If it's true that you need legit stars to contend in the NBA--and it is certainly true--then what were the other options? Melo doesn't sign, doesn't it make it tougher to attract other high-end free agents? And since the Miami Superfriends formed, I'm convinced the days of premier NBA free agents are over anyway, so who's to say you could even pick up a marquee name in free agency?
So we don't sign Melo. Then what? We cross our fingers and wait for 2012, uncertain of the new CBA and putting another year of mileage on Amare? Or we cross our fingers and hope that Wil (who most definitely was NOT going to be signed after this year) and/or Gallo turn into stars? I love those guys, but they were both inconsistent this season and seeing them both be on simultaneously was as rare as a JD Salinger sighting. And Felton fell off a cliff for the last month and a half or so.
If it's the mechanics of the deal, with Dolan or Isiah possibly lurking in the shadows, then I get the rancor. Trust me: no one thinks those douches are more pathetic than I do, but no one knows how it REALLY went down right? We've got conflicting reports and that's it.
The sad truth is, lower seeds don't win NBA titles. And unless you have more than one star, you're likely a lower seed. This isn't the any-given-Sunday NFL. Sure we might be able to take a game, maybe two, from Miami or Boston, but not a series. Maybe Melo won't be the Messiah and Mozgov will turn into Soviet-Hakeem and Gallo will get over his aversion to memory foam and morph into a top-shelf baller--but taking a shot while the getting's good is preferable to lovable, but sustained mediocrity, right?