[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

If Minnesota gets John Wall...
Author Thread
1
Posts: 20195
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #575
Burkina Faso (Upper Volta)
5/4/2010  1:26 AM
Would you be willing to trade Gallinari, Eddy Curry, 3 mil and a 2nd rounder for Johnny Flynn? That trade gives the Knicks the potential to sign 2 maximum players and David Lee. The lineup then could potentially be:

Flynn
McGrady (resigned for a 1 year 2 mil contract)
Lebron (max contract)
Bosh (max contract)
David Lee (resigned to a 6 year 72 mil contract that starts at 10 mil)

Bench: Douglas, Walker, Chandler, Baron, 2nd round pick, vet, vet

AUTOADVERT
sidsanders
Posts: 22541
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2009
Member: #2426

5/4/2010  1:35 AM
1 wrote:Would you be willing to trade Gallinari, Eddy Curry, 3 mil and a 2nd rounder for Johnny Flynn? That trade gives the Knicks the potential to sign 2 maximum players and David Lee. The lineup then could potentially be:

Flynn
McGrady (resigned for a 1 year 2 mil contract)
Lebron (max contract)
Bosh (max contract)
David Lee (resigned to a 6 year 72 mil contract that starts at 10 mil)

Bench: Douglas, Walker, Chandler, Baron, 2nd round pick, vet, vet

no. too much to give up while counting on scoring 2 major FAs

GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
5/4/2010  2:01 AM
I've been over Bosh a long time. I'm not huge on Stouds either, but at least he shows fire (Despite a questionable attitude. Bosh's defense is just as bad as Lees, so that frontcourt would be just as bad as what we have now on the defensive end. I would rather not pay huge money on both of those guys. I'd rather just keep Lee and maybe wait it out and see if anyone else becomes available.(While getting LeBron of course.)
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34064
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

5/4/2010  3:20 AM
I like the idea, though I would demand Rubio come back instead. Though I do like Gallo more than Lee.

If we could deal Chandler and Douglas in lieu of Gallo I'd pull the trigger.

Rubio
Gallo
LBJ
Lee
Bosh

That floats my boat

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/4/2010  3:41 AM
i'd rather keep Gallinari then trade him just so we can clear enough cap to overpay for David Lee... DW's mentality of giving up our young assets to clear a few mil in cap space is becoming infectious apparently.

if there's a deal i would pursue with MIN, it's a Chandler for Rubio swap... doubt MIN would give up Rubio tho.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
5/4/2010  7:04 AM
Chandler for Flynn is as far as I'd go. They don't need anything else from us.

Gallo is untouchable as of now beyond landing Bosh, Amare, Wade, LeBron in an S&T.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
5/4/2010  8:05 AM
I think they'd be stupid to turn down Chandler for Rubio were they to pick Wall.

But we are talking Minny, here.

fishmike
Posts: 53863
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
5/4/2010  8:07 AM
franco12 wrote:I think they'd be stupid to turn down Chandler for Rubio were they to pick Wall.

But we are talking Minny, here.

it would be hard to give up Chandler for an unproven kid and there are massive hurdles in getting him over here next year if we did trade for him. He's 2 years away because of that buyout
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Nalod
Posts: 71297
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
5/4/2010  8:58 AM
Gallo>Flynn
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

5/4/2010  9:04 AM
Don't think that Flynn proved enough to me last year to give up a Chandler or Gallo for him. If it was S.Curry instead of Flynn being discussed, that might be another case, though.

The Knicks are just not going to give up Gallinari at this point unless you are getting one of the top tier FA's back in some kind of sign and trade. This past season was too intriguing for Walsh and MDA to give him up unless they are getting a star caliber player back in return.

And if Gallo shows marked improvement next year, with a few "wow" games, he is going to be in the near untouchable category.

We still don't know where he will end up as a player, and until we have a better idea, he remains a Knick.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
5/4/2010  9:24 AM
i think if minnesota gets the first pick they take evan turner, but that's just me. let's say they did take wall. i'd then offer them chandler for rubio and be done with it.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
fishmike
Posts: 53863
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
5/4/2010  10:08 AM
Collison is better than Flynn.

