[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Why is everyone worried about this team wearing down?
Author Thread
OldFan
Posts: 21456
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2003
Member: #446
1/10/2010  12:24 AM
Unless our players are just out of shape they should not be wearing down. We're not playing at a fast pace and we have one player on the entire team that is in the top 30 in minutes played - David Lee at 29th is getting 36 minutes a game. Yet every game thread poster are lamenting the short rotation and how our players are being over used.

The only guy I worry about is Duhon and because he seemed tired at the end of last year. But he's averaging < 35 minutes a game.

But I don't see where MDA "short rotation" is adding up to a lot of minutes for any one guy so I don't get this fear.

Feel free to explain what I'm missing...

AUTOADVERT
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
1/10/2010  12:45 AM
OldFan wrote:Unless our players are just out of shape they should not be wearing down. We're not playing at a fast pace and we have one player on the entire team that is in the top 30 in minutes played - David Lee at 29th is getting 36 minutes a game. Yet every game thread poster are lamenting the short rotation and how our players are being over used.

The only guy I worry about is Duhon and because he seemed tired at the end of last year. But he's averaging < 35 minutes a game.

But I don't see where MDA "short rotation" is adding up to a lot of minutes for any one guy so I don't get this fear.

Feel free to explain what I'm missing...

This is how I look at it. Starter vs. bench minutes. Al is the only other bench player other than Nate and Larry (which you have to factor in their miss games for DNP) with more than 16 minutes a night. They have like 5 guys averaging more than 30 minutes a game. 3 of those guys average ~ 35 minutes a game. There is a huge discrepancy with allotted of minutes vs. other teams particular playoff teams or those close to contention.

I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34071
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

1/10/2010  2:04 AM
MDA detractors need to fixate on some extreme to sound poignant, and playing a short rotation obviously means the minutes aren't properly distributed
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/10/2010  2:42 AM
the only issue i have is with some of the guys he's playing... playing Fishlips 35+ a night & scrubs like Bender for 17 puts us at a huge disadvantage every night scoring points... if the big 3 (Lee, Chandler & Gallo) are having an off night, then we gotta get good games out of Al & Nate, & both those guys are so hit or miss on a nightly basis.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
OldFan
Posts: 21456
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2003
Member: #446
1/10/2010  6:05 AM
Pharzeone wrote:
OldFan wrote:Unless our players are just out of shape they should not be wearing down. We're not playing at a fast pace and we have one player on the entire team that is in the top 30 in minutes played - David Lee at 29th is getting 36 minutes a game. Yet every game thread poster are lamenting the short rotation and how our players are being over used.

The only guy I worry about is Duhon and because he seemed tired at the end of last year. But he's averaging < 35 minutes a game.

But I don't see where MDA "short rotation" is adding up to a lot of minutes for any one guy so I don't get this fear.

Feel free to explain what I'm missing...

This is how I look at it. Starter vs. bench minutes. Al is the only other bench player other than Nate and Larry (which you have to factor in their miss games for DNP) with more than 16 minutes a night. They have like 5 guys averaging more than 30 minutes a game. 3 of those guys average ~ 35 minutes a game. There is a huge discrepancy with allotted of minutes vs. other teams particular playoff teams or those close to contention.

The Lakers have 3 guys averaging 35 or more minutes and 5 guys averaging 31 plus minutes.

Almost every team in the league has 2 or 3 guys and some teams have 4 guys averaging 34 or more minutes.

The Knicks player that plays the most minutes plays less then almost every other teams max minute player.

The argument that MDA is wearing down his team more then other coaches is not correct.

babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
1/10/2010  7:36 AM
TMS wrote:the only issue i have is with some of the guys he's playing... playing Fishlips 35+ a night & scrubs like Bender for 17 puts us at a huge disadvantage every night scoring points... if the big 3 (Lee, Chandler & Gallo) are having an off night, then we gotta get good games out of Al & Nate, & both those guys are so hit or miss on a nightly basis.

Now bender is a scrub?

Let's go Knicks. That's amare
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
1/10/2010  7:40 AM
I'm not worried, OldFan. They, the haters, like to attack MDA for anything at all because they have trouble accepting that he is a winning coach. In Phoenix the haters were angry that his run-and-gun style was winning games, so they said he runs players down. Doesn't coach defense.

This wearing down of players falls in the same category as 'doesn't coach defense', the bull**** category.

And from what I saw last night, if anyone should be worried about wearing down it's the Rockets because their intensity made the Knicks look like sheep, like lambs!

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/10/2010  8:35 AM
They are pro players. If they're not in shape to play full games then they need to retire. Mike should have inserted Hughes or Douglas... Hill or Darko... at some point when it was clear we were going down in flames. Why he didn't I don't know. It cost us the game. I don't think it was fatigue as much as us doing the same tired BS all game long while the Rockets adjusted and took us down.
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
1/10/2010  8:40 AM
Because we're 3-1 in January. No need to get all crazy. Knicks was in the game until the very end.
WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
1/10/2010  8:59 AM
orangeblobman wrote:Because we're 3-1 in January. No need to get all crazy. Knicks was in the game until the very end.

That is my only knock on MDA....too short of a rotation. Then sometimes at the end of the game, if players are tired or not performing, he doesn't have/put anyone else in. He basically uses a 7 man rotation.(Rockets game typical - the 8th player, Landry, played 3 min). When we do have other players sitting who are very qualified to play. Hughes for instance - could have played some of the first half and then been warmed up and fresh to play some min in 4th Qtr.

Lee - has been playing great. For the season, he may be avg only 35 min/game, but for the past month he has been playing over 40min/game. Last nite - 44 1/2 min. He lost a step at the end of the game.

The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
1/10/2010  9:43 AM
Markji wrote:That is my only knock on MDA....too short of a rotation. Then sometimes at the end of the game, if players are tired or not performing, he doesn't have/put anyone else in. He basically uses a 7 man rotation.(Rockets game typical - the 8th player, Landry, played 3 min). When we do have other players sitting who are very qualified to play. Hughes for instance - could have played some of the first half and then been warmed up and fresh to play some min in 4th Qtr.

Lee - has been playing great. For the season, he may be avg only 35 min/game, but for the past month he has been playing over 40min/game. Last nite - 44 1/2 min. He lost a step at the end of the game.

I'd say the 7 man rotation is not typical and if Al is healthy expands to an 8 man rotation, with the 9th guy getting spot minutes.

PURE KNICKS LOVE
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/10/2010  2:06 PM
babyKnicks wrote:Now bender is a scrub?

was he ever anything else? u telling me he's made a difference since he's been here?

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TheGame
Posts: 26647
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
1/10/2010  3:14 PM
Now that MDA is playing Nate again and with the minutes he is giving Bender, it is not as much as concern as it was 2-3 weeks ago. MDA needs to have a 9-man rotation to ensure he does not wear down Duhon and a few others.
Trust the Process
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/10/2010  3:21 PM
No one is gonna wear down with the schedule we've had. we've had a lot of off days and very few back to backs. MDA has ALWAYS had a short rotation and it's worked for him. He never lost cuz guys were tired in the Playoffs. He may have been beat, but it wasn't cuz guys were gassed. If you think about it. stars usually play big minutes and if you basically only play your best guys then they all end up with starters minutes and a few spot minutes from your reserves. There's nothing wrong with that, in fact I think it leads to better chemistry and consistent performances from night to night, qtr to qtr.

When this team gets even better talent you'll see even more benefits of the short rotation.

arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
1/10/2010  4:59 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/10/2010  5:03 PM
I think we are shot of quality players to have more that 8-man rotation.
When Al or Nate is out we are shorthanded.
I agree that JJ as good as defender he is should not play more that 20 min and should not shoot.
Rockets are very well coached and they execute. They forces JJ to try putting it in 9 times and he magically did it 2 times.
This was the difference between winning and losing this time.
Bender is not bringing anything in yet and Larry is a minus with his erratic offensive game.
Al and Nate are also very suspect as wining players. But we have what we have.
It is amazing that Mike can produce bbal of this quality having only 5 consistent players (all of them by the way with limitations - 2 being just role players and 3 still learning the game).
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
scoshin
Posts: 20584
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #568
1/10/2010  6:21 PM
The problem with Mike D's rotation lately is he relies too much on his starters. It's not just 35+ minutes. Some of our starters are playing 40+ each game for the past 2-3 weeks, with the exception of blowout wins.

A 7-man rotation is too short, especially when your bench players don't even break 30 minutes. Our starters are noticably gassed in the 4th quarter. We no longer make as many key rebounds or hustle plays, and our D breaks down too easily. We also end up relying on more iso play on offense as everyone stops moving off-the-ball. These are all signs of exhaustion.

Houston on the other hand had a 9-10 man rotation and had great minute distribution. It was clear that Landry and Lowry had more legs than any of our starters.

markvmc
Posts: 22004
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2008
Member: #1797

1/10/2010  6:51 PM
arkrud wrote:
I agree that JJ as good as defender he is should not play more that 20 min and should not shoot.
Rockets are very well coached and they execute. They forces JJ to try putting it in 9 times and he magically did it 2 times.
This was the difference between winning and losing this time.

Jeffries made 4 baskets, not 2.

arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
1/10/2010  7:50 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/10/2010  7:50 PM
markvmc wrote:
arkrud wrote:
I agree that JJ as good as defender he is should not play more that 20 min and should not shoot.
Rockets are very well coached and they execute. They forces JJ to try putting it in 9 times and he magically did it 2 times.
This was the difference between winning and losing this time.

Jeffries made 4 baskets, not 2.

You are right 4 of 10 and it was a miracle.
He should be 1 of 2. For player like him taking 10 shorts... yes we are shorthanded.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/16/2010  6:57 AM
Bump

Why did David Lee play all 48 last night?

I didn't watch the second half (or really much of the first half) against toronto, but were the Knicks every really in it? Down big at the start of the third, yea, it looks like a nice run was made, but they made no real ground up in the fourth quarter.

OK, maybe they made a decent 2nd half run.

But when we were getting smoked in the first quarter, why not sit Lee?

Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/16/2010  8:29 AM
franco12 wrote:Bump

Why did David Lee play all 48 last night?

I didn't watch the second half (or really much of the first half) against toronto, but were the Knicks every really in it? Down big at the start of the third, yea, it looks like a nice run was made, but they made no real ground up in the fourth quarter.

OK, maybe they made a decent 2nd half run.

But when we were getting smoked in the first quarter, why not sit Lee?

Chandler and Jeffries got in some serious early foul trouble. Chandler had 4 by halftime and 5th in the 3rd. Jeffries also got 4 and 5 in the third if I recall.

We really had no choice, except you know, maybe our lotto pick rookie rotting on the bench who may have come in for a few minutes. But Mike doesn't like to do that he wants to play the players that "give us the best chance to win".

Yeahhhhh.... so Lee played the full game.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Why is everyone worried about this team wearing down?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy