[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The david lee smoke screen
Author Thread
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
1/16/2010  1:06 PM
I think we were so pitifull in the begining of the season, and the east is as weak as it's ever been that we feel like were taking strides. We started out pretty decent last season and fizzle right about this time of the season.


http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/teams/schedule?team=nyk&year=2009

Were about a game or 2 better, that lost to the NETS (everybody else is blowing them out by double digits) was sort of a reality check. David lee, jeffries and Chandler are playing better, the D is a little better, but nate, duhon, bender, and al have played ridiculously inconsistant. If we lose Tonight were pretty much in the same spot we were in last year at this time. Last nights lost was also a tell tell sign that we haven't made much strides. Here we are coming off a solid road win, and then come out and give up 112pts -to a suppose to be- a lousy defensive team.

I guess we have been blinded by david lee's vast improvement that we don't even notice how bad the rest of the team is playing.

ES
AUTOADVERT
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
1/16/2010  1:09 PM
Yea but all this is with a group of guys that have no stake in the future of the club and no promise that they will return next year. Superficially, maybe no much improvement; considering the circumstances, it's an admirable feat.
WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
1/16/2010  2:48 PM
Having Gallo as a starter is tough. He's ridiculously inconsistent, but does just enough game-to-game to merit minutes.

Gallo is the right idea for a player in this system, but until the team knows what he'll bring every night, he's going to prevent us from winning more than he'll help.

I feel like the 1-9 start from this team was probably the worst coaching job that MikeD's ever done, but the stretch since then just might be the best he's ever done.

Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
Nalod
Posts: 71765
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
1/16/2010  3:29 PM
Gallo and Wilson are inconsistant, but they are less so as the season goes. The team is improving.
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/16/2010  4:52 PM
JohnWallace44 wrote:Having Gallo as a starter is tough. He's ridiculously inconsistent, but does just enough game-to-game to merit minutes.

Gallo is the right idea for a player in this system, but until the team knows what he'll bring every night, he's going to prevent us from winning more than he'll help.

I feel like the 1-9 start from this team was probably the worst coaching job that MikeD's ever done, but the stretch since then just might be the best he's ever done.

I think that 1-9 start went well beyond coaching. Every single player was playing like they didn't even care they were alive. Every single one.

Even if some behind the scenes situations led to it - like who was going to start and who wasn't going to play - and who might get traded - and we won't be here past this year. I don't want to hear all that. Professional players are supposed to be ready to bring it every night no matter the circumstance.

None of them did. NONE OF THEM.

That goes beyond coaching.

Look, guys, this season is like any other season over the past 8 years or so. A mediocre roster that starts slow, finally finds a rhythm and usually finds themselves in a favorable stretch of the schedule, plays about .500 for a while (Isiah did it for 50 games, we've done it for 30), then the injuries and fatigue set in because they aren't really big time players meant for big minutes, the schedule stiffens back up, we start to lose games again, the mental side creeps back in and the team falls apart as playoff teams are playing like playoff teams and non-playoff teams who stuck around for a bit fall by the wayside.

This season will be no different.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

1/16/2010  4:55 PM
JohnWallace44 wrote:Having Gallo as a starter is tough. He's ridiculously inconsistent, but does just enough game-to-game to merit minutes.

Gallo is the right idea for a player in this system, but until the team knows what he'll bring every night, he's going to prevent us from winning more than he'll help.

I feel like the 1-9 start from this team was probably the worst coaching job that MikeD's ever done, but the stretch since then just might be the best he's ever done.


Gallinari gets his minutes because even when his shooting is off on a particular night, he has usually given MDA consistent effort on D, he picks up some rebounds, and he moves the ball around well on O, even when his shots are not falling. Offensive consistency should (will) come as he gets stronger, but MDA seems pretty comfortable having him out there, and IMO, it is because of the things he does other than shooting the ball.
No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
1/17/2010  6:55 PM
Cosmic wrote:
JohnWallace44 wrote:Having Gallo as a starter is tough. He's ridiculously inconsistent, but does just enough game-to-game to merit minutes.

Gallo is the right idea for a player in this system, but until the team knows what he'll bring every night, he's going to prevent us from winning more than he'll help.

I feel like the 1-9 start from this team was probably the worst coaching job that MikeD's ever done, but the stretch since then just might be the best he's ever done.

I think that 1-9 start went well beyond coaching. Every single player was playing like they didn't even care they were alive. Every single one.

Even if some behind the scenes situations led to it - like who was going to start and who wasn't going to play - and who might get traded - and we won't be here past this year. I don't want to hear all that. Professional players are supposed to be ready to bring it every night no matter the circumstance.

None of them did. NONE OF THEM.

That goes beyond coaching.

Look, guys, this season is like any other season over the past 8 years or so. A mediocre roster that starts slow, finally finds a rhythm and usually finds themselves in a favorable stretch of the schedule, plays about .500 for a while (Isiah did it for 50 games, we've done it for 30), then the injuries and fatigue set in because they aren't really big time players meant for big minutes, the schedule stiffens back up, we start to lose games again, the mental side creeps back in and the team falls apart as playoff teams are playing like playoff teams and non-playoff teams who stuck around for a bit fall by the wayside.

This season will be no different.


Exactly, and a few weeks ago when Mike breen as MDA if that was going to be the case, he emphaticaly said not at all. But until we get a pg that can ball ( cause we dont have dominate super star) were arn't going no where.

No one on this team is consistant, and LEE is starting to fall in love with that jump shot.

ES
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/17/2010  7:16 PM
Gallo has played 67 NBA games. Chandler has played 150.

If you guy want consistancy we should bring back Kurt Thomas and Malik Rose. We are playing young guys. We have guys making a fortune who arent playing because we are featuring guys in rookie contracts still. This is everything Knick fans have bitched for in recent years. Let the young guys play.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
VDesai
Posts: 43296
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
1/17/2010  10:39 PM
Gallo isn't really even all that inconsistent when you consider he's basically a rookie in terms of games played. In fact I'm amazed at how much he is able to bring to the table at this point in his career.

The guy who's inconsistency can't be excused and who is hurting us the most is Duhon.

arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
1/18/2010  12:19 AM
What a you smokking?...to set this screen..
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/18/2010  7:29 AM
Kosmovitelli of RGM wrote this on Lee. Kosmo for those that don't know is probably one of the most intelligent and level headed Knicks fans I've ever seen. Probably knows more about the game than the entire rest of that forum combined. Never has an agenda.

Give it a read...it's a good one. All of his posts are.

====

I think you all noticed David Lee has been playing too many minutes (46 and 48 minutes the last two games) and attempting too many shots recently.

About the minutes, David Lee is averaging 36.9 minutes per game this season but he played an average of 40.4 minutes the last 21 games (I started the count on december 4 : big win against Atlanta, beginning of a four game winning streak and the start of our playoff push).

About the FG attempts, David Lee took 574 shots during the first 40 games of the season, it's approx 14.4 per game. The interesting stat is that if you add the games when Lee attempted 14 FGs or more, we lost 14 times (and won 8 times). For what it's worth, Lee averaged 11.7 shots per game last season.

If you compare with Chris Bosh, he's averaging 35.3 minutes per game and attempted 587 FGs (approx 14.3 per game). Stats with 14 shots attempted or more : 12 wins and 10 losses.

Both players average 11.2 rebounds per game. David Lee has a better FG% with 0.561 (0.522 for Bosh) but Lee's averaging 19.3 pts per game (23.8 for Bosh). Bosh shoots as much as Lee (14.3 per game), he has a worse FG% but he's still the most productive player because there's a pretty big difference in their stats and you probably already guessed what it is : Lee shot 166 FTs this season and Bosh 378. Bosh is going to the FT line twice as much as Lee (2.3 to be more precise, approx 9,2 FT attempts per game for Bosh and 4.3 for Lee). Bosh is going to the FT line almost as much as Dwight Howard (who's averaging 10 FTs per game). If you compare with Zach Randolph, he's averaging 36.8 minutes, 20.5 pts, 11.5 reb, 16.1 FG attempts (way more than Lee and Bosh) and just like Lee he's not going to the FT line that much : 196 times in 39 games so approx 4.9 per game. I also took a look at Curry's stats when he was force-fed by Isiah and had his most productive season in NY in 2006-2007 : Curry attempted 12.5 shots per game and was going to the FT line 8.1 times per game. Curry was shooting less than Lee right now and although he was a terrific scoring option and a post player capable of commanding a double team, he was going less to the FT line than Bosh (Bosh averaged 8.5 FT per game that same 2006-2007 season).
I also noticed Chris Bosh had 9 blocks this month (Zach Randolph 3 blocks), you want the number for Lee ? It's easy : 0 ! Gallinari had 6 blocks this month and he's playing less than Lee.

If you want another comparison : Gallo is averaging 11 shots per game and Al Harrington 15 (more than Lee ! LOL). The most ridiculous thing for Al Harrington is he's only playing 30.6 mins per game.


I'll end it here. I'm not trying to say Lee is a bad player. Obviously he's a good player but is he currently a better player than Zach Randolph ? Considering how he's playing right now, he seems to be going in the Randolph direction. And I don't like that. If Lee continues to shoot that much but can't expand his game, can't draw double teams, go to the FT line and put opposing players in foul trouble or defend and block shots, you have to wonder if he has a future on this team. We already knew he was bad defender but I see little effort on defense (and the incredibly weak number of block shots clearly shows that he's not trying that hard for a player with his size).
I already saw fans claiming we should have inked him to a long term contract last summer because Lee's worth $14 mil per season right now but it ain't true. I don't even think he's worth more than $10 mil per season at this point. He's a complementary player, not a first option like he's used now.

Mike d'Antoni has to stop the circus with Lee and Harrington playing too many minutes and shooting the ball too much. They're not versatile enough to log so many minutes. D'Antoni has to find some balance with the roster.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
1/18/2010  7:59 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/18/2010  8:00 AM
Cosmic wrote:Kosmovitelli of RGM wrote this on Lee. Kosmo for those that don't know is probably one of the most intelligent and level headed Knicks fans I've ever seen. Probably knows more about the game than the entire rest of that forum combined. Never has an agenda.

Give it a read...it's a good one. All of his posts are.

====

I think you all noticed David Lee has been playing too many minutes (46 and 48 minutes the last two games) and attempting too many shots recently.

About the minutes, David Lee is averaging 36.9 minutes per game this season but he played an average of 40.4 minutes the last 21 games (I started the count on december 4 : big win against Atlanta, beginning of a four game winning streak and the start of our playoff push).

About the FG attempts, David Lee took 574 shots during the first 40 games of the season, it's approx 14.4 per game. The interesting stat is that if you add the games when Lee attempted 14 FGs or more, we lost 14 times (and won 8 times). For what it's worth, Lee averaged 11.7 shots per game last season.

If you compare with Chris Bosh, he's averaging 35.3 minutes per game and attempted 587 FGs (approx 14.3 per game). Stats with 14 shots attempted or more : 12 wins and 10 losses.

Both players average 11.2 rebounds per game. David Lee has a better FG% with 0.561 (0.522 for Bosh) but Lee's averaging 19.3 pts per game (23.8 for Bosh). Bosh shoots as much as Lee (14.3 per game), he has a worse FG% but he's still the most productive player because there's a pretty big difference in their stats and you probably already guessed what it is : Lee shot 166 FTs this season and Bosh 378. Bosh is going to the FT line twice as much as Lee (2.3 to be more precise, approx 9,2 FT attempts per game for Bosh and 4.3 for Lee). Bosh is going to the FT line almost as much as Dwight Howard (who's averaging 10 FTs per game). If you compare with Zach Randolph, he's averaging 36.8 minutes, 20.5 pts, 11.5 reb, 16.1 FG attempts (way more than Lee and Bosh) and just like Lee he's not going to the FT line that much : 196 times in 39 games so approx 4.9 per game. I also took a look at Curry's stats when he was force-fed by Isiah and had his most productive season in NY in 2006-2007 : Curry attempted 12.5 shots per game and was going to the FT line 8.1 times per game. Curry was shooting less than Lee right now and although he was a terrific scoring option and a post player capable of commanding a double team, he was going less to the FT line than Bosh (Bosh averaged 8.5 FT per game that same 2006-2007 season).
I also noticed Chris Bosh had 9 blocks this month (Zach Randolph 3 blocks), you want the number for Lee ? It's easy : 0 ! Gallinari had 6 blocks this month and he's playing less than Lee.

If you want another comparison : Gallo is averaging 11 shots per game and Al Harrington 15 (more than Lee ! LOL). The most ridiculous thing for Al Harrington is he's only playing 30.6 mins per game.


I'll end it here. I'm not trying to say Lee is a bad player. Obviously he's a good player but is he currently a better player than Zach Randolph ? Considering how he's playing right now, he seems to be going in the Randolph direction. And I don't like that. If Lee continues to shoot that much but can't expand his game, can't draw double teams, go to the FT line and put opposing players in foul trouble or defend and block shots, you have to wonder if he has a future on this team. We already knew he was bad defender but I see little effort on defense (and the incredibly weak number of block shots clearly shows that he's not trying that hard for a player with his size).
I already saw fans claiming we should have inked him to a long term contract last summer because Lee's worth $14 mil per season right now but it ain't true. I don't even think he's worth more than $10 mil per season at this point. He's a complementary player, not a first option like he's used now.

Mike d'Antoni has to stop the circus with Lee and Harrington playing too many minutes and shooting the ball too much. They're not versatile enough to log so many minutes. D'Antoni has to find some balance with the roster.

This is not fair because of assists number - Lee -3.3 and Bosh/Zack - 2.0 each.
Zack is just finisher and Bosh is obviously max player and his athletish is on a other level that Lee.
But lee is the one of 3 who makes others on the team better (if he has anybody who can be better; and with the exception of Galo and Chan this is not the case with this Knicks)

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/18/2010  9:15 AM
How does Lee make teammates better? He seems to do his thing offensively with Duhon and no one else. He is a decent passer but it always goes back to Duhon. He's absolutely worthless on defense.

Lee makes Lee and Duhon better. No one else.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/18/2010  9:51 AM
Bosh is a superior offensive player and generates his own offense taking his man off the dribble more than Lee. Also we don't use Lee as a direct primary option. His shots come in the flow of the offense with fewer iso plays. I like Lee but he's not a primary guy.

He works great if you have a great breakdown player that can distribute the ball. Unlike Bosh Lee won't require the ball to still be effective and that is a plus if you add a Lebron. Guys that are used to being the focal point on offense don't always do well as a secondary guy. Lee can!

Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/18/2010  9:58 AM
Duhon slowing up the ball until Lee gets into position and then running the P&R or P&P with Lee isn't our primary play? You sure Nix?

I think it is our #1 offensive play. Our entire game is predicated on it.

David Lee converts 42% of Duhon's assists.

He is indeed the primary offensive weapon.

And when a team shuts it down...we're relegated to watching Chandler, Harrington, Duhon, Nate, Gallo chuck 30 footers.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/18/2010  10:45 AM
Cosmic wrote:Duhon slowing up the ball until Lee gets into position and then running the P&R or P&P with Lee isn't our primary play? You sure Nix?

I think it is our #1 offensive play. Our entire game is predicated on it.

David Lee converts 42% of Duhon's assists.

He is indeed the primary offensive weapon.

And when a team shuts it down...we're relegated to watching Chandler, Harrington, Duhon, Nate, Gallo chuck 30 footers.

Lee doesn't get a lot of iso plays where he is expected to draw a double due to the threat of breaking his man down and scoring. He of course is a primary option of Duhon but not a go to guy in the traditional sense which is how I meant it. It's a matter of Duhon's inability to create offensive looks for anyone else. Outside of pick n roll Lee isn't asked to do much else offensively cuz it's not his game.

There would be much more to the offense if Duhon was any good at doing anything else. Anyway my point was that Bosh is a max player type in that he can create his own offense and command a double. He draws fouls at a higher rate due to those breakdown skills. Lee is great for the scheme we play just don't ask him to be a breakdown player fulltime. Lee is crafty and I'm happy with his improved jumper. He'll make a great complement to any good PG.

King1
Posts: 22993
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2005
Member: #998
USA
1/18/2010  10:50 AM
I agree Bosh is a much better player but I dont see him as a max player. A max player to me can carry a team Kobe, Lebron, and Wade. Bosh has really good players around him and he is around 500. The free throws that Bosh shoots is because of how he is officiated. If you put a hand near him it is a foul. I think Bosh would be a championship number 2 type player but he wont lead a team to the finals by himself thus he deserves 13-15 million.
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
1/18/2010  11:18 AM
Impact players are those who get to the FT line and always gets double and triple team, Lee does either.

I agree with cosmic that Lee's impact on this team is minimal at best.
ES
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27678
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
1/18/2010  11:28 AM
King1 wrote:I agree Bosh is a much better player but I dont see him as a max player. A max player to me can carry a team Kobe, Lebron, and Wade. Bosh has really good players around him and he is around 500. The free throws that Bosh shoots is because of how he is officiated. If you put a hand near him it is a foul. I think Bosh would be a championship number 2 type player but he wont lead a team to the finals by himself thus he deserves 13-15 million.

I think the top 5 or 10 players using Player Efficiency Ratings are max players. By that standard, Bosh (#5 efficiency) is a max player.

You know I gonna spin wit it
King1
Posts: 22993
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2005
Member: #998
USA
1/18/2010  11:36 AM
I agree the top ten players should get max money. I wonder what Lee efficiency rating is lol. According to NBA. com it is 7
The david lee smoke screen

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy