can we trade chandler to clips for deandre and bledsoe

GoNyGoNyGo wrote:who the hell wants him after that?

teams will take him, they did not see what we saw with the same eyes,

probably only a passive recognition of his failure, they do not understand how truly corrupt this player is,

so someone will take him because he will help a team a little bit maybe in the regular season,

we're just better off without him after the wounds he's inflicted this series, the team hinges around his defensive talents and he has failed miserably in his supposedly strongest area,

gotta get a guy that will bang hard and maybe be a little old fashioned in that he will do dirty work, grab boards and just go hard,

we need a grunt at center next to melo,

and tyson isn't a grunt, he's a delicate flower that shrivels when you need him most,

Chandler for gordon and lopez?

Caseloads wrote:can we trade chandler to sac for crazy man child demarcus cuzzins

can we trade chandler to clips for deandre and bledsoe

No way, Cousins is way too talented to give up on this soon and Tyson adds nothing to a terrible team like Sacramento.

The most logical destination for a Tyson trade would be to a good team looking to upgrade center to put them over the top. Also, any Tyson trade needs to have a center coming back to us. Around the trade deadline I thought LAC, GS, and OKC were the best fits in terms of fit and need but I don't think that's the case anymore; GS is not trading Bogut after the postseason he just had and I want nothing to do with Perkins so both those teams are out. Looking around the league today I think the most likely trade partners are LAC, for DeAndre and Bledsoe, or Denver for a package involving Javale McGee.

My big hope this offseason is that we can upgrade our shaky, inconsistent backcourt. We should be willing to take a slight downgrade at center for an upgrade at guard. And I believe Tyson still has plenty of value around the league; he was voted into the AllStar game by the coaches and then All-Defensive 1st team by those same coaches.

VCoug wrote:

Caseloads wrote:can we trade chandler to sac for crazy man child demarcus cuzzins

can we trade chandler to clips for deandre and bledsoe

No way, Cousins is way too talented to give up on this soon and Tyson adds nothing to a terrible team like Sacramento.

The most logical destination for a Tyson trade would be to a good team looking to upgrade center to put them over the top. Also, any Tyson trade needs to have a center coming back to us. Around the trade deadline I thought LAC, GS, and OKC were the best fits in terms of fit and need but I don't think that's the case anymore; GS is not trading Bogut after the postseason he just had and I want nothing to do with Perkins so both those teams are out. Looking around the league today I think the most likely trade partners are LAC, for DeAndre and Bledsoe, or Denver for a package involving Javale McGee.

My big hope this offseason is that we can upgrade our shaky, inconsistent backcourt. We should be willing to take a slight downgrade at center for an upgrade at guard. And I believe Tyson still has plenty of value around the league; he was voted into the AllStar game by the coaches and then All-Defensive 1st team by those same coaches.

Knicks need a PF too can't have Melo being out of position.

VCoug wrote:

Caseloads wrote:can we trade chandler to sac for crazy man child demarcus cuzzins

can we trade chandler to clips for deandre and bledsoe

No way, Cousins is way too talented to give up on this soon and Tyson adds nothing to a terrible team like Sacramento.

The most logical destination for a Tyson trade would be to a good team looking to upgrade center to put them over the top. Also, any Tyson trade needs to have a center coming back to us. Around the trade deadline I thought LAC, GS, and OKC were the best fits in terms of fit and need but I don't think that's the case anymore; GS is not trading Bogut after the postseason he just had and I want nothing to do with Perkins so both those teams are out. Looking around the league today I think the most likely trade partners are LAC, for DeAndre and Bledsoe, or Denver for a package involving Javale McGee.

My big hope this offseason is that we can upgrade our shaky, inconsistent backcourt. We should be willing to take a slight downgrade at center for an upgrade at guard. And I believe Tyson still has plenty of value around the league; he was voted into the AllStar game by the coaches and then All-Defensive 1st team by those same coaches.

Even consider PHX.

VCoug wrote:

Vmart wrote:

VCoug wrote:

Caseloads wrote:can we trade chandler to sac for crazy man child demarcus cuzzins

can we trade chandler to clips for deandre and bledsoe

No way, Cousins is way too talented to give up on this soon and Tyson adds nothing to a terrible team like Sacramento.

The most logical destination for a Tyson trade would be to a good team looking to upgrade center to put them over the top. Also, any Tyson trade needs to have a center coming back to us. Around the trade deadline I thought LAC, GS, and OKC were the best fits in terms of fit and need but I don't think that's the case anymore; GS is not trading Bogut after the postseason he just had and I want nothing to do with Perkins so both those teams are out. Looking around the league today I think the most likely trade partners are LAC, for DeAndre and Bledsoe, or Denver for a package involving Javale McGee.

My big hope this offseason is that we can upgrade our shaky, inconsistent backcourt. We should be willing to take a slight downgrade at center for an upgrade at guard. And I believe Tyson still has plenty of value around the league; he was voted into the AllStar game by the coaches and then All-Defensive 1st team by those same coaches.

Knicks need a PF too can't have Melo being out of position.

I don't think he is out of position at PF. Melo just had maybe the best individual season of his career and we had our best season in over a decade with him playing PF. We also consistently looked much better with him at PF than with a traditional lineup of two bigs and Melo at SF. Even this series, where going small should have been a great disadvantage, when we played a traditional lineup with Tyson at C, Kenyon at PF, and Melo at SF we looked absolutely terrible and we got outrebounded by 8 in that quarter.