Gallo >>>>> Flynn

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
5/4/2010  10:41 AM
Minnesota wants Evan Turner not John Wall.
NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
Moonangie
Posts: 24766
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 7/9/2009
Member: #2788

5/4/2010  11:46 AM
Paladin55 wrote:Don't think that Flynn proved enough to me last year to give up a Chandler or Gallo for him. If it was S.Curry instead of Flynn being discussed, that might be another case, though.

The Knicks are just not going to give up Gallinari at this point unless you are getting one of the top tier FA's back in some kind of sign and trade. This past season was too intriguing for Walsh and MDA to give him up unless they are getting a star caliber player back in return.

And if Gallo shows marked improvement next year, with a few "wow" games, he is going to be in the near untouchable category.

We still don't know where he will end up as a player, and until we have a better idea, he remains a Knick.

He's already in the untouchable category.

Moonangie
Posts: 24766
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 7/9/2009
Member: #2788

5/4/2010  11:47 AM
nyk4ever wrote:i think if minnesota gets the first pick they take evan turner, but that's just me. let's say they did take wall. i'd then offer them chandler for rubio and be done with it.

Word. Chandler for Rubio.

1
Posts: 20195
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #575
Burkina Faso (Upper Volta)
5/4/2010  2:47 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/4/2010  2:48 PM
I'm surprised that no one here is interested in that trade. If the Knicks put together a 25 year old LeBron, a 26 year old Bosh and a 25 year old David Lee, they essentially guarantee the next 4 championships barring injury. That's worth Gallinari. The trade also gives the Knicks Flynn.

The posters who think that the Knicks could trade Chandler for Rubio are delusional. The Twolves turned down Chandler and the #8 pick last year for Rubio.

Panos
Posts: 30106
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
5/4/2010  2:51 PM
AnubisADL wrote:Minnesota wants Evan Turner not John Wall.

I think they're going to trade some front court players for another top pick and select both.

Moonangie
Posts: 24766
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 7/9/2009
Member: #2788

5/4/2010  3:12 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/4/2010  3:13 PM
1 wrote:I'm surprised that no one here is interested in that trade. If the Knicks put together a 25 year old LeBron, a 26 year old Bosh and a 25 year old David Lee, they essentially guarantee the next 4 championships barring injury. That's worth Gallinari. The trade also gives the Knicks Flynn.

The posters who think that the Knicks could trade Chandler for Rubio are delusional. The Twolves turned down Chandler and the #8 pick last year for Rubio.

Chandler is a better player now than he was last year. Rubio hasn't done jack in the NBA and they would ostensibly want a solid/defensive wing like Chandler more than a glut of potential (Wall, Rubio, Flynn) at the 1 spot. Wall will be a number one pick, which is a big contract. No sense keeping Rubio. Flynn is far more NBA ready than Ricky at this point. Rubio is a risk for them (and really any team that already has an excellent PG). Since the Knicks have very little at the 1, Rubio makes sense for us to take the gamble.

I'm not saying some other team with a crappy back court might not make a better offer than Chandler. That's possible and might force us to give up a future pick or even TD. We'll just have to wait and see.

93BUICK
Posts: 22281
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/6/2006
Member: #1175
USA
5/4/2010  4:21 PM
1 wrote:I'm surprised that no one here is interested in that trade. If the Knicks put together a 25 year old LeBron, a 26 year old Bosh and a 25 year old David Lee, they essentially guarantee the next 4 championships barring injury. That's worth Gallinari. The trade also gives the Knicks Flynn.

The posters who think that the Knicks could trade Chandler for Rubio are delusional. The Twolves turned down Chandler and the #8 pick last year for Rubio.

It's an ok idea but there are A LOT of good scenarios if we sign LeBron and Bosh. Making that trade before having those guys would be insane.

If you are still following the team and reading sites like this, there is nothing, short of your own demise, that is going to throw you off this train.
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
5/4/2010  4:56 PM
If Minnesota gets the top pick I would think they'd take Evan Turner, no?
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
If Minnesota gets John Wall...

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy