Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 2/2/2004 Member: #581 USA |
![]() Wow, what an idiot. He hasn't accomplished one-tenth of what KG has.
|
Nalod
Posts: 71174 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() Oak could not play in todays NBA. |
ramtour420
Posts: 26283 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 3/19/2007 Member: #1388 Russian Federation |
![]() Bonn1997 wrote:Wow, what an idiot. He hasn't accomplished one-tenth of what KG has. So he is not allowed an opinion? SMH Everything you have ever wanted is on the other side of fear- George Adair
|
Nalod
Posts: 71174 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() ramtour420 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:Wow, what an idiot. He hasn't accomplished one-tenth of what KG has. He does. Who said he can't speak his piece? In return, it is the opinion of some he looks foolish. |
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
![]() Nalod wrote:Oak played 18 years in the nba. He had over 12,000 points and 12,000 rebounds. Are you kidding with this? I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
Nalod
Posts: 71174 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() CrushAlot wrote:Nalod wrote:Oak played 18 years in the nba. He had over 12,000 points and 12,000 rebounds. Are you kidding with this? I know, Oak is legend status now who grows and grows. He is almost a cartoon comic book super hero. THere are plenty of very good NBA players who would not play in todays NBA. Debussure at 6-6 would not be a power forward, he would be wing and his handle was not strong enough to play there. Bill Bradley was too slow to play the 2, and would be now at the 3. Great role players in their day and some of my heroes. But lets be real, the game has changed. 20 years ago it was a more physical game and Oak was up to the challange. His offense was below average. When paired with Ewing it was a very good fit. Next to Chandler, it would be a problem. |
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
![]() Nalod wrote:The game has changed but it would have been nice to have Oak in the NJ game banging some guys. He wasn't a marginal player that fit a role that doesn't exist anymore. He might play center like Chuck Hayes, Dajuan Blair.CrushAlot wrote:Nalod wrote:Oak played 18 years in the nba. He had over 12,000 points and 12,000 rebounds. Are you kidding with this? I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
nehemiah
Posts: 20163 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 2/15/2012 Member: #3928 |
![]() This notion of Bradley and Oak not being able to play today is very shortsighted. The game evolves all the time. Also, don't underestimate a competitor's instinct to adapt and finding ways to be effective. Bradley practiced very hard growing up -- if he were growing up today wanting to be an NBA player, he would taylor his game to be a good player for the present. He would be fine. Oak of course is a very different player -- he would also find a way to be a relevant role player.
|
jrodmc
Posts: 32927 Alba Posts: 50 Joined: 11/24/2004 Member: #805 USA |
![]() Yeah, and we all know Harvard grads can't play in today's NBA.
what a thread full of shit. |
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067 Alba Posts: 3 Joined: 7/10/2006 Member: #1152 USA |
![]() Bonn1997 wrote:Wow, what an idiot. He hasn't accomplished one-tenth of what KG has. but he was absolutely right about Barkley. I hate when former players become studio voices and forget what type of player they were. Barkley was a very average to below average defender. Barkley was known for being politically uncorrect and constantly threw in the public face that "he is and NBA players are not role models."
I also agree about Perk. He had time to put a hard foul on Griff. Hell a flagrent 1 would not have been out of the question imo. You want to put me on a poster like that well, I want to put you on the floor like THIS. So, yeah, that's on you Perk. On to Oak....get over the but hurt of the Camby trade already. We became better without you Oak. Used to love Oak but, he's become such a bitter Old Woman that its hard to give a shyt about him. the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
|
ActionJackson
Posts: 21398 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/5/2007 Member: #1602 |
![]() nehemiah wrote:This notion of Bradley and Oak not being able to play today is very shortsighted. The game evolves all the time. Exactly...not only is the game evolving but the comparison works both ways. maybe Oakley didnt have the skill to guard 4s in todays league but Garnett's wannabe gangsta in a lightweight frame wouldve been broken like a twig if he tried come in the lane against Oak, Mason or the Davis boys!!! |
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067 Alba Posts: 3 Joined: 7/10/2006 Member: #1152 USA |
![]() man, with these weak ass forwards, Oak would average 20 rebounds a game. Oak boxed out and intimidated guys out of rebounds.
the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
|
MarburyAnd1Crossover
Posts: 23120 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 10/24/2011 Member: #3650 |
![]() Oak would just look at the ball and it would rebound into his hands.
Carmelo Anthony is ANTI-BASKETBALL
|
ActionJackson
Posts: 21398 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/5/2007 Member: #1602 |
![]() this is all that need be said about Oak & people that want to pretend to be tough on or off the court...
http://hardboiledfiction.blogspot.com/2006/12/let-me-introduce-to-you-one-bad-ass.html |
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067 Alba Posts: 3 Joined: 7/10/2006 Member: #1152 USA |
![]() MarburyAnd1Crossover wrote:Oak would just look at the ball and it would rebound into his hands. that gave me a good laugh the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
|
Voltron
Posts: 20026 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 2/20/2012 Member: #3962 |
![]() nehemiah wrote:This notion of Bradley and Oak not being able to play today is very shortsighted. The game evolves all the time. Also, don't underestimate a competitor's instinct to adapt and finding ways to be effective. Bradley practiced very hard growing up -- if he were growing up today wanting to be an NBA player, he would taylor his game to be a good player for the present. He would be fine. Oak of course is a very different player -- he would also find a way to be a relevant role player. I agree with that sentiment about how so and so couldn't play in today's game. Possibly if you put Jim Thorpe in a time machine and dropped him into a 2011 championship game, he might not compete well. But if Thorpe, Jim Brown, Wilt Chamberlain, or any other athlete is able to utilize the same advantages that today's athletes have as far as nutrition, strength training, and gained knowledge of the sports from decades, then Thorpe and other athletes from the past would most definitely wreck shop in modern eras. |
BigRedDog
Posts: 22192 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 1/23/2004 Member: #569 |
![]() Nalod wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Nalod wrote:Oak played 18 years in the nba. He had over 12,000 points and 12,000 rebounds. Are you kidding with this? Not sure if you watched the Knicks back then but Bradley DID always play the 3(small forward). I also think Debussure was such a great defensive player and rebounder(boxing out) that he could still flourish at PF. On offense he would have a field day bringing these bigger guys out trying to defend his outside shot. fishmike
9/27/2024 11:00 PM
Ug I hate this. The idea of Towns is great until you see what a pussy he is. Jules is a dog. DD was a flamethrower locked up cheap for 3 more years.
First Leon move I hate
|
Nalod
Posts: 71174 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() BigRedDog wrote:Nalod wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Nalod wrote:Oak played 18 years in the nba. He had over 12,000 points and 12,000 rebounds. Are you kidding with this? Good points about evolution. Don't misconstrue my comments as hate. His numbers spoke for themselves. He complimented Ewing and many of his point were gotten from an effective mid range shot, hustle and being open when Ewing was doubled. Coming out of Virgina Union he made good long career. Perhaps he could have had a "Blair" type game. Not sure he had the wingspan at 6-7. Regarding Bradley, he was a 2 out of college and after spending time in England as a Rhodes scholar he was a 2 his rookie year. He was a bit of a bust being a top college player his senior year and it was not until he moved over to the 3 and Cazzie was traded did he come into his own. I watched a lot of those teams and is the reason I am a knick fan. Bradley as a failed 2 was before my time but I have read so much of the era I am certain of it. A lot was expected out of Dollar Bill! Debussure was a suburb athlete and Possibly would have been a Gallinari (Note white guy comparison) type player but with is height and build not a PF banger. The strong character could have driven him in other ways. Yeah, good points about evolution. what a thread full of ****. Good line. Something "Oak" would say. |
Nalod
Posts: 71174 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() ProfessionalBill Bradley No. 24 |