... Or can he?
The Knicks’ coordinated, scrambling defense in Game 2 was effective, but more for how it executed than for the ingenuity of the scheme. The Pacers will no doubt respond Saturday with their own adjustments. For instance, sending more cutters to the basket when the Knicks are rotating will make it tougher to cut off passes to the perimeter. - Beckley Mason, NYT (all italics)
The switches and rotations demand instant recognition, but more important, lateral quickness. The feet must always be moving like a featherweight boxer. The hands also must be active, as defections are the only rewards for extra effort. Lateral quickness.
If turnovers are the Pacers’ fatal flaw, inconsistency has been the bane of the Knicks’ defense all season. Having surrendered home-court advantage, it will take a string of disciplined, intelligent games to overcome the Pacers, whose top-ranked defense has not missed a beat all season.
Game 2 offers a blueprint for how the Knicks’ defense can disrupt and befuddle the turnover-prone Pacers, but even fulfilling it is not a guarantee of victory.
Transition basketball and treating every possession with care. Stoudemire must know what he wants tondo with the ball in advance. His compatibility with Melo would be perfect, if there was a 48 second shot clock.
The Pacers still found good shots when they were able to elude the double teams. Despite 15 turnovers through the first three quarters, the Pacers were right in the game until their catastrophic meltdown in the fourth.
Nice timeout coach Vogel. We who are about to take a well-deserved nap, salute you.
Amare can sit with Quentin Richardson and enjoy the view.
Defense