BRIGGS wrote:and today. Quite frankly they had very little competition---the market the Knicks face is flooded.
I say this because so may teams not only haev cap space but have the secondary ability to S+T. We cannot DISCOUNT teams with NO cap space yet great asset to do S+T with great existing players still on the roster. Because the Knicks have very little to offer in S+T I think it not only mitigates the secondary cap but actually puts us lower than several teams.
chicago also had max space for at least one, if not more than one that year.
the knicks have a lot to offer in terms of market, exposure, coach and a chance to rebuild a great franchise and i think you need to stop your doom and gloom scenarios until something actually happens or doesn't happen.
the difference between this off-season and any other the knicks have had since 1996 is that if a player wants to come here, he can just come here.
i don't think the 6th year is going to be as much of a sticking point as you suggest. if that extra year is so important - why did bron, wade and bosh all take shorter deals so they could explore free agency after three years? all signed with their teams in 2006. they could have signed 7yr extensions. they signed 4-year extensions that kicked in for the 07-08 season with an opt out after three years - all of them are opting out early.
answer me this briggs - if the extra year is so important, why did those guys leave many extra years on the table before? if bron signs a contract here 5yrs with an opt out after 3, he can sign an extension again at age 28.
i don't think the extra year is as important as you think.