Knixkik wrote:You sign D Lee as your PF of the future, not your center. The center position should belong to Hill longterm, so a nice veteran center can come in to split time with him. Ideally, the Knicks can sign Camby for a lucrative one-year deal and develop Hill behind him. Hopefully we can get Camby for 65-70 games next season at 20 mins a night. Hill can back him up for 20 mins per as well, then we can go small ball for the remaining minutes. Camby instantly brings veteran leadership and a defensive presence to the lineup that will help you win now, plus he's still good enough in transition to fit the offense temporarily.
Given their similar numbers, Haywood is 5 years younger and is still developing his offensive game. We could probably sign Haywood for 3 years 22-25M with a 4th year option. Camby might be a 1 year stop gap, but that's alot of cap space to spend on a temporary fix. Hill could be 2-3 years before he develops. I think the big question mark is Lee. I just think that as much as I like Lee, there are just better options for the PF and C positions. I think Gallo could eventually be a very good PF.
Going forward if we can sign Lebron, I think our areas of immediate need are still at the C and PG positions. Since the 2010 FA PG and draft class look thin we should address our needs at center and look to fill the PG spot in 2011 and look for an inexpensive stop gap like Sergio Rodriguez for 2010. A line-up of:
PG - Sergio
SG - Chandler
SF - Lebron
PF - Gallinari
C - Haywood
with a bench of:
Jeffries, Douglass, Hill and Bender could win some games. I still wouldn't mind us looking into trading Harrington for Tyrus Thomas either.