[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Looks like the Minnesota randolph story is still on
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/2/2011  8:24 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/2/2011  8:24 AM
Like I said--if we got Telfair and a number pick--Im good. You get three assets a back up PG a first round pick and you take away cap space. Honestly I dont see much more than that and if MDA is unhappy Randolph is unhappy--I don't think you hijack a 21 year old kid and make him stay in a situation where nothing will come out of it. I think the offer is more than reasonable. We need the pick and we need the cap space--we dont and will not use Randolph--we could use a guy ho can spell Felton and move TD to back up 2 which is what he is. Its a solid move for all parties. Im not giving up Ridnour if Im Minesota.
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
cheers
Posts: 21060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/27/2010
Member: #3316

1/2/2011  8:33 AM
BRIGGS wrote:Like I said--if we got Telfair and a number pick--Im good. You get three assets a back up PG a first round pick and you take away cap space. Honestly I dont see much more than that and if MDA is unhappy Randolph is unhappy--I don't think you hijack a 21 year old kid and make him stay in a situation where nothing will come out of it. I think the offer is more than reasonable. We need the pick and we need the cap space--we dont and will not use Randolph--we could use a guy ho can spell Felton and move TD to back up 2 which is what he is. Its a solid move for all parties. Im not giving up Ridnour if Im Minesota.

wow if ny rly gets a first round pick, that could help with the package for melo.

i would be an ar fan for life if that happened. heheh.

Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
1/2/2011  10:14 AM
You are dealing with Khan who will never offer a first round pick. He knows he is headed lottery. No way he gives up a lottery pick unless they are holding someone else's pick.
MSG3
Posts: 22788
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/2/2009
Member: #2476
USA
1/2/2011  10:51 AM
Vmart wrote:You are dealing with Khan who will never offer a first round pick. He knows he is headed lottery. No way he gives up a lottery pick unless they are holding someone else's pick.

I think they hold Utah's 1st round pick.

smackeddog
Posts: 38390
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
1/2/2011  11:05 AM
MSG3 wrote:
Vmart wrote:You are dealing with Khan who will never offer a first round pick. He knows he is headed lottery. No way he gives up a lottery pick unless they are holding someone else's pick.

I think they hold Utah's 1st round pick.

Wolves have Utah's 2011 (top 16 protected this year and Memphis's 2011 (top 14 protected this year). Their own 2011 belongs to Utah, but is top 10 protected this year so they'll keep it to- but next years the killer with it having no protection at all (did no one learn from Isiah's mistakes!).

I think maybe the Knicks could squeeze the Wolves for Ridnour and one of their 1st's for AR, if Johnny Flynn starts playing well and becomes a starter again- If they truly believe that Rubio is coming, and if Flynn is a keeper (though they're rumoured to be looking to trade him) then they may be able lose Ridnour and his salary. Only way we take him is if we've finally sorted out the Melo situation/ traded for players that wipe out our cap space in the offseason.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/2/2011  11:37 AM
sorry but unless we're getting back a fully unprotected pick, i'm passing on trading AR in any package for Telfair... Telfair has zero upside... he's a role player at best... a late 1st round pick can be purchased every year for cash... AR is 1 of our more valuable assets right now (or used to be anyway)... we need to build his value back up before trading him... buy low, sell high, isn't that the usual strategy for stock traders?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38412
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
1/2/2011  11:55 AM
TMS wrote:sorry but unless we're getting back a fully unprotected pick, i'm passing on trading AR in any package for Telfair... Telfair has zero upside... he's a role player at best... a late 1st round pick can be purchased every year for cash... AR is 1 of our more valuable assets right now (or used to be anyway)... we need to build his value back up before trading him... buy low, sell high, isn't that the usual strategy for stock traders?

I agree. I just don't see anything with Telfair. The whole Dinglebury association is also gut wrenching. Pass please.

Knixkik
Posts: 35452
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
1/2/2011  12:20 PM
This is a great deal. We don't need ridnour or another PG who is going to be mad playing only 12 mins a game behind Felton. Telfair can run an offense for that amount of time and that's what we need. The draft pick is the most important part. If we are getting a draft pick and a rotation player then we are making out very well.
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
1/2/2011  12:28 PM
No way would I do the proposed trade. Regardless of AR's playing time, he is worth more than Telfair and a late first round pick, which is basically saying $3 million.

If we need AR off the team for cap space reasons you don't do a trade with Minnesota on just principle. Find another team.

The thing that is really crazy is that D'Antoni is hurting himself here. If he played Randolph then at least his value could go up and D'Antoni could get a player he values in a trade. D'Antoni as far as flexibility goes is like a young Larry Brown.

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/2/2011  1:04 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/2/2011  1:05 PM
earthmansurfer wrote:No way would I do the proposed trade. Regardless of AR's playing time, he is worth more than Telfair and a late first round pick, which is basically saying $3 million.

If we need AR off the team for cap space reasons you don't do a trade with Minnesota on just principle. Find another team.

The thing that is really crazy is that D'Antoni is hurting himself here. If he played Randolph then at least his value could go up and D'Antoni could get a player he values in a trade. D'Antoni as far as flexibility goes is like a young Larry Brown.


WHAT? How could AR's value go up if he kept playing and doing poorly? You mean you HOPE that if he kept playing that he'd do something eventually that would raise his value. FOr that to happen he would have to have done a WHOLE LOT better and if he did then we wouldn't be talking about trading him!!!! You hide prospects like him if you think he's not gonna shine. MDA actually protected him by keeping the mystery there of his potential, rather than play him knowing he was lost right now and unable to show what he can do in this offense. It's not a good fit for him and he would keep missing and taking bad shots. Better to not expose him like that.

Oh yeah and i'm against trading him. I want to keep working with him and see if we can get him going. Trades won't bring back good enough value.

umynot
Posts: 21465
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/4/2008
Member: #2093
USA
1/2/2011  2:22 PM
TMS wrote:sorry but unless we're getting back a fully unprotected pick, i'm passing on trading AR in any package for Telfair... Telfair has zero upside... he's a role player at best... a late 1st round pick can be purchased every year for cash... AR is 1 of our more valuable assets right now (or used to be anyway)... we need to build his value back up before trading him... buy low, sell high, isn't that the usual strategy for stock traders?

I agree with TMS.....

AR even not playing has more value then Telfair and a late pick

But I would do AR for Rubio and a pick!!

KNICKS on the way UP!!!
GustavBahler
Posts: 42824
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

1/2/2011  2:25 PM
nixluva wrote:
Oh yeah and i'm against trading him. I want to keep working with him and see if we can get him going. Trades won't bring back good enough value.

I agree but at some point you have to let him play and see if he can get it going. AR can't do that from the bench. A few minutes here and there will not hurt his value but it could help him regain his confidence. I'm not even talking about making him a part of the rotation at this point.

Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

1/2/2011  2:34 PM
GustavBahler wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Oh yeah and i'm against trading him. I want to keep working with him and see if we can get him going. Trades won't bring back good enough value.

I agree but at some point you have to let him play and see if he can get it going. AR can't do that from the bench. A few minutes here and there will not hurt his value but it could help him regain his confidence. I'm not even talking about making him a part of the rotation at this point.


Would he be better off playing some games in the DL? How would Randolph take this kind of demotion if Walsh did it?
No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
93BUICK
Posts: 22281
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/6/2006
Member: #1175
USA
1/2/2011  3:47 PM
This is a know when to hold'em situation. Don't trade AR!
If you are still following the team and reading sites like this, there is nothing, short of your own demise, that is going to throw you off this train.
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
1/2/2011  4:29 PM
nixluva wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:No way would I do the proposed trade. Regardless of AR's playing time, he is worth more than Telfair and a late first round pick, which is basically saying $3 million.

If we need AR off the team for cap space reasons you don't do a trade with Minnesota on just principle. Find another team.

The thing that is really crazy is that D'Antoni is hurting himself here. If he played Randolph then at least his value could go up and D'Antoni could get a player he values in a trade. D'Antoni as far as flexibility goes is like a young Larry Brown.


WHAT? How could AR's value go up if he kept playing and doing poorly? You mean you HOPE that if he kept playing that he'd do something eventually that would raise his value. FOr that to happen he would have to have done a WHOLE LOT better and if he did then we wouldn't be talking about trading him!!!! You hide prospects like him if you think he's not gonna shine. MDA actually protected him by keeping the mystery there of his potential, rather than play him knowing he was lost right now and unable to show what he can do in this offense. It's not a good fit for him and he would keep missing and taking bad shots. Better to not expose him like that.

Oh yeah and i'm against trading him. I want to keep working with him and see if we can get him going. Trades won't bring back good enough value.

My point is that his value can't get any lower than where it is. I mean a late first round pick is not worth but 3 million. I don't want to trade him either but I have a feeling he is not the right player for coach. I don't disagree with what you are saying, it's rather the coach being a big part of the problem imo. You can find a few minutes here and there for a lotto pick that so many say has all star potential. This is why I made the Larry Brown remark. Coach is trying to mode AR into something that I'm afraid he can't become.

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
GustavBahler
Posts: 42824
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

1/2/2011  4:36 PM
Paladin55 wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Oh yeah and i'm against trading him. I want to keep working with him and see if we can get him going. Trades won't bring back good enough value.

I agree but at some point you have to let him play and see if he can get it going. AR can't do that from the bench. A few minutes here and there will not hurt his value but it could help him regain his confidence. I'm not even talking about making him a part of the rotation at this point.


Would he be better off playing some games in the DL? How would Randolph take this kind of demotion if Walsh did it?

That's a good question. I honestly don't know Paladin55.

babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
1/2/2011  4:39 PM
GustavBahler wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Oh yeah and i'm against trading him. I want to keep working with him and see if we can get him going. Trades won't bring back good enough value.

I agree but at some point you have to let him play and see if he can get it going. AR can't do that from the bench. A few minutes here and there will not hurt his value but it could help him regain his confidence. I'm not even talking about making him a part of the rotation at this point.

Have you been watching the games...when AR plays, we lose...I'd rather have the wins then care about some kids confidence.

No to trade unless the PG is Rubio.

Let's go Knicks. That's amare
GustavBahler
Posts: 42824
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

1/2/2011  4:46 PM
babyKnicks wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Oh yeah and i'm against trading him. I want to keep working with him and see if we can get him going. Trades won't bring back good enough value.

I agree but at some point you have to let him play and see if he can get it going. AR can't do that from the bench. A few minutes here and there will not hurt his value but it could help him regain his confidence. I'm not even talking about making him a part of the rotation at this point.

Have you been watching the games...when AR plays, we lose...I'd rather have the wins then care about some kids confidence.

No to trade unless the PG is Rubio.

Yes I have been watching the games. I watched how they started winning when Gallo, Felton, and Chandler stopped chucking shots non-stop from behind the arc and started driving to the rim more. I watched as Felton and Stat got the P&R down and Felton became more of a floor general. I watched as their ball movement improved. AR was having problems but he wasn't winning or losing any games. Maybe you should start watching the games more closely.

babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
1/2/2011  4:49 PM
GustavBahler wrote:
babyKnicks wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Oh yeah and i'm against trading him. I want to keep working with him and see if we can get him going. Trades won't bring back good enough value.

I agree but at some point you have to let him play and see if he can get it going. AR can't do that from the bench. A few minutes here and there will not hurt his value but it could help him regain his confidence. I'm not even talking about making him a part of the rotation at this point.

Have you been watching the games...when AR plays, we lose...I'd rather have the wins then care about some kids confidence.

No to trade unless the PG is Rubio.

Yes I have been watching the games. I watched how they started winning when Gallo, Felton, and Chandler stopped chucking shots non-stop from behind the arc and started driving to the rim more. I watched as Felton and Stat got the P&R down and Felton became more of a floor general. I watched as their ball movement improved. AR was having problems but he wasn't winning or losing any games. Maybe you should start watching the games more closely.

I see AR shooting as soon as he gets it and not defending or rebounding.

What's the infatuation with playing someone that isn't ready? This is his SECOND dog house...nelly plays everybody and the kid didn't get it.

I'd rather focus on timofey.

Why the love affair with playing AR.

Let's go Knicks. That's amare
MSG3
Posts: 22788
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/2/2009
Member: #2476
USA
1/2/2011  4:49 PM
GustavBahler wrote:
babyKnicks wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Oh yeah and i'm against trading him. I want to keep working with him and see if we can get him going. Trades won't bring back good enough value.

I agree but at some point you have to let him play and see if he can get it going. AR can't do that from the bench. A few minutes here and there will not hurt his value but it could help him regain his confidence. I'm not even talking about making him a part of the rotation at this point.

Have you been watching the games...when AR plays, we lose...I'd rather have the wins then care about some kids confidence.

No to trade unless the PG is Rubio.

Yes I have been watching the games. I watched how they started winning when Gallo, Felton, and Chandler stopped chucking shots non-stop from behind the arc and started driving to the rim more. I watched as Felton and Stat got the P&R down and Felton became more of a floor general. I watched as their ball movement improved. AR was having problems but he wasn't winning or losing any games. Maybe you should start watching the games more closely.

Disagree. AR was really costing the team in the minutes he got during the 3-8 start. He was terrible. Turnovers, dumb shots, looked like hr was about to cry, etc. Right around the time they stopped playing him and Moz we started winning.

Looks like the Minnesota randolph story is still on

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy