I guess people will justify those DNP's by pointing out the depth in boston instead of facing reality about nate. But if thats cas why has boston been searching for the last 24 month for a lagit back up to rondo, aquire one then rearly use him.

Wait...oh...

Jared Jeffries is not playing and Jordan Hill is putting up mediocre stats. FIRE WALSH.

Oh, wait... yeah.

Larry Hughes is tearing it up in Charlotte! FIRE WALSH!!!

Oh, wait.

LOL

I guess things aren't as bad as they seem for us. But that isn't any fun to dwell on. FIRE MIKE FIRE WALSH!!! That's more fun.

Cosmic wrote:Fire Walsh!!!!

Wait...oh...

Jared Jeffries is not playing and Jordan Hill is putting up mediocre stats. FIRE WALSH.

Oh, wait... yeah.

Larry Hughes is tearing it up in Charlotte! FIRE WALSH!!!

Oh, wait.

LOL

I guess things aren't as bad as they seem for us. But that isn't any fun to dwell on. FIRE MIKE FIRE WALSH!!! That's more fun.

Cosmic wrote:It's quite obvious that Walsh and Mike get trashed for the past two years for no reason at all. It doesn't need to be pointed out by me it's there to be seen. It's pathetic to see given it's obvious what the franchise's plan has been all along the past two years. But, well, people will feel free to blast it as if the plan was to compete with this messed up leftover roster and those people still pine for Isiah's 146M roster and cling to hopes one more MLE signing would have put it over the top. The top of what I do not know. 33 wins was one hell of an accomplishment! lol.

so anyone who thinks mistakes have been made miss laymass era? stop taking the hyperbole about why folks have criticized, many have said clearly why and it has zero to do with curry/jc/zro/etc. hill is brought up not cuz he is elite, to me it doesnt matter if you like the guy or not, the whole process was handled poorly.

as stated a few times today (and many before that), i hope they get lbj and/or wade cuz if so, none of the hill biz will matter and any goof who DOES miss zro/craw/marbs/etc shouldnt mention them again.

Nate wasn't right for this coach and some expected him to do so well that it would embarrass MDA. We got good value in the trade and can just move forward. The idea is to stop dealing with players that don't understand how to play winning BB. IMO Nate is that kind of player. He just hasn't learned what it takes to win. Maybe being in Boston can help him.

TMS wrote:again, i have yet to see anyone not acknowledge the fact that DW got back good value in the Nate Robinson trade after the fact... u'r just reaching for any reason to take cheap shots at anyone who's been critical of the job he's done in other moves he's made... but hey, if it makes u feel better to do so, be my guest.

Some fans do not like what Walsh and Mike did, others are OK with it, and some are supportive to what Knicks management is doing.
This is all normal.
To me it means that Mike and Walsh are working and trying. They do make mistakes. People always do when they are really working on something.
So lets wait for results which will come no earlier that 2 years from now....

sidsanders wrote:

arkrud wrote:

TMS wrote:again, i have yet to see anyone not acknowledge the fact that DW got back good value in the Nate Robinson trade after the fact... u'r just reaching for any reason to take cheap shots at anyone who's been critical of the job he's done in other moves he's made... but hey, if it makes u feel better to do so, be my guest.

Some fans do not like what Walsh and Mike did, others are OK with it, and some are supportive to what Knicks management is doing.
This is all normal.
To me it means that Mike and Walsh are working and trying. They do make mistakes. People always do when they are really working on something.
So lets wait for results which will come no earlier that 2 years from now....

isnt that a bit excessive? hey, if they hit all the main targets THIS offseason and win a title (best case scenario), do we need to wait 2 years from now to say it was a success? i cant think of what you would call a well run pro sports franchise that would give folks 4 years before any judgement could be made

Yeah, I'm more or less supportive of what they (Walsh in particular) are trying to do, but I do expect improvement NEXT SEASON. Otherwise... I am raising chickens and stocking up on tar, just in case.

BasketballJones wrote:

sidsanders wrote:

arkrud wrote:

TMS wrote:again, i have yet to see anyone not acknowledge the fact that DW got back good value in the Nate Robinson trade after the fact... u'r just reaching for any reason to take cheap shots at anyone who's been critical of the job he's done in other moves he's made... but hey, if it makes u feel better to do so, be my guest.

Some fans do not like what Walsh and Mike did, others are OK with it, and some are supportive to what Knicks management is doing.
This is all normal.
To me it means that Mike and Walsh are working and trying. They do make mistakes. People always do when they are really working on something.
So lets wait for results which will come no earlier that 2 years from now....

isnt that a bit excessive? hey, if they hit all the main targets THIS offseason and win a title (best case scenario), do we need to wait 2 years from now to say it was a success? i cant think of what you would call a well run pro sports franchise that would give folks 4 years before any judgement could be made

Yeah, I'm more or less supportive of what they (Walsh in particular) are trying to do, but I do expect improvement NEXT SEASON. Otherwise... I am raising chickens and stocking up on tar, just in case.

can u elaborate on what you'll be doing this summer just in case we fail in free agency? the other hundred takes of yours on the same lame joke didn't seem to get the message across.