Dunno?

Oh wait, a team with "WHiteside"?

No, but if you got a full contending squad you got no cap room!!! HA HA It was a trick question?

No, Ok, Wait wait.......

I'd say the Bulls!!!!

Yeah, I'd say the bulls!!!!

But, thats not a good thing is it??

OK, Ok, its briggy so its trickey!!!! Right, real trickey!

So the answer is............Nets!!!!

No thats not right either! ITs Bulls, yeah, Im going with BUlls!

You did say HONEST right?

Oh, yeah, the Clippahs!!!!!!!! Thats my real answer. This time. HONESTLY!

I agree. Signing with Mia is instant contention.

Just depends on if he wants his own team/town or to tailgate onto Wade, and always have one less ring than his teammate in his teammate's town.

To answer the question thinking between those two teams -- the Nets won 12 games last year and as of right now they haven't added any difference makers...They added a good young PF in the draft who's arguably as raw a prospect as any player taken in the lottery, a decent-looking SG (though they did loose CDR who was a big 2 that could play and Jordan Crawford doesn't start over C Lee or Williams so I question how much of an impact that pick makes) and then some German big man nobody's ever heard of at 31...They're still an interesting young team with a lot of pieces in place but there's definitely no Amar'e-caliber player there, maybe not even a player on Gallinari's level...Again, NJ Nets = 12 wins last year. They didn't win the lottery so no John Wall which could've made a huge difference..

Meanwhile, the NY Knicks by comparison: 5-time all-star PF in Amar'e Stoudemire who's a young 27 and in his prime (difference-maker, tremendous #2 guy for a guy like LBJ), 6'11" Gallinari & his vast potential (I'm not the hugest Gallo guy but even I gotta admit he's got a great chance of realizing his full potential playing with LBJ every day) then there's useful players in Chandler, TD, surprise contributor Bill Walker who's lost a ton of weight and looks ready to go...Plus 7'1" intriguing C Jerome Jordan, sharpshooter Andy Rautins and Landry Fields who looks more and more like Wilson Chandler/Jared Dudley every time I look at his clips -- this dude looks more than serviceable).. I tell ya what, not terrible man... NJ might have a few more young building blocks in place but NY's right there. One can even argue that NY is much more top-heavy with superior talent (thanks in large part to the Amar'e signing) than Jersey..

Using that logic, together with the earning potential that comes with playing in NYC & the cap room that we could clear next summer to continue adding, I'd choose the Knicks if I were this dude..

Panos wrote:

VDesai wrote:Ill take Lebrare over Dwosh

Word. Never liked Bosh.

I actually like Bosh a lot but he didn't show any committment here so the Knicks did exactly what they needed to do and they went for the 1b big man in Amar'e...No problem at all with what the Knicks did..

BRIGGS wrote:

Nalod wrote:um? Uh?

Dunno?

Oh wait, a team with "WHiteside"?

No, but if you got a full contending squad you got no cap room!!! HA HA It was a trick question?

No, Ok, Wait wait.......

I'd say the Bulls!!!!

Yeah, I'd say the bulls!!!!

But, thats not a good thing is it??

OK, Ok, its briggy so its trickey!!!! Right, real trickey!

So the answer is............Nets!!!!

No thats not right either! ITs Bulls, yeah, Im going with BUlls!

You did say HONEST right?

Oh, yeah, the Clippahs!!!!!!!! Thats my real answer. This time. HONESTLY!

This is stupid and slightly obnoxious

Its very stupid and even more obnoxious!!

But you ask questions somtimes to make a statement instead.

Lighten up, your just pissed I beat you to the MSG by a week!

But your gonna make a lot more than I will! If its Knicks the stock will pop!

TMS wrote:right now if you added Lebron to the Clippers, as funny as that sounds, i think they have the best chance of winning a championship w/the roster they already have in place.

blake griffin has never played an nba game, just had massive knee surgery and baron davis is a shadow of his former self.

lol.

crzymdups wrote:

TMS wrote:right now if you added Lebron to the Clippers, as funny as that sounds, i think they have the best chance of winning a championship w/the roster they already have in place.

blake griffin has never played an nba game, just had massive knee surgery and baron davis is a shadow of his former self.

lol.

It's about potential, not last season. Baron does not have to great!

TMS wrote:

Nalod wrote:

crzymdups wrote:

TMS wrote:right now if you added Lebron to the Clippers, as funny as that sounds, i think they have the best chance of winning a championship w/the roster they already have in place.

blake griffin has never played an nba game, just had massive knee surgery and baron davis is a shadow of his former self.

lol.

It's about potential, not last season. Baron does not have to great!

people talk about the Knicks roster as being the best fit for Lebron... we don't even have a starting C right now & our starting PG is Toney Douglas... Amare is best at PF... our bench is Bill Walker & a couple no name 2nd round picks.

look at the Clippers' roster & tell me that's not a balanced team around Lebron:

C - Kaman 7'
PF - Griffin 6'9"
SF - Lebron 6'8"
SG - Gordon 6'4"
PG - Baron 6'3"
6 - Aminu 6'9"
7 - Jordan 7'
8 - Mardy 6'6"
9 - Warren 6'4"
10 - Bledsoe 6'1"

Yes, dude, but its the Clippers.
THE CLIPPERS.
Anything more need be said?