Regardless of where he ends up. Hell be a solid nba player. Reminds me of a young brad miller. He needs to grow into his body but he has great potential!! He might not get drafted cuz of "politics" (small school but id give him a shot)
Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

5/25/2013  2:33 PM
RonRon wrote:he reminds of a Troy Murphy with less athleticism and not as good of a shooter in his better years
I don't think he fits well with Tyson Chandler *unless Chandler regains his mobility/speed/athleticism/strength and is a solid 1v1 defender and good help defender*
A lot of Chandler's improved rebounds have come from *TAP OUT's that should NOT be counted as a rebound but recently did*
They are just too slow as they both need to work on their speed with a better philosophy on OFFENSE than ISO to get role players involved in a system
As I suggested earlier, Camby was in Woodson's doghouse and DID NOT play because Woodson's loyalty to Chandler/Amare/Martin rather than "his injury of planter faciletes
He has always been productive when given 20-30minutes a game in his entire career and was NOT when playing under 15minutes a game
I still believe he can contribute at a high level and could be no worse than what Tyson Chandler was playing in this year's playoffs if given the chance


How Muscula develops, continues to work hard, and if he reaches his full potential is another story
To me, he is a 2nd round pick and not worthy of a our pick unless we trade down for him like Nate Walters, Pierre Jackson, both McCullums', with a few other players like Solomin Hill

For our pick, my opinion would be, we need to either upgrade PG or SF possibly SF/PF
We have 2 SG's in Smith/Iman that one play's SF and is just too small to defend Paul George/Lebron/Durant/Rudy Gay etc


Shane Larkin *which I think Pacer's will grab right before us*

Giannis Atedembo *he is a project, very young, is quite raw, but but his potential is quite high*
He is the SF/PF with all round skills, athleticism, length, versatility, all round skills, and huge hands
is only 18 and could still be growing as he continues to fill out body *only about 200 pds) and reminds me of a bit between AK47 and Ibaka

Both solid players that likely be ready to contribute right away but with less "potential"
Sergey Karasev a very good shooter that is a SF with good all round skills, and plays within a TEAM CONCEPT
Glen Rice JR with a taste of playing with D League and carrying the team to the finals

Both have good potential and can contribute but slightly too high for our pick
Allen Crabbe
Archie Goodwin

With Pablo and Copeland, I don't think it worth using our mini MLE to keep and I am 50/50 about Copeland *I think he is worth it but we have so many positions to fill and Woodson just doesn't utilize him to his strengths for the "big names like Amare and players that coach likes"
Say we can package both of them to The Spur's for a combined 5m trade exemption and 2 2nd round picks, one in this year's draft and next years draft, it is something we have to consider *would prefer Spur's 1st round pick this year but doubt that is happening*

Unless we can find a taker for Tyson CHandler to a team like Portland for multiple 2nd round picks (they have picks 38,39,45 this year), our 2nd round pick last summer *says he wants out of Portland*, and the trade exemption of 10-14m
Again, this isn't about getting value for Chandler himself, it is about going under the luxury tax, and regaining the flexibility/asset's/exemptions with 10-14m/ 5m MLE vs 3m mini mle, and possibly even the 2m Bi Annual Exemption
If we made a move like this I would be in favoring of keeping Copeland

But with Kidd already here, I just don't think Pablo is worth keeping with Felton unable to defend PG *for majority of the league* and SG's *for the contenders*
I think we just need much more speed on both ends of the floor on DEF and OFF, penetration, and ability to facilitate the team

With our 2nd year players in Q, Earl Barron, trade exemption in Brewer, + 150% rule, I would target players like

Brandon Rush - he is coming of a knee injury but has a player option for 4m on 1 year
He was very efficient player in limited minutes, REB/DEF/1 block + 1 STEAL/ and had good length/athleticism

Barea(probably more realistic without including assets and just salary dump)

Ridnour/Sessions *would most likely require an asset with at least a 2nd round pick*


I wouldn't mind James Johnson as a vet min player and would give him a 2 year contract
We just need much more size in our SF/PF department
Stephen Jackson/Ron Artest(if amnestied) would fit the younger SF/PF as vet min contract is
Thing is we don't have much roster spots and Chris Wright would hold one as well while we need upgrades in many positions with a youth movement that can contribute and still continue to develop for our future


With all the players like Rhondo/Rose/Granger and team's improving with salary cap/exemptions/amenstied possibilities it would be a much tougher next season as this year was likely our best chance in going all the way/at least ECF
Scary thing about Pacer's is they could still trade Granger or at least amnesty him while still having the ability to go after a max layer like Cp3 or 2-3 solid players while keeping their core together with the development of Plumlee as their PF/C in his 2nd year

Still remember some poster's saying "PACER"S DO NOT strike fear in me"
Well Paul George is a big reason of their improvements that is a max talent that does not have EGO issues and plays well in all aspect's of the game in terms of DEF/Facilitating/Scoring or doing whatever is needed without for the benefit of the team rather than playing like he thinks he is a LEGEND already
His ability to defend Melo/Lebron 1v1 with Hibbert in the back helping is a big part of the Pacer's success with his combination of size/length/athleticism/ and all round skills
He is already more talented than Melo in all aspects of the game *besides scoring* and is only going to get better, while his "max pay" will be 5-10m less than what Melo could be starting at for his next contract in a Joe Johnson type deal
His talent is comparable to a younger Tmac/Grant Hill and with great DEF plus work ethic

You keep saying second round picks but that does not create anything. You need 1st round picks or players because you have no assets to offer a team in a S&T to take advantage of the exception space. If you get the 10th pick, Pap, and Leonard/2nd rounder. Then that is a decent trade borderline bad.

callmened
Posts: 24448
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/26/2012
Member: #4234

5/25/2013  2:43 PM
Ronron...im in a barber shop right now here in harlem. Ill get to your insiteful post later.

Ps...its amazing how badly new yorkers want the knicks to win. Its also nauseating that they will sell their soul to do it ("man we should get 'truth' pierce). They look at me strangely when i try to explain the cap situation. Lol

Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
5/25/2013  3:02 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/25/2013  3:17 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
RonRon wrote:he reminds of a Troy Murphy with less athleticism and not as good of a shooter in his better years
I don't think he fits well with Tyson Chandler *unless Chandler regains his mobility/speed/athleticism/strength and is a solid 1v1 defender and good help defender*
A lot of Chandler's improved rebounds have come from *TAP OUT's that should NOT be counted as a rebound but recently did*
They are just too slow as they both need to work on their speed with a better philosophy on OFFENSE than ISO to get role players involved in a system
As I suggested earlier, Camby was in Woodson's doghouse and DID NOT play because Woodson's loyalty to Chandler/Amare/Martin rather than "his injury of planter faciletes
He has always been productive when given 20-30minutes a game in his entire career and was NOT when playing under 15minutes a game
I still believe he can contribute at a high level and could be no worse than what Tyson Chandler was playing in this year's playoffs if given the chance


How Muscula develops, continues to work hard, and if he reaches his full potential is another story
To me, he is a 2nd round pick and not worthy of a our pick unless we trade down for him like Nate Walters, Pierre Jackson, both McCullums', with a few other players like Solomin Hill

For our pick, my opinion would be, we need to either upgrade PG or SF possibly SF/PF
We have 2 SG's in Smith/Iman that one play's SF and is just too small to defend Paul George/Lebron/Durant/Rudy Gay etc


Shane Larkin *which I think Pacer's will grab right before us*

Giannis Atedembo *he is a project, very young, is quite raw, but but his potential is quite high*
He is the SF/PF with all round skills, athleticism, length, versatility, all round skills, and huge hands
is only 18 and could still be growing as he continues to fill out body *only about 200 pds) and reminds me of a bit between AK47 and Ibaka

Both solid players that likely be ready to contribute right away but with less "potential"
Sergey Karasev a very good shooter that is a SF with good all round skills, and plays within a TEAM CONCEPT
Glen Rice JR with a taste of playing with D League and carrying the team to the finals

Both have good potential and can contribute but slightly too high for our pick
Allen Crabbe
Archie Goodwin

With Pablo and Copeland, I don't think it worth using our mini MLE to keep and I am 50/50 about Copeland *I think he is worth it but we have so many positions to fill and Woodson just doesn't utilize him to his strengths for the "big names like Amare and players that coach likes"
Say we can package both of them to The Spur's for a combined 5m trade exemption and 2 2nd round picks, one in this year's draft and next years draft, it is something we have to consider *would prefer Spur's 1st round pick this year but doubt that is happening*

Unless we can find a taker for Tyson CHandler to a team like Portland for multiple 2nd round picks (they have picks 38,39,45 this year), our 2nd round pick last summer *says he wants out of Portland*, and the trade exemption of 10-14m
Again, this isn't about getting value for Chandler himself, it is about going under the luxury tax, and regaining the flexibility/asset's/exemptions with 10-14m/ 5m MLE vs 3m mini mle, and possibly even the 2m Bi Annual Exemption
If we made a move like this I would be in favoring of keeping Copeland

But with Kidd already here, I just don't think Pablo is worth keeping with Felton unable to defend PG *for majority of the league* and SG's *for the contenders*
I think we just need much more speed on both ends of the floor on DEF and OFF, penetration, and ability to facilitate the team

With our 2nd year players in Q, Earl Barron, trade exemption in Brewer, + 150% rule, I would target players like

Brandon Rush - he is coming of a knee injury but has a player option for 4m on 1 year
He was very efficient player in limited minutes, REB/DEF/1 block + 1 STEAL/ and had good length/athleticism

Barea(probably more realistic without including assets and just salary dump)

Ridnour/Sessions *would most likely require an asset with at least a 2nd round pick*


I wouldn't mind James Johnson as a vet min player and would give him a 2 year contract
We just need much more size in our SF/PF department
Stephen Jackson/Ron Artest(if amnestied) would fit the younger SF/PF as vet min contract is
Thing is we don't have much roster spots and Chris Wright would hold one as well while we need upgrades in many positions with a youth movement that can contribute and still continue to develop for our future


With all the players like Rhondo/Rose/Granger and team's improving with salary cap/exemptions/amenstied possibilities it would be a much tougher next season as this year was likely our best chance in going all the way/at least ECF
Scary thing about Pacer's is they could still trade Granger or at least amnesty him while still having the ability to go after a max layer like Cp3 or 2-3 solid players while keeping their core together with the development of Plumlee as their PF/C in his 2nd year

Still remember some poster's saying "PACER"S DO NOT strike fear in me"
Well Paul George is a big reason of their improvements that is a max talent that does not have EGO issues and plays well in all aspect's of the game in terms of DEF/Facilitating/Scoring or doing whatever is needed without for the benefit of the team rather than playing like he thinks he is a LEGEND already
His ability to defend Melo/Lebron 1v1 with Hibbert in the back helping is a big part of the Pacer's success with his combination of size/length/athleticism/ and all round skills
He is already more talented than Melo in all aspects of the game *besides scoring* and is only going to get better, while his "max pay" will be 5-10m less than what Melo could be starting at for his next contract in a Joe Johnson type deal
His talent is comparable to a younger Tmac/Grant Hill and with great DEF plus work ethic

You keep saying second round picks but that does not create anything. You need 1st round picks or players because you have no assets to offer a team in a S&T to take advantage of the exception space. If you get the 10th pick, Pap, and Leonard/2nd rounder. Then that is a decent trade borderline bad.

@yellowboy

It isn't what you want or what we need, it is what Chandler is worth
At 14m, be happy if a team is willing to take on his contract, and if you think his playoff run is worthy of a 1st round pick you are lying to yourself
AGAIN, by trading him to a team under the salary cap,

1- we gain a 14m trade exemption (that we can use in a trade or sign a FA)
2- go under the tax threshold which would allow us to participate in Sign and Trades
3- allow's us to keep Copeland/Pablo and even utilize Camby vs NOT USING HIM AT ALL while he can or may not be effective *but with Tyson here Woodson will not use him*
4- the 2nd round picks we could use in potential trades, euro stash talent, and high risk/high reward type players
5- have the 5m MLE to use with 2m Bi annual Exemption, while freeing up roster spots, it was obvious we needed upgrades in many position, and vet min players are just not good enough to surround around our team

Yes, I would like a 1st round pick, but it is very unlikely with the way he is played this play offs, and the benefits of trading him are in the above
The same reason why Rudy Gay was traded for NOTHING while he is much more talented than Chandler
The value IS NOT IN THE TRADE ITSELF, it is in the advantages that also come with the 14m trade exemption and being under the tax threshold

Chandler's production in the play offs was worse than a vet min player as he was unable to defend Hibbert 1v1 or help in REB/DEF/HELP DEF/SHOT BLOCKING/and while being a huge liability on Offense as Hibbert was defending him and whoever tried to get in the paint
What was even worse was his EFFORT mixed with his lack of mobility and he should have never opened his mouth
He often did not cut to the basket or contest shot layups, and fight for position, allowing Hibbert to always get position for the offensive rebound

Chandler needs to be next to a REAL stretch 4, with legit SF's, and a very good PG, he must be the only weak link on the floor while all 4 other plays must be able to hit a 3point shot
Aldridge can play shoot right inside the 3point line and play outside/in and inside out, while both Love and Aldridge would both benefit on DEF if Chandler is closer to the play of last season, we honestly don't have the team to utilize Chandler's potential
He was once a solid all round DEFENDER but not dominant by any means and he needs the team to have the abilities to do so, in Batuum he has that 1 player with LA's length/athleticism/verstility
IE Dirk is NOT considered a good defender by any means but he was very good as Dirk/Chandler complimented each other with the rest of the team with Marion/Barea/Terry/a younger Kidd/Stevenson and Brewer


Had we not traded for Melo, I can see Chandler being very good with that team if we signed him as a FA, while trading for our "STAR" in a trade without overpaying
We could have still signed Lin and traded for Cp3/Deron/Harden with that team with the assets we parted with
Players that play within a TEAM concept, have good BB IQ, and play hard on both ends off the floor
Instead we chose the exact opposite and Chandler just does not FIT


Portland, Twolves, and OKC, are some teams that have the ability to utilize Chandler at his best but for our best chances in improving the entire roster is by gaining the 14m trade exemption *which makes us a possibility for CP3 in addition to ALL OF THE ABOVE*

yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

5/25/2013  3:26 PM
See there is no reason to have the trade exception if you do not have any assets to use in a sign and trade. It may open up some little deals but nothing that would improve the team. Also, I did not vote Tyson first team D. That was the coaches. I think teams still value Tyson a bit and in this draft a first rounder for Tyson should be a given. I know about his production in the playoffs but the Blazer, OkC, and LA maybe desperate enough to take Tyson to fill a huge need.

OKC it would be about Paul and Paul only. He reportedly doesn't like Blake or Griffin so they could do something to make him happy.

Blazers badly wants a "defensive Center". First Team Tyson fits that.

T'Wolves, I do not know why the T'wolves would take Tyson over Peko. Unless Saunders value Tyson more and wants a little more defensive rebounding.


Side Note:

What is Al-Farouq Aminu going for this summer? Yes he has been a disappointment but I would take a flyer on him for the vet min. N.O. didn't even pick up his option so I don't think his value is high. Tell him to defend, rebound, and work with Hopla. I think this young player could become a nice role player.

RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
5/25/2013  6:11 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/25/2013  6:31 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:See there is no reason to have the trade exception if you do not have any assets to use in a sign and trade. It may open up some little deals but nothing that would improve the team. Also, I did not vote Tyson first team D. That was the coaches. I think teams still value Tyson a bit and in this draft a first rounder for Tyson should be a given. I know about his production in the playoffs but the Blazer, OkC, and LA maybe desperate enough to take Tyson to fill a huge need.

OKC it would be about Paul and Paul only. He reportedly doesn't like Blake or Griffin so they could do something to make him happy.

Blazers badly wants a "defensive Center". First Team Tyson fits that.

T'Wolves, I do not know why the T'wolves would take Tyson over Peko. Unless Saunders value Tyson more and wants a little more defensive rebounding.


Side Note:

What is Al-Farouq Aminu going for this summer? Yes he has been a disappointment but I would take a flyer on him for the vet min. N.O. didn't even pick up his option so I don't think his value is high. Tell him to defend, rebound, and work with Hopla. I think this young player could become a nice role player.


14m is a nice amount to chase any player with
Cp3 can probably get more but NO WHERE would he be able to market himself better than NYC
All State and many endorsements deals would be headed our way if he signs a 3 year deal with an opt out after 2nd which is when we can have the ability to resign
Lin is a complete joke when compared to Cp3 and I think SIGNING him with that 14 exemption is the closest we can get in building a team around Melo


Melo
Cp3
Amare (till the end of 2015) maybe in 2015 we can form a big 3 of Melo/Cp3/Aldridge or Love
JR
Iman

MLE
1st round pick

Pablo/Copeland to keep or send to a team like SA for 2nd round picks and salary exemption of about 5m together??

whatever 2nd round picks we acquire to get from Portland as they own picks 39,40, and 45
whether to use euro stash talent/high risk high reward development players/ or players that can contribute right away like Solomon Hill, Ryan Kelly

and another player in 2015 FA class to longer deals


About Al Farouq Aminu, he is the same guy that some here said was already better than Wilson Chandler
Those same people that said we won the Melo trade....


trade for Cp3
vs
Melo

Eric Gordon (is he really better than Gallo)
Aminu (are they better than Gallo/Chandler?)
1 1st round lottery pick from Cleveland is this better than 1 Knicks pick in 2014, swap in 2016, 2 GS 2nd round picks *one of which was predicted an early 2nd round pick*

AR worth a 2nd round pick at the time?
forget about the 40m we saved in salary + more in taxes with Curry's contract
Felton that turned in to Portland's 1st rounder and Andre Miller

RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
5/25/2013  6:16 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/25/2013  6:29 PM
back to the point, If Cp3 is willing to sign for that 14m deal with us

I would even go as for and throw in our own 1st rounder to Portland in exchange for


our euro player we selected in last year's draft

picks
39
40
45

and

2 future 2nd round picks

Our worse case scenario
Start Camby because he CANNOT BE WORSE THAN Tyson Chandler was in the play offs
While with Cp3, Melo, players might actually consider signing with us instead of Miami at a lower price, knowing we won't be playing ISO BALL with Cp3 here

for instance

Matt Barnes
Dunleavey
Tony Allen

Speights??
Blatche??


Kmart/Birdman on 2 year vet min deals

while Felton/JR/Melo will have less responsibilities in facilitating and running the team
Especially Melo when it comes to "leadership" and we get a PG in which he can trust and respect to DENY him the ball and NOT play ISO more than 50-70% of the time shooting 29 score 28 pts, pushing the ball/tempo and giving it to him in spots INSIDE and the paint


Iman and Cp3 will have a lot of steals together


Melo is what he he is, a scorer not a leader/facilitator, but he needs to learn to be more efficient and doing other stuff as well
While he is unable to make players around him better, Cp3 does exactly that and provides much more

Starphuking at it's highest, while using those 2nd round picks as players to develop/stash in high risk/high reward to develop and maybe even use in future trades as they develop value and show potential

To continue a discussion in another thread but giving it it's own subject re Mike Muscala

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy