[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

question about Melo and Knicks prospects of a "big 3"
Author Thread
fishmike
Posts: 53837
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/15/2011  9:50 AM
If we trade for Melo is the assumption that he's signing the 3 year $65mm extension that Denver has on the table for him?

2012 Amare makes $20mm. Melo would be more than $20mm. Mosgov (if not traded) makes $2.7mm

So we have $45mm sucked up there.

Am I missing something? Where is the max cap space to sign Chris Paul, Dwight Howard or Deron Williams

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
AUTOADVERT
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

2/15/2011  9:56 AM
fishmike wrote:If we trade for Melo is the assumption that he's signing the 3 year $65mm extension that Denver has on the table for him?

2012 Amare makes $20mm. Melo would be more than $20mm. Mosgov (if not traded) makes $2.7mm

So we have $45mm sucked up there.

Am I missing something? Where is the max cap space to sign Chris Paul, Dwight Howard or Deron Williams

I just asked the same question in another thread...And why are we so in a hurry to get rid of Felton??

Nalod
Posts: 71178
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
2/15/2011  10:02 AM
Superfriends took a pay cut to be in that boy band.

I don't see happening here. Amare is max and Melo seems to want nothing to do with a pay cut,

I see This year as the Celts last stand and Miami is very thin.

East can be had next year but I think the way to beat miami is to do it with depth. Run them down.

Felton gives you a lot of what Paul does but he needs a backup.

My fear is if we bring in Paul (if even possible) and play him big minutes in SSOL ball he too will wear out.

SSOL requires depth.

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

2/15/2011  10:05 AM
Nalod wrote:Superfriends took a pay cut to be in that boy band.

I don't see happening here. Amare is max and Melo seems to want nothing to do with a pay cut,

I see This year as the Celts last stand and Miami is very thin.

East can be had next year but I think the way to beat miami is to do it with depth. Run them down.

Felton gives you a lot of what Paul does but he needs a backup.

My fear is if we bring in Paul (if even possible) and play him big minutes in SSOL ball he too will wear out.

SSOL requires depth.

Totally agree..

BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
2/15/2011  10:18 AM
MDA only plays 6 guys anyway.
#Knickstaps
WOODMANnYk
Posts: 22417
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2002
Member: #529
USA
2/15/2011  10:19 AM
Guys,

All of u are stressing for no reason.. He's going to the Nets come trading deadline..

The Future. GO KNICKS!
joec32033
Posts: 30612
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/15/2011  10:19 AM
I gotta be honest. I would rather have a team with a little more depth 1-5 then Miami with the Grand Canyon sized drop off between Bosh and their 4th starter.
~You can't run from who you are.~
Nalod
Posts: 71178
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
2/15/2011  10:40 AM
BigSm00th wrote:MDA only plays 6 guys anyway.

BUt look at what depth gives you.

Mozzy was able to grow on the bench, Williams promoted himself. AR was a big piece coming in and depth allowed us to not have to play him.

fishmike
Posts: 53837
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/15/2011  10:59 AM
BigSm00th wrote:MDA only plays 6 guys anyway.

cmon man... he plays 8 guys

To me its all about keeping Gallo, Mosgov and Felton. I'm open to trading the rest.

This is my line up to compete w/ the elite:
PG Felton
SG Melo
SF Gallo
PF Amare
C Mosgov
bench: Douglas, Turiaf, Williams

If we could draft another great shooter like Freddete look out, but with some more experience from Gallo/Mos I think the above is an elite lineup. Size, skill and depth. Sure Lebron and Wade are better than any of our two they will have Joel Anthony or Mario Chalmer or Jones guarding Felton, Gallo and Mosgov. THATS where we hammer them (and every other team).

When Lebron had a gargage shooting game (it happens) the Heat didnt have the ponies to overcome that. The Knicks will

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
grillco
Posts: 20515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/23/2010
Member: #3202

2/15/2011  12:09 PM
fishmike wrote:This is my line up to compete w/ the elite:
PG Felton
SG Melo
SF Gallo
PF Amare
C Mosgov
bench: Douglas, Turiaf, Williams

That's an interesting starting lineup and reserves list. Losing Chandler and Fields kind of hurts though...

fishmike
Posts: 53837
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/15/2011  12:16 PM
grillco wrote:
fishmike wrote:This is my line up to compete w/ the elite:
PG Felton
SG Melo
SF Gallo
PF Amare
C Mosgov
bench: Douglas, Turiaf, Williams

That's an interesting starting lineup and reserves list. Losing Chandler and Fields kind of hurts though...


sure it hurts... but you get Melo back. Dude's an elite scorer. Lets see him play next to another star.

Chandler and Fields are so much easier to replace than Gallo and Mosgov. People have no idea how lucky we got to have Mosgov. Dudes getting better all the time and having a positive impact on games. Thabeet is one year younger and was the 2nd pick in the draft and the dude is terrible. We got Mosgov for cash. Wow.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
grillco
Posts: 20515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/23/2010
Member: #3202

2/15/2011  12:22 PM
fishmike wrote:
grillco wrote:
fishmike wrote:This is my line up to compete w/ the elite:
PG Felton
SG Melo
SF Gallo
PF Amare
C Mosgov
bench: Douglas, Turiaf, Williams

That's an interesting starting lineup and reserves list. Losing Chandler and Fields kind of hurts though...


sure it hurts... but you get Melo back. Dude's an elite scorer. Lets see him play next to another star.

Chandler and Fields are so much easier to replace than Gallo and Mosgov. People have no idea how lucky we got to have Mosgov. Dudes getting better all the time and having a positive impact on games. Thabeet is one year younger and was the 2nd pick in the draft and the dude is terrible. We got Mosgov for cash. Wow.

Damn you and your sound logic!!!

Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
2/15/2011  1:26 PM
Yeah, people need to be banged over the head with something before they see it. When Mozgov figures out teh US game he is going to be a very good center. YOu can already see it.
I just hope that people will like me
fishmike
Posts: 53837
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/15/2011  1:37 PM
Bippity10 wrote:Yeah, people need to be banged over the head with something before they see it. When Mozgov figures out teh US game he is going to be a very good center. YOu can already see it.
he's got a rare combo of physical tools, already present skills, work ethic, desire and passion for the game. If Eddie Curry had Mosgov's focus and work ethic he would be Shaq. This stuff matters and counts.

At this point it looks like Mosgov is a nice fill the stat sheet type center with nice skills and great size. A 12ppg, 10 rebound, 2 blocks, shoot 55% in 28-32 minutes type of guy, and thats the down side. The upside? Well I would say its pretty good... leave it at that

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
martin
Posts: 76255
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/15/2011  1:49 PM
fishmike wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:Yeah, people need to be banged over the head with something before they see it. When Mozgov figures out teh US game he is going to be a very good center. YOu can already see it.
he's got a rare combo of physical tools, already present skills, work ethic, desire and passion for the game. If Eddie Curry had Mosgov's focus and work ethic he would be Shaq. This stuff matters and counts.

At this point it looks like Mosgov is a nice fill the stat sheet type center with nice skills and great size. A 12ppg, 10 rebound, 2 blocks, shoot 55% in 28-32 minutes type of guy, and thats the down side. The upside? Well I would say its pretty good... leave it at that

So the question for me for you and Bip and everyone is this: is he good enough of a defensive C to cover the mistakes and weaknesses of Amare, Melo to get the Knicks past second round?

I think his downside is 10/8/1.5 and he should pan out towards 14/10/2 at 35 minutes. I am most impressed with his motor, willingness to get better and 15" jumpshot.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
2/15/2011  1:52 PM
fishmike wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:Yeah, people need to be banged over the head with something before they see it. When Mozgov figures out teh US game he is going to be a very good center. YOu can already see it.
he's got a rare combo of physical tools, already present skills, work ethic, desire and passion for the game. If Eddie Curry had Mosgov's focus and work ethic he would be Shaq. This stuff matters and counts.

At this point it looks like Mosgov is a nice fill the stat sheet type center with nice skills and great size. A 12ppg, 10 rebound, 2 blocks, shoot 55% in 28-32 minutes type of guy, and thats the down side. The upside? Well I would say its pretty good... leave it at that

Can't say i didn't look at curry with same forcast for his future 4 years ago.

When it comes to big men, they usually start out dominating and become unguardable, mosgov is in the same boat as Spencer hawes and kristic, he's no more then a good back up

ES
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
2/15/2011  1:54 PM
martin wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:Yeah, people need to be banged over the head with something before they see it. When Mozgov figures out teh US game he is going to be a very good center. YOu can already see it.
he's got a rare combo of physical tools, already present skills, work ethic, desire and passion for the game. If Eddie Curry had Mosgov's focus and work ethic he would be Shaq. This stuff matters and counts.

At this point it looks like Mosgov is a nice fill the stat sheet type center with nice skills and great size. A 12ppg, 10 rebound, 2 blocks, shoot 55% in 28-32 minutes type of guy, and thats the down side. The upside? Well I would say its pretty good... leave it at that

So the question for me for you and Bip and everyone is this: is he good enough of a defensive C to cover the mistakes and weaknesses of Amare, Melo to get the Knicks past second round?

I think his downside is 10/8/1.5 and he should pan out towards 14/10/2 at 35 minutes. I am most impressed with his motor, willingness to get better and 15" jumpshot.

I agree mart, it's not like we have a sobonis on our hands

ES
fishmike
Posts: 53837
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/15/2011  1:57 PM
martin wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:Yeah, people need to be banged over the head with something before they see it. When Mozgov figures out teh US game he is going to be a very good center. YOu can already see it.
he's got a rare combo of physical tools, already present skills, work ethic, desire and passion for the game. If Eddie Curry had Mosgov's focus and work ethic he would be Shaq. This stuff matters and counts.

At this point it looks like Mosgov is a nice fill the stat sheet type center with nice skills and great size. A 12ppg, 10 rebound, 2 blocks, shoot 55% in 28-32 minutes type of guy, and thats the down side. The upside? Well I would say its pretty good... leave it at that

So the question for me for you and Bip and everyone is this: is he good enough of a defensive C to cover the mistakes and weaknesses of Amare, Melo to get the Knicks past second round?

I think his downside is 10/8/1.5 and he should pan out towards 14/10/2 at 35 minutes. I am most impressed with his motor, willingness to get better and 15" jumpshot.

I dont know but he's certainly the best candidate. Who's better thats even a remote possibility? Dalembert? Thabeet? Your talking a VERY hard role to fill. Defensive athletic skilled 7 footer. Look around the league.

Mos has confidence issues and gets down on himself, but your right, he's got a great motor, skills and work ethic.

If you think about it the future hinges on Mos as much as any player we have for those reasons. Its possible he can fail, but when he did already what happened? He worked harder and came back better. If thats not the sign of a guy who can make it in this league what is?

He's no softy... tell you that.

I really think the key to competing for a title is get Melo while keeping Mos and Gallo. Thats the mix of size and skill the GREAT teams have.

Yes... Mos has shown me enough to make that investment in terms of patience and keeping the position open enough for him to keep those minutes.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
fishmike
Posts: 53837
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/15/2011  2:27 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:Yeah, people need to be banged over the head with something before they see it. When Mozgov figures out teh US game he is going to be a very good center. YOu can already see it.
he's got a rare combo of physical tools, already present skills, work ethic, desire and passion for the game. If Eddie Curry had Mosgov's focus and work ethic he would be Shaq. This stuff matters and counts.

At this point it looks like Mosgov is a nice fill the stat sheet type center with nice skills and great size. A 12ppg, 10 rebound, 2 blocks, shoot 55% in 28-32 minutes type of guy, and thats the down side. The upside? Well I would say its pretty good... leave it at that

Can't say i didn't look at curry with same forcast for his future 4 years ago.

When it comes to big men, they usually start out dominating and become unguardable, mosgov is in the same boat as Spencer hawes and kristic, he's no more then a good back up

Ben Wallace, Brad Miller, David West, Jermaine Oneil, Andrew Bogut, Theo Ratliff, Kurt Thomas, Okur... dude I could do this all day. There are TONS of bigmen who struggled early on in the NBA to become bigtime NBA players, or at least hig caliber starters on winning teams
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
2/15/2011  3:20 PM
still can't see how the knicks can form a "big 3" if they are forced to trade for melo. if they can sign him outright and retain assets, then yes -- it's possible because while we won't have cap space, we'll have assets. if they have to trade assets to acquire him and sign him to a max extension, then we'll be left with no cap space and a no assets (or not enough assets for the third piece).
check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
question about Melo and Knicks prospects of a "big 3"

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy