[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Nets offering #2 pick Favors Devin Harris and 2 first round picks for melo--no to Lopez
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/31/2010  12:49 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/31/2010  12:56 PM
Now tell me what the Knicks would have to offer???? So the Nets are offering a young talented well-proven PG--the #2 player picked in this years draft and two or more 1's than will not be from 2014 as the Nets ahev 9 in the next 2 years.

Its going to cost Gallo Randolph Chandler--that's the cost--atleast

# Jon Rothstein JonRothstein

New Jersey's package will consist of Derrick Favors, Devin Harris, and a slew of draft picks...#Nets have 9 first round picks in next 2 yrs 6 minutes ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®

RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
8/31/2010  12:57 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Now tell me what the Knicks would have to offer???? So the Nets are offering a young talented well-proven PG--the #2 player picked in this years draft and two more 1's than will not be from 2014.

Its going to cost Gallo Randolph Chandler--that's the cost.

notice the nets didn't and from what I hear, don't want to offer lopez? why is that? do they think lopez is better than melo? again, smart teams are not going to gut their talent in this type of deal.. yea, they can deal picks and even deal favors, but they want lopez to play with melo... and that makes sense...

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
ATrain
Posts: 21487
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2010
Member: #3192

8/31/2010  1:01 PM
I think this isn't toooo much better than what we have to offer. But maybe I'm biased, because I really don't see too much potential in Favors.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38414
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
8/31/2010  1:06 PM
They must think that Melo will sign an extension with them.
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
8/31/2010  1:14 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Now tell me what the Knicks would have to offer???? So the Nets are offering a young talented well-proven PG--the #2 player picked in this years draft and two more 1's than will not be from 2014.

Its going to cost Gallo Randolph Chandler--that's the cost.

Denver was never going to give Carmelo away and other teams weren't going to stand by while we got Carmelo for Gallo and pocket lint.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
smackeddog
Posts: 38390
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
8/31/2010  1:15 PM
For whatever reason Denver either doesn't value our players, or is bluffing. So we either call their bluff and walk away or we accept that they don't want our players and walk away and wait and see if circumstances change in our favour.

What annoys me is how while our young players are disrespected by every writer and other GM, every other teams players are praised- do they honestly believe we have the worst young players in the league? Really?

Why do all the writers sing Devin Harris's praises all the time? He's not a real all star- he had ONE good year and made it, but I don't think he'll ever be an allstar again. He's good but not great, more on Felton's level. He's not that young anymore either- he'll turn 28 in Feb.

Also the Nets aren't actually as awash with picks as writers are making out in their frequent praising of the Nets. They have their own firsts, BUT the Golden state pick is heavily protected to the point where it will probably turn into 2 second round picks. Also they, like every other team can't trade their own pick 2 years back to back. That means they could trade one of their own picks and the golden state pick that will probably become 2 second rounders. The rest of their extra picks are 2nd rounders. Whoopie! But it doesn't stop all the writers promoting that they have 8 picks over the next 2 drafts- technically true, but they're nearly all second rounders. It's just another example of them trying to promote the Nets in the best light possible at all times.

Derrick Favors sisn't look good in summer league, he might pan out or he might be a bust- love that the press are making out he has more value by far than Anthony Randolph.

My anti-net frustrations aside, Denver is set at PG- they have Billups, then they have Lawson waiting to take over- why would another point guard remotely interest them? It wouldn't. So the only parts of the trade that would interest them would be Favors, a 1st rounder and golden states pick that will probably end up being a second round pick in several years time. I don't see how thats objectively better than AR, Gallo, Chandler and our 2014 1st rounder (that would be stupidly overpaying by far). I wouldn't even offer all that, but I just find the reporting on this subject and the downplaying of our talent and it's value, ridiculous

AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
8/31/2010  1:17 PM
tkf wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Now tell me what the Knicks would have to offer???? So the Nets are offering a young talented well-proven PG--the #2 player picked in this years draft and two more 1's than will not be from 2014.

Its going to cost Gallo Randolph Chandler--that's the cost.

notice the nets didn't and from what I hear, don't want to offer lopez? why is that? do they think lopez is better than melo? again, smart teams are not going to gut their talent in this type of deal.. yea, they can deal picks and even deal favors, but they want lopez to play with melo... and that makes sense...

The Nets dont want to trade Lopez because he has proven he is a quality NBA center. Easier to find an athletic PF than it is too get a quality center with offense.

Al Horford could be a RFA this summer and the Nets will have cap space even if they acquire Carmelo.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/31/2010  1:34 PM
This was my argument--the COST!! The nets can give away 3 #1 picks like it was yesterdays news because they have 9 of them--so the cost to them is not as overwhelming as it would be to us--since we have no picks--it would cost us current assets--and once give up all that it would take--our team is Fd. For those who thought it was going top cost Chandler Gallo 2014--think again---throw in randolph Fields and GS picks + our 2014--that is a similar deal to 3 #1's favors and harris./
RIP Crushalot😞
nyvector16
Posts: 21323
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/9/2001
Member: #130
USA
8/31/2010  1:35 PM
Why would anyone give the Nuggets any substantial talent in any trade scenario for a 1 year Carmelo rental.
If he does not agree to sign an extension with anyone but the Knicks... They are screwed and must take what we offer. or lose him for nothing.
Nobody is going to trade for him without an extension in place. Period.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/31/2010  1:39 PM
nyvector16 wrote:Why would anyone give the Nuggets any substantial talent in any trade scenario for a 1 year Carmelo rental.
If he does not agree to sign an extension with anyone but the Knicks... They are screwed and must take what we offer. or lose him for nothing.
Nobody is going to trade for him without an extension in place. Period.

If they know they will resign--why not? Don't you think assurances will be made? These are not idiots:)

RIP Crushalot😞
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39923
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

8/31/2010  1:43 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
tkf wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Now tell me what the Knicks would have to offer???? So the Nets are offering a young talented well-proven PG--the #2 player picked in this years draft and two more 1's than will not be from 2014.

Its going to cost Gallo Randolph Chandler--that's the cost.

notice the nets didn't and from what I hear, don't want to offer lopez? why is that? do they think lopez is better than melo? again, smart teams are not going to gut their talent in this type of deal.. yea, they can deal picks and even deal favors, but they want lopez to play with melo... and that makes sense...

The Nets dont want to trade Lopez because he has proven he is a quality NBA center. Easier to find an athletic PF than it is too get a quality center with offense.

Al Horford could be a RFA this summer and the Nets will have cap space even if they acquire Carmelo.

Denver already has Ty Lawson who is younger and cheaper than Harris. I don't see them hopping on that deal unless it's their last option.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
martin
Posts: 76310
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
8/31/2010  1:43 PM
nyvector16 wrote:Why would anyone give the Nuggets any substantial talent in any trade scenario for a 1 year Carmelo rental.
If he does not agree to sign an extension with anyone but the Knicks... They are screwed and must take what we offer. or lose him for nothing.
Nobody is going to trade for him without an extension in place. Period.

i think an extension is an assumption with a Denver Melo trade.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
8/31/2010  1:45 PM
BRIGGS wrote:This was my argument--the COST!! The nets can give away 3 #1 picks like it was yesterdays news because they have 9 of them--so the cost to them is not as overwhelming as it would be to us--since we have no picks--it would cost us current assets--and once give up all that it would take--our team is Fd. For those who thought it was going top cost Chandler Gallo 2014--think again---throw in randolph Fields and GS picks + our 2014--that is a similar deal to 3 #1's favors and harris./


We have Amare eating up massive cap. So in order to capitalize on Amare's few remaining good years we need to bring him help NOW. Carmelo + Amare makes us a very good team in the East.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
firefly
Posts: 23226
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
8/31/2010  1:47 PM
martin wrote:
nyvector16 wrote:Why would anyone give the Nuggets any substantial talent in any trade scenario for a 1 year Carmelo rental.
If he does not agree to sign an extension with anyone but the Knicks... They are screwed and must take what we offer. or lose him for nothing.
Nobody is going to trade for him without an extension in place. Period.

i think an extension is an assumption with a Denver Melo trade.

Noones taking anyones word on that Martin. See Boozer, Carlos.

Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
NYKBocker
Posts: 38414
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
8/31/2010  1:50 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:This was my argument--the COST!! The nets can give away 3 #1 picks like it was yesterdays news because they have 9 of them--so the cost to them is not as overwhelming as it would be to us--since we have no picks--it would cost us current assets--and once give up all that it would take--our team is Fd. For those who thought it was going top cost Chandler Gallo 2014--think again---throw in randolph Fields and GS picks + our 2014--that is a similar deal to 3 #1's favors and harris./


We have Amare eating up massive cap. So in order to capitalize on Amare's few remaining good years we need to bring him help NOW. Carmelo + Amare makes us a very good team in the East.

Our team currently constituted is a very good team. Carmelo is a nice piece but gutting the team would be irresponsible.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/31/2010  1:51 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
tkf wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Now tell me what the Knicks would have to offer???? So the Nets are offering a young talented well-proven PG--the #2 player picked in this years draft and two more 1's than will not be from 2014.

Its going to cost Gallo Randolph Chandler--that's the cost.

notice the nets didn't and from what I hear, don't want to offer lopez? why is that? do they think lopez is better than melo? again, smart teams are not going to gut their talent in this type of deal.. yea, they can deal picks and even deal favors, but they want lopez to play with melo... and that makes sense...

The Nets dont want to trade Lopez because he has proven he is a quality NBA center. Easier to find an athletic PF than it is too get a quality center with offense.

Al Horford could be a RFA this summer and the Nets will have cap space even if they acquire Carmelo.

Denver already has Ty Lawson who is younger and cheaper than Harris. I don't see them hopping on that deal unless it's their last option.

heck 3 #1 picks and Flavors alone is a good deal alone--Harris will only have two more years on a reasonable contract where they could flip him again or just keep him. Look what we have Eddy Curry!!! value=0000 make no mistake--give me a better NY deal than 3 # 1 picks in the next two years Falvoirs and Harris---I dont see it--and #2 we would be insane to do it!!

RIP Crushalot😞
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/31/2010  1:56 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Now tell me what the Knicks would have to offer???? So the Nets are offering a young talented well-proven PG--the #2 player picked in this years draft and two or more 1's than will not be from 2014 as the Nets ahev 9 in the next 2 years.

Its going to cost Gallo Randolph Chandler--that's the cost--atleast

# Jon Rothstein JonRothstein

New Jersey's package will consist of Derrick Favors, Devin Harris, and a slew of draft picks...#Nets have 9 first round picks in next 2 yrs 6 minutes ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®


I think the assets NJ has stock piled the past few years has been ignored or poo pooed by many because of their record. However, if NJ comes away with Melo their summer was definitely a huge success. A front line of Melo, Murphy and Lopez would be awesome. I loved the Morrow signing as well. The only thing they would be lacking would be a point guard and they do have some options there.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/31/2010  2:01 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Now tell me what the Knicks would have to offer???? So the Nets are offering a young talented well-proven PG--the #2 player picked in this years draft and two or more 1's than will not be from 2014 as the Nets ahev 9 in the next 2 years.

Its going to cost Gallo Randolph Chandler--that's the cost--atleast

# Jon Rothstein JonRothstein

New Jersey's package will consist of Derrick Favors, Devin Harris, and a slew of draft picks...#Nets have 9 first round picks in next 2 yrs 6 minutes ago via Twitter for BlackBerry®


I think the assets NJ has stock piled the past few years has been ignored or poo pooed by many because of their record. However, if NJ comes away with Melo their summer was definitely a huge success. A front line of Melo, Murphy and Lopez would be awesome. I loved the Morrow signing as well. The only thing they would be lacking would be a point guard and they do have some options there.

Those 3 #1 is impossible to match up with given that they are also including a guy many people think is going ot be very very good in Favors--just picked #2 and a very solid young PG in Harris. How could we trump that offer--and if we tried--we would be fd anyway. We made our play to get rid of Jefferies.

RIP Crushalot😞
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
8/31/2010  2:06 PM
If Melo was willing to sign an extension with the Nets wouldn't his agent contact the Knicks to see if they could put a better offer together?
Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
fishmike
Posts: 53851
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/31/2010  2:09 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:This was my argument--the COST!! The nets can give away 3 #1 picks like it was yesterdays news because they have 9 of them--so the cost to them is not as overwhelming as it would be to us--since we have no picks--it would cost us current assets--and once give up all that it would take--our team is Fd. For those who thought it was going top cost Chandler Gallo 2014--think again---throw in randolph Fields and GS picks + our 2014--that is a similar deal to 3 #1's favors and harris./


We have Amare eating up massive cap. So in order to capitalize on Amare's few remaining good years we need to bring him help NOW. Carmelo + Amare makes us a very good team in the East.

Knicks would be 4th best team in the East at the very best. Then your left with low draft picks and the MLE to improve your team and your stuck at 48-50 wins and getting bounced in round 2 every year. Wow... sign me up.

Gallo and AR are still in their rookie contracts next year. Felton is still cheap at $7mm if he blows up in the MDA system. Douglas is in his rookie deal. Your looking at max cap space next year if you let Chandler walk and build around a core of Felton/Douglas/AR/Gallo/Amare/Fields/Rautins/Mosgov. THATS how you build a title team. That core should be a playoff team next year. You have a chance to keep together your young players with all star potential and add another max/star guy, or use the cap space to trade for one.

All trading for Melo does is marry you to being a middle seeded playoff team for the next 5 years. Sorry, that doesnt excite me

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Nets offering #2 pick Favors Devin Harris and 2 first round picks for melo--no to Lopez

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy