[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

How would Patrick Ewing do as a Head coach for the Knicks in 2010 and with Oakley as an assistant?
Author Thread
Papabear
Posts: 24380
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 3/31/2007
Member: #1414

2/6/2010  9:04 PM
Papabear Says

I truly beleive that Ewing is the Knicks coach of the future. He has been an assistant for 7 years and he bleeds Knicks blood. What do you think?

Papabear
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/6/2010  9:06 PM
as a bigman's coach i'd love to bring him on board... as a rookie head coach w/no prior head coaching experience, hell no.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
2/6/2010  9:09 PM
He wouldn't be as funny in losing like D'Antoni. Besides no player would know who he is like they know D'Antoni. Well at least that's how I keep hearing is the main selling point.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Papabear
Posts: 24380
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 3/31/2007
Member: #1414

2/6/2010  9:14 PM
TMS wrote:as a bigman's coach i'd love to bring him on board... as a rookie head coach w/no prior head coaching experience, hell no.

Papabear Says

Why? if anyone know's the Knick it would be Ewing. I say give him a chance.

Papabear
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
2/6/2010  10:13 PM
I don't know how Ewing would do. I wish the Knicks would have kept Thibs around and given him a shot. Ewing deserves a shot and has proven himself as an assistant. I don't know why he hasn't been brought back and I didn't like the way his son was treated when he was cut because Roberson fit ssol better.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/6/2010  10:22 PM
OH Please, just keep MDA and get winning talent in here. Even if you have a lousy coach you can win if you have top talent, just ask the Cavs. It's not very complicated. Nearly all the top coaches had bigtime talent when they won their Titles. Riley was winning with a mostly offensive team in LA and no one complained. 1st get great talent! Ewing could win if we're loaded with talent, so why not him down the line. It's not like he and Oakley are a lock to be great coaches just cuz they were tough NBA players.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
2/6/2010  10:26 PM
nixluva wrote:OH Please, just keep MDA and get winning talent in here. Even if you have a lousy coach you can win if you have top talent, just ask the Cavs. It's not very complicated. Nearly all the top coaches had bigtime talent when they won their Titles. Riley was winning with a mostly offensive team in LA and no one complained. 1st get great talent! Ewing could win if we're loaded with talent, so why not him down the line. It's not like he and Oakley are a lock to be great coaches just cuz they were tough NBA players.
I think you could make an argument that MDA was Mike Brown in Phoenix if you consider that his record without Nash is 84-151.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Nalod
Posts: 71764
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
2/6/2010  10:41 PM

When Panic: Break glass and starphuch.

Hey, I remember when some thought Starks would make a good coach.

Ewing can't even get an interview anywhere.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/6/2010  10:46 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:OH Please, just keep MDA and get winning talent in here. Even if you have a lousy coach you can win if you have top talent, just ask the Cavs. It's not very complicated. Nearly all the top coaches had bigtime talent when they won their Titles. Riley was winning with a mostly offensive team in LA and no one complained. 1st get great talent! Ewing could win if we're loaded with talent, so why not him down the line. It's not like he and Oakley are a lock to be great coaches just cuz they were tough NBA players.
I think you could make an argument that MDA was Mike Brown in Phoenix if you consider that his record without Nash is 84-151.

Really? Then why do many of the greatest basketball minds in coaching hold MDA in such high regard? I think in this case MDA was no Mike Brown. PHX all but conceded that MDA's system was better for their team this year. Thing is that under MDA the Suns were a MUCH better defensive team!!! This year their point Diff is only 2.60 when under MDA they were ALWAYS one of the best in the league in Point Diff. In 2006-07 PHX was a +7.3 right behind S.A. +8.4. The Spurs as you remember beat PHX in that controversial series. MDA and the Suns could've won that series if things hadn't gone crazy.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
2/6/2010  11:29 PM
nixluva wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:OH Please, just keep MDA and get winning talent in here. Even if you have a lousy coach you can win if you have top talent, just ask the Cavs. It's not very complicated. Nearly all the top coaches had bigtime talent when they won their Titles. Riley was winning with a mostly offensive team in LA and no one complained. 1st get great talent! Ewing could win if we're loaded with talent, so why not him down the line. It's not like he and Oakley are a lock to be great coaches just cuz they were tough NBA players.
I think you could make an argument that MDA was Mike Brown in Phoenix if you consider that his record without Nash is 84-151.

Really? Then why do many of the greatest basketball minds in coaching hold MDA in such high regard? I think in this case MDA was no Mike Brown. PHX all but conceded that MDA's system was better for their team this year. Thing is that under MDA the Suns were a MUCH better defensive team!!! This year their point Diff is only 2.60 when under MDA they were ALWAYS one of the best in the league in Point Diff. In 2006-07 PHX was a +7.3 right behind S.A. +8.4. The Spurs as you remember beat PHX in that controversial series. MDA and the Suns could've won that series if things hadn't gone crazy.

Both have been coaches of the year. One has made it to the finals. One has always had a star the other has failed miserably when he doesn't have Steve Nash. I think it is a fair comparison. Brown also was a part of one of the most successful runs of a professional team as an assistant with the Spurs.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
2/6/2010  11:56 PM
No thanks, Can you imangine his post game conference's
ES
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
2/6/2010  11:56 PM
No thanks, Can you imangine his post game conference's
ES
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/7/2010  12:12 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:OH Please, just keep MDA and get winning talent in here. Even if you have a lousy coach you can win if you have top talent, just ask the Cavs. It's not very complicated. Nearly all the top coaches had bigtime talent when they won their Titles. Riley was winning with a mostly offensive team in LA and no one complained. 1st get great talent! Ewing could win if we're loaded with talent, so why not him down the line. It's not like he and Oakley are a lock to be great coaches just cuz they were tough NBA players.
I think you could make an argument that MDA was Mike Brown in Phoenix if you consider that his record without Nash is 84-151.

Really? Then why do many of the greatest basketball minds in coaching hold MDA in such high regard? I think in this case MDA was no Mike Brown. PHX all but conceded that MDA's system was better for their team this year. Thing is that under MDA the Suns were a MUCH better defensive team!!! This year their point Diff is only 2.60 when under MDA they were ALWAYS one of the best in the league in Point Diff. In 2006-07 PHX was a +7.3 right behind S.A. +8.4. The Spurs as you remember beat PHX in that controversial series. MDA and the Suns could've won that series if things hadn't gone crazy.

Both have been coaches of the year. One has made it to the finals. One has always had a star the other has failed miserably when he doesn't have Steve Nash. I think it is a fair comparison. Brown also was a part of one of the most successful runs of a professional team as an assistant with the Spurs.

Dude just say that MDA hasn't done well when he has had bad teams, cuz really it's not about Nash. He's one component to having a good team, but he also had Amare & Marion on that team. What kind of team has he had here and in that short stint in Denver, with another record level bad team, you keep wanting to include? How about MDA lost those games cuz he had really bad teams period.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
2/7/2010  1:01 AM
So MDA is a good coach when he has three all nba guys, Stoudamire, Marion, and Nash and the league MVP. If that is his recipe for success my guess is that there are alot of other guys that might even be able to make it to the finals with that roster. Does MDA get a pass until the Knicks have the league MVP and two other all nba players?
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/7/2010  1:19 AM
nixluva wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:OH Please, just keep MDA and get winning talent in here. Even if you have a lousy coach you can win if you have top talent, just ask the Cavs. It's not very complicated. Nearly all the top coaches had bigtime talent when they won their Titles. Riley was winning with a mostly offensive team in LA and no one complained. 1st get great talent! Ewing could win if we're loaded with talent, so why not him down the line. It's not like he and Oakley are a lock to be great coaches just cuz they were tough NBA players.
I think you could make an argument that MDA was Mike Brown in Phoenix if you consider that his record without Nash is 84-151.

Really? Then why do many of the greatest basketball minds in coaching hold MDA in such high regard? I think in this case MDA was no Mike Brown. PHX all but conceded that MDA's system was better for their team this year. Thing is that under MDA the Suns were a MUCH better defensive team!!! This year their point Diff is only 2.60 when under MDA they were ALWAYS one of the best in the league in Point Diff. In 2006-07 PHX was a +7.3 right behind S.A. +8.4. The Spurs as you remember beat PHX in that controversial series. MDA and the Suns could've won that series if things hadn't gone crazy.

Both have been coaches of the year. One has made it to the finals. One has always had a star the other has failed miserably when he doesn't have Steve Nash. I think it is a fair comparison. Brown also was a part of one of the most successful runs of a professional team as an assistant with the Spurs.

Dude just say that MDA hasn't done well when he has had bad teams, cuz really it's not about Nash. He's one component to having a good team, but he also had Amare & Marion on that team. What kind of team has he had here and in that short stint in Denver, with another record level bad team, you keep wanting to include? How about MDA lost those games cuz he had really bad teams period.

he did have Shawn Marion, Joe Johnson & Leandro Barbosa for much of the '03 season, his 1st season in Phoenix... Amare missed about 30 games that year, but they still had enough talent to be more than a 21W - 40L team under him that season IMO... right now there's nothing to judge MDA's success on other than when he's had an MVP calibre PG running his system along w/2-3 other Allstar calibre players.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/7/2010  1:49 AM
TMS wrote:
nixluva wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:OH Please, just keep MDA and get winning talent in here. Even if you have a lousy coach you can win if you have top talent, just ask the Cavs. It's not very complicated. Nearly all the top coaches had bigtime talent when they won their Titles. Riley was winning with a mostly offensive team in LA and no one complained. 1st get great talent! Ewing could win if we're loaded with talent, so why not him down the line. It's not like he and Oakley are a lock to be great coaches just cuz they were tough NBA players.
I think you could make an argument that MDA was Mike Brown in Phoenix if you consider that his record without Nash is 84-151.

Really? Then why do many of the greatest basketball minds in coaching hold MDA in such high regard? I think in this case MDA was no Mike Brown. PHX all but conceded that MDA's system was better for their team this year. Thing is that under MDA the Suns were a MUCH better defensive team!!! This year their point Diff is only 2.60 when under MDA they were ALWAYS one of the best in the league in Point Diff. In 2006-07 PHX was a +7.3 right behind S.A. +8.4. The Spurs as you remember beat PHX in that controversial series. MDA and the Suns could've won that series if things hadn't gone crazy.

Both have been coaches of the year. One has made it to the finals. One has always had a star the other has failed miserably when he doesn't have Steve Nash. I think it is a fair comparison. Brown also was a part of one of the most successful runs of a professional team as an assistant with the Spurs.

Dude just say that MDA hasn't done well when he has had bad teams, cuz really it's not about Nash. He's one component to having a good team, but he also had Amare & Marion on that team. What kind of team has he had here and in that short stint in Denver, with another record level bad team, you keep wanting to include? How about MDA lost those games cuz he had really bad teams period.

he did have Shawn Marion, Joe Johnson & Leandro Barbosa for much of the '03 season, his 1st season in Phoenix... Amare missed about 30 games that year, but they still had enough talent to be more than a 21W - 40L team under him that season IMO... right now there's nothing to judge MDA's success on other than when he's had an MVP calibre PG running his system along w/2-3 other Allstar calibre players.

MDA took over after a rough start by Coach Johnson and with Marbs as PG and really that team wasn't ready to win anything when he took over, after the big trade with NY, but they made progress which is why management kept him as Head coach. The choice was validated by how well the team played from there on. He took a team that at the beginning of the next season wasn't expected to do much, but MDA had that team ready and they went 62-20!!! That's a pretty good rebound from the year before and yeah he had good talent to work with and he showed what he could do with a decent talent level, tho not a great team!

People tend to overlook the fact that PHX wasn't that stocked with talent. Those players were pretty good, but this is the same Amare that people now feel isn't worth a Max contract from us. Sean Marion hasn't done anything since leaving the Suns. Nash became great under MDA and he's about the best thing they had, yet he's not a perfect player if you judge his poor defense as part of the equation and add that to Amare's poor defense as well. MDA did great with that team. He had that team playing above it's head if you really look at it. His system was perfect for the kinds of players he had. They all flourished in that style.

Then he won 54 games without Amare!!! How is that not showing what kind of coach he is? It's too easy to forget what the guy did with a roster that wasn't full of great players. Just Nash and Marion and he still won 54 games!?! How good did he make Diaw, Bell and KT look?

TMS believes that MDA wouldn't win with a good PG unless it was Nash, but just look at how much we're able to score without a good PG. We are still a pretty hard team to stop from scoring despite the fact that we have no floor general. I guarantee that if you put a good PG on this same roster he'd get a lot more mileage out of this team than he has. Nash was a big part of the success, but more than any other coach he Maxed Out Nash's potential and that is great coaching. If Dallas had any idea that Nash could be an MVP level player they would never have let him go.

knickstorrents
Posts: 21121
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/23/2010
Member: #3050
Hong Kong
2/7/2010  1:57 AM
nixluva wrote:TMS believes that MDA wouldn't win with a good PG unless it was Nash, but just look at how much we're able to score without a good PG. We are still a pretty hard team to stop from scoring despite the fact that we have no floor general. I guarantee that if you put a good PG on this same roster he'd get a lot more mileage out of this team than he has. Nash was a big part of the success, but more than any other coach he Maxed Out Nash's potential and that is great coaching. If Dallas had any idea that Nash could be an MVP level player they would never have let him go.

+1, well said my man!!!

Rose is not the answer.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/7/2010  1:59 AM
nixluva wrote:
TMS wrote:
nixluva wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:OH Please, just keep MDA and get winning talent in here. Even if you have a lousy coach you can win if you have top talent, just ask the Cavs. It's not very complicated. Nearly all the top coaches had bigtime talent when they won their Titles. Riley was winning with a mostly offensive team in LA and no one complained. 1st get great talent! Ewing could win if we're loaded with talent, so why not him down the line. It's not like he and Oakley are a lock to be great coaches just cuz they were tough NBA players.
I think you could make an argument that MDA was Mike Brown in Phoenix if you consider that his record without Nash is 84-151.

Really? Then why do many of the greatest basketball minds in coaching hold MDA in such high regard? I think in this case MDA was no Mike Brown. PHX all but conceded that MDA's system was better for their team this year. Thing is that under MDA the Suns were a MUCH better defensive team!!! This year their point Diff is only 2.60 when under MDA they were ALWAYS one of the best in the league in Point Diff. In 2006-07 PHX was a +7.3 right behind S.A. +8.4. The Spurs as you remember beat PHX in that controversial series. MDA and the Suns could've won that series if things hadn't gone crazy.

Both have been coaches of the year. One has made it to the finals. One has always had a star the other has failed miserably when he doesn't have Steve Nash. I think it is a fair comparison. Brown also was a part of one of the most successful runs of a professional team as an assistant with the Spurs.

Dude just say that MDA hasn't done well when he has had bad teams, cuz really it's not about Nash. He's one component to having a good team, but he also had Amare & Marion on that team. What kind of team has he had here and in that short stint in Denver, with another record level bad team, you keep wanting to include? How about MDA lost those games cuz he had really bad teams period.

he did have Shawn Marion, Joe Johnson & Leandro Barbosa for much of the '03 season, his 1st season in Phoenix... Amare missed about 30 games that year, but they still had enough talent to be more than a 21W - 40L team under him that season IMO... right now there's nothing to judge MDA's success on other than when he's had an MVP calibre PG running his system along w/2-3 other Allstar calibre players.

MDA took over after a rough start by Coach Johnson and with Marbs as PG and really that team wasn't ready to win anything when he took over, after the big trade with NY, but they made progress which is why management kept him as Head coach. The choice was validated by how well the team played from there on. He took a team that at the beginning of the next season wasn't expected to do much, but MDA had that team ready and they went 62-20!!! That's a pretty good rebound from the year before and yeah he had good talent to work with and he showed what he could do with a decent talent level, tho not a great team!

People tend to overlook the fact that PHX wasn't that stocked with talent. Those players were pretty good, but this is the same Amare that people now feel isn't worth a Max contract from us. Sean Marion hasn't done anything since leaving the Suns. Nash became great under MDA and he's about the best thing they had, yet he's not a perfect player if you judge his poor defense as part of the equation and add that to Amare's poor defense as well. MDA did great with that team. He had that team playing above it's head if you really look at it. His system was perfect for the kinds of players he had. They all flourished in that style.

Then he won 54 games without Amare!!! How is that not showing what kind of coach he is? It's too easy to forget what the guy did with a roster that wasn't full of great players. Just Nash and Marion and he still won 54 games!?! How good did he make Diaw, Bell and KT look?

TMS believes that MDA wouldn't win with a good PG unless it was Nash, but just look at how much we're able to score without a good PG. We are still a pretty hard team to stop from scoring despite the fact that we have no floor general. I guarantee that if you put a good PG on this same roster he'd get a lot more mileage out of this team than he has. Nash was a big part of the success, but more than any other coach he Maxed Out Nash's potential and that is great coaching. If Dallas had any idea that Nash could be an MVP level player they would never have let him go.

as usual u take my words out of context to try & prove some point... i never said i didn't believe MDA could succeed w/o Nash... i said MDA hasn't proven he could succeed w/o Nash... i happen to think MDA is a good coach, but really there's nothing to back up your claims that he can succeed in NY if we just added any good PG to the roster other than your own conjecture.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
2/7/2010  2:04 AM
The reason people think Amare isn't worth a max contract is because of major knee issues, an issue with his retina that almost caused blindness and some concerns about attitude/effort and character. Amare isn't the same guy D'Antoni coached. His eye injury almost blinded him. He is a succes story for micro fracture surgery but if you look at the marquee free agents I think he has the most injury concerns.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
2/7/2010  2:38 AM
it's funny.

theres only one coach who has succeeded without having an MVP caliber player and the fans have already run him out of town here (larry brown). so now we are going to run d'antoni out of town because the team sucks and there isn't an mvp caliber player (yet)?

yeah makes a whole lot of sense. people need to realize the expectations (realistic ones) and stop being such babies.

"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
How would Patrick Ewing do as a Head coach for the Knicks in 2010 and with Oakley as an assistant?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy