[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

according to espn--knicks have the ability to acquire 2011 #1
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
9/30/2010  2:33 PM
if denver will do a deal with the knicks.
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/30/2010  2:40 PM
BRIGGS wrote:if denver will do a deal with the knicks.

YO where's the info. LINK? Something.
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
9/30/2010  2:42 PM
this is on the melo thread
Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
9/30/2010  2:44 PM
Well, a while ago it was AR to Indiana for their first. But that is not enough for AR.
Wonder if it's Chandler, another player and cash? I doubt we trade either Gallo or AR for a pick, they are worth more.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
Panos
Posts: 30089
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
9/30/2010  2:45 PM
Why do I have a feeling I might vomit when I hear the actual trade?
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
9/30/2010  2:50 PM
Panos wrote:Why do I have a feeling I might vomit when I hear the actual trade?

because you drank a glass of bad milk with breakfast?

check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
Moonangie
Posts: 24766
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 7/9/2009
Member: #2788
9/30/2010  2:51 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/30/2010  3:30 PM
Trade one of our core assets for the 1st round pick we will then send to Denver for yet more of our core assets to get Melo?

Umm, NO EFFING WAY! Donnie Walnuts won't crack that nut open. Wait for the deadline, Donnie, then take a nice long nap until next summer. Sheesh, we are on the cusp of having a damn team. Don't move our core for trade chips...please.
smackeddog
Posts: 38390
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
9/30/2010  2:51 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/30/2010  2:55 PM
earthmansurfer wrote:Well, a while ago it was AR to Indiana for their first. But that is not enough for AR.
Wonder if it's Chandler, another player and cash? I doubt we trade either Gallo or AR for a pick, they are worth more.

The source is on this thread:

http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?t=36541&page=11

I don't see why Chandler would have to be packaged with cash or another player- he could get you a pick straight up. I think I read w few weeks ago that the Spurs were interested in him and needed a back up SF, don't know how true that is.
NYK3
Posts: 23572
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/30/2004
Member: #725
USA
9/30/2010  3:01 PM
I would be all for trading Chandler for a 1st rounder then trading that pick, curry and ar for Melo
I wasn't born with enough middle fingers!!!
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
9/30/2010  3:06 PM
NYK3 wrote:I would be all for trading Chandler for a 1st rounder then trading that pick, curry and ar for Melo

Id be willing to take back salary give picks and Chandler--thats it.

RIP Crushalot😞
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
9/30/2010  3:10 PM
What core assets....if u think this roster will get us out of the east and into the finals your dreaming..
ES
smackeddog
Posts: 38390
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
9/30/2010  3:23 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
NYK3 wrote:I would be all for trading Chandler for a 1st rounder then trading that pick, curry and ar for Melo

Id be willing to take back salary give picks and Chandler--thats it.

I don't want to lose Gallo or AR, and it would be a bit cruel trading Gallo after the team have just been to Milan- it would send a bad message to the rest of the players too. However, I'm curious- if the Knicks were definitely trading one or the other, who would you rather keep? Keeping AR makes sense because he can rebound, block shots and play 3 to 5. However Gallo is a bit more proven and his 3 point shooting allows us to get away with SF playing the SG spot, and opens things up a bit for the rest of the players inside. I'll be sad to see either go. I still think Denver won't trade him to us out of spite regardless of what we offer, so I think they're safe.
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
9/30/2010  3:23 PM
knicks1248 wrote:What core assets....if u think this roster will get us out of the east and into the finals your dreaming..

Don't all of us kinda of only have a vague idea as to where this roster can get us? Everyone other than Amare is so young we have no idea where the potential ceiling of some of these guys are...

I can understand that you have your doubts but don't see how you're so certain about things.

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
NYK3
Posts: 23572
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/30/2004
Member: #725
USA
9/30/2010  3:25 PM
What I dont understand is why some people on here treat AR like he is MJ??????
I wasn't born with enough middle fingers!!!
ATrain
Posts: 21487
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2010
Member: #3192
9/30/2010  3:27 PM
NYK3 wrote:What I dont understand is why some people on here treat AR like he is MJ??????

I agree but I also disagree. The only reason I want to keep AR is because I think he can really reach his potential if he takes after Amar'e's work ethic. I think this is the best way to let AR develop, with one of the best PF's in the league.
Knixkik
Posts: 35464
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
9/30/2010  3:42 PM
smackeddog wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
NYK3 wrote:I would be all for trading Chandler for a 1st rounder then trading that pick, curry and ar for Melo

Id be willing to take back salary give picks and Chandler--thats it.

I don't want to lose Gallo or AR, and it would be a bit cruel trading Gallo after the team have just been to Milan- it would send a bad message to the rest of the players too. However, I'm curious- if the Knicks were definitely trading one or the other, who would you rather keep? Keeping AR makes sense because he can rebound, block shots and play 3 to 5. However Gallo is a bit more proven and his 3 point shooting allows us to get away with SF playing the SG spot, and opens things up a bit for the rest of the players inside. I'll be sad to see either go. I still think Denver won't trade him to us out of spite regardless of what we offer, so I think they're safe.

If we had the choice I would rather keep gallo just because he is our home grown talent and more proven. He can also slide to the 2 because of his shooting ability. I'm not sure which one Denver likes more but if they want gallo I'm find keeping AR. He has more upside and can gopefuly start at the 5 in the future we will just need to find a shooting guard who can stretch the floor in the worst way.
itchetrigr
Posts: 20111
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/17/2007
Member: #1748
Norway
9/30/2010  4:00 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Id be willing to take back salary give picks and Chandler--thats it.

Im with Briggs on this one, IMO DW best move is to stand pat and only offer what he necessarily has to. we still have a shot of landing Melo if he doesnt sign the extention...
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
9/30/2010  4:22 PM
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:What core assets....if u think this roster will get us out of the east and into the finals your dreaming..

Don't all of us kinda of only have a vague idea as to where this roster can get us? Everyone other than Amare is so young we have no idea where the potential ceiling of some of these guys are...

I can understand that you have your doubts but don't see how you're so certain about things.

We got maybe 5 guys you could say are Above-Average.

Amare, Felton (maybe), Gallo, and we're hoping WC and AR make it.

Everyone else is a chump.

lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
9/30/2010  4:44 PM
alanhahn tweet: From what I understand, there is no actual trade for a first. There are scenarios in which the Knicks know they can get one if they need to.

15 minutes ago via TweetDeck

lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
fishmike
Posts: 53851
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
9/30/2010  4:53 PM
Walsh can just sit and let Denver squirm. If they want to take a couple rotation guys and 2nd rounders now we will bite. Otherwise we offer him the max this summer. Those are the 2 options I am working with. I will eat salary and give up any package of Chandler, Azu, Turiaf, Fields, Rautins, Walker + cash. Otherwise I wait happy this this summer.

Core assets = young multi skilled 7 foot fowards. No Gallo No AR. No Douglas (they have 2 pgs anyway) No Mosgov. Cheers

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
according to espn--knicks have the ability to acquire 2011 #1
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy