SupremeCommander wrote:I disagree with this completely. All Star weekend is about showcasing the talent that the fans wish to see in an exhibition game. It's not about assembling the best players. It's not about assembling the best team. All Star weekend is about showcasing what the collective fan wants to see. And the fan's selection rights extend only as far as the starters. After that, it's up to the coaches.I fail to see what's wrong with that. There are guys that fans want to see.
The original concept of any All-Star team was that the best and most deserving players would be picked to it. Giving the fans a say was just a marketing ploy.
When we argue about how much a player should be getting salary-wise, do we talk about his talent on the court, or that he is popular and was voted to the all star team?
Being on an All-Star team can mean for $$ for a player, and even though only the starters are selected by fans, a number of deserving players will miss out (Lee may be one this year) because a few guys were voted in as starters who did not belong on the team at all.
As I said earlier-let the players or coaches choose the real All-Stars, and then have 3 extra spots for fans favorite at G, F, & C.
No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee