[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Boozer more than available as per ESPN....
Author Thread
joec32033
Posts: 30623
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
7/11/2009  7:07 PM
ESPN
The Portland Trail Blazers elected Friday not to wait on trade possibilities, deciding instead to offer Utah Jazz restricted free agent Paul Millsap a four-year contract worth $32 million, according to sources with knowledge of the Blazers' plans.

The Jazz, meanwhile, are expected to continue their push to trade Carlos Boozer in response, with the intent of creating sufficient distance from the luxury-tax line to enable Utah to match the Millsap offer.

The Blazers front-loaded the contract to make it difficult for Utah to match. They gave Millsap a $5.6 million signing bonus and agreed to pay him $4.7 million of his first-year, $6.3 million salary the day the contract becomes effective.

So a week from now, Millsap would receive $10.3 million. Add to that the $1.6 million that will be spread throughout next season and Millsap, who was paid just $797,581 last season, will be paid $11.9 million this year. The remaining $20.1 million will be spread over the final three years of the deal.

Those are the terms the Jazz will have to agree to if they match Portland's offer within the next seven days. With Utah already $4 million over the luxury tax, that will be tough to do.

Sources say that Boozer has been directly informed by the Jazz that he is no longer in the team's long-term plans, prompting Boozer to urge Utah to trade him. Chicago, New York, Miami and Detroit are believed to be the teams most interested in acquiring Boozer, who has only one year left on his contract worth $12.7 million after passing up the opportunity to become a free agent this summer.


The Blazers decided to go this route after a week of investigating their trade options following the collapse of their deal to sign Hedo Turkoglu away from Orlando.

One of those options, reported Thursday by ESPN.com, was a three-team trade involving Utah and the Chicago Bulls that would have landed Boozer in Chicago and Kirk Hinrich in Portland. But those trade talks stalled in part because the Bulls were not prepared to surrender Hinrich and Tyrus Thomas (who would have been Utah-bound) without getting back promising Portland guard Jerryd Bayless in return in addition to Boozer.

That three-team trade construction, sources said, was the byproduct of the increasingly hard push by the Jazz to move Boozer in an attempt to create the financial flexibility needed to keep Millsap, along with Portland's ongoing attempts to cash in on its nearly $8 million in available salary-cap space after Turkoglu made an 11th-hour switch to sign with the Toronto Raptors.

Although the Jazz and Blazers would appear to be unlikely trade partners, given their geographical and competitive proximity as Northwest Division rivals, Utah must recruit a trade partner that has significant salary-cap space to shed payroll in a Boozer deal. While Portland's salary-cap space is tied up in its Millsap offer, Oklahoma City is the only other team in the league that qualifies.

The Blazers, meanwhile, are still hoping to land a top-quality player this summer without surrendering any coveted assets, as evidenced by their unwillingness to part with Bayless in trade talks with the Bulls and Jazz. So they've elected to use their salary-cap space on Millsap knowing they'll be right back where they were in the event Utah matches -- trying to land Hinrich or a player of similar stature in a trade featuring three teams or more.


One source with knowledge of Portland's thinking said Friday that signing Millsap is a move to "spark Utah into action." The Blazers' apparent belief is that Utah's urgency to trade Boozer will increase because of the offer sheet.

And if the Jazz unexpectedly decline to match on Millsap, Portland would at worst come away with a quality player at a reasonable price that perhaps increases its options down the road. Millsap would come off the bench behind power forward LaMarcus Aldridge, though the Blazers believe Millsap also may be capable of playing small forward.

He would not, however, address the playmaking void Portland has been seeking to fill with Turkoglu or longtime Blazers target Hinrich.

Another source close to the process on Friday identified two main obstacles to the aforementioned three-way trade. Concerned about the quality of its backcourt rotation if it had to surrender Hinrich with Thomas after losing Ben Gordon in free agency, Chicago would insist that the Blazers surrender Bayless, which Portland does not want to do. It was believed that Chicago, if it couldn't get Bayless, was willing to substitute Tim Thomas for Tyrus Thomas in the deal, but sources say Utah would have almost certainly balked if Tyrus Thomas is not included.

For a time Wednesday, sources say Chicago was committed to participate in the four-team deal that ultimately sent Shawn Marion to Dallas, with Tim Thomas also headed for the Mavericks. One source with knowledge of the discussions said that the Bulls pulled Thomas out of that deal Wednesday night to plug him into another trade.




It is not inconceivable, after the Millsap holding pattern ends, that Utah could still wind up working with Portland on new three-team (or more) scenarios involving the Blazers, because the Blazers would again have cap space if Utah's matches on Millsap, making them an attractive trade partner in spite of any lingering tension.

The Knicks and the Heat would have interest in Boozer as much for his expiring contract as his All-Star resume, but neither team has the cap space in a direct deal with the Jazz to give them the payroll relief they're seeking.

The Pistons have been widely mentioned as a trade suitor for Boozer, but it remains to be seen if they will formally enter the bidding. Sources with knowledge of Detroit's thinking insisted again Friday that the Pistons were not interested in trading for Boozer, largely because they think Tayshaun Prince and the newly signed Charlie Villanueva will complement each other better than Boozer and Villanueva would, especially on defense. Yet it remains possible that Pistons' inability to sign Orlando-bound Brandon Bass will lead them to re-consider.

The revamped Pistons have no dependable low-post scorer and are seeking to add size to their front line, with Boozer's expiring contract -- as it would in Chicago, New York or Miami -- affording them the added bonus of potentially creating salary-cap space again next summer after Detroit had the most spending money in the league this summer.

When asked about the trade talks with the Blazers and Bulls and his general plans for Boozer, Jazz general manager Kevin O'Connor declined comment in Friday's editions of the Salt Lake Tribune.

Bulls general manager Gar Forman did not offer specifics when asked about the trade talks, but he likewise didn't deny Chicago's interest in Boozer, telling the Chicago Sun-Times: "There are always conversations going on, and we'll continue to talk to teams to see if we can make ourselves better."

When healthy, Boozer represents the elite low-post scorer that the Bulls have been chasing for years. But his arrival would also position them to have significant salary-cap space for the summer of 2010, thanks to Boozer's $12.7 million expiring contract, to court Chicago native Dwyane Wade or Chris Bosh in free agency.

Pritchard acknowledged Thursday afternoon in a session with local reporters that he was also weighing whether to extend an offer sheet to Millsap. He also addressed a report in Thursday's Oregonian newspaper that talks negotiations on contract extensions for franchise cornerstones Brandon Roy and Aldridge have stalled.

"It's amicable," he said. "We plan to make it amicable. More importantly, Brandon and LaMarcus will be here for a long time."

We would need to make it a 3 team deal because I don't think we have anything the Jazz want.
~You can't run from who you are.~
AUTOADVERT
babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
7/12/2009  11:04 AM
ESPN.com: Knicks Have Interest in Boozer
Jul 11th, 2009 by Jon.
ESPN.com’s Chris Broussard and Marc Stein are reporting today that the Utah Jazz intend to match Portland’s offer to Paul Millsap but, to do so, must first offload Carlos Boozer and the $12.6 million he’s due next season. No surprise there.

What is a little bit surprising, though, is that Broussard and Stein (doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue like Woodward and Bernstein) are also reporting that the Knicks are among the teams that have interest in acquiring Boozer.

Boozer is an expiring deal so trading for him certainly makes sense from the Mission-2010 perspective but it would also give the Knicks ownership of the bird rights of one of the elite 2010 free agents. It’s not clear that Boozer would be a perfect fit in SSOL but, since the commitment would only be for a year, the Knicks would basically be getting a free look without a whole lot of risk.

The problem is that, since Utah’s greatest need in any Boozer trade is to free up cap space to re-sign Millsap, the Knicks don’t have a whole lot to offer them straight up. Any trade would have to be a three team deal (at least). I think I might have a solution, though.

While the Blazers decided to extend an offer to Millsap, they’ve also shown a lot of past interest in David Lee. Here’s what I propose: First, Utah matches Millsap. Then, the Knicks, Blazers and Jazz execute a three way deal whereby the Blazers acquire a signed-and-traded Lee (and another small contract to make the money work), the Knicks get Boozer and the Jazz get Travis Outlaw and a big, fat trade exception. In fact, if the Knicks also offered Jordan Hill or Wilson Chandler to the Jazz in this deal perhaps they can reacquire their 2010 first round pick. I’m pretty sure (85-90%) that this works under the cap.

UPDATE: I now realize that this trade fails to take into consideration that Lee would become a BYC player after signing the contract. To my understanding, that means that his deal has to be slashed in half when calculating the cap consequences in a trade. So he’d have to be paired with another contract going back to Portland to make it work under the cap. I think Lee and Cuttino Mobley’s deal might get it done.

Thoughts?
Let's go Knicks. That's amare
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
7/12/2009  11:11 AM
Posted by babyKnicks:



While the Blazers decided to extend an offer to Millsap, they’ve also shown a lot of past interest in David Lee. Here’s what I propose: First, Utah matches Millsap. Then, the Knicks, Blazers and Jazz execute a three way deal whereby the Blazers acquire a signed-and-traded Lee (and another small contract to make the money work), the Knicks get Boozer and the Jazz get Travis Outlaw and a big, fat trade exception.

like others have said previously, getting Boozer would be a great move and if this is the parameters of the trade that lands him here that would be awesome.
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
30andOverClub
Posts: 20108
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2005
Member: #876
7/12/2009  11:25 AM
Posted by McK1:
Posted by babyKnicks:



While the Blazers decided to extend an offer to Millsap, they’ve also shown a lot of past interest in David Lee. Here’s what I propose: First, Utah matches Millsap. Then, the Knicks, Blazers and Jazz execute a three way deal whereby the Blazers acquire a signed-and-traded Lee (and another small contract to make the money work), the Knicks get Boozer and the Jazz get Travis Outlaw and a big, fat trade exception.

like others have said previously, getting Boozer would be a great move and if this is the parameters of the trade that lands him here that would be awesome.

I doubt Boozer would be anything more than a 1 year rental. Why trade Lee for something that's not going to help us in 2010? I like BRIGG's idea of giving them Mobley's contract plus a non-guaranteed contract to make the numbers work for Boozer. They save $3MM on salary, $3MM in luxury tax, $7.6MM in the insurance payments, and we can even throw in up to $3MM for the trade. That saves them up to $15.6MM this year, making it very easy for them to retain Millsap.
JayNYC
Posts: 20732
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/7/2004
Member: #682
USA
7/12/2009  11:28 AM
I'd sign off ASAP... and deal w/ the prospect of Carlos Boozer going elsewhere at seasons end. This is the exact type of deal we should be thinking of... Gain an allstar caliber talent headed towards free agency, RETAIN THE BIRD RIGHTS.. thats huge. Getting a pick back, especially a 1st RD Pick would be icing on the cake. It also gives us added insurance should we potentially lose him.. Thats the risk w/ trading for Boozer, he is committed to himself only! I'd hate to see Wilson go... but would be compelled to keep Hill, as a plan B instead!
Inhale deep like the words of my breath/ I never sleep, cause sleep is the cousin of death-- Circa 1994 Nasty Nas: NY State of Mind
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/12/2009  11:30 AM
Have Boozer and Lebron made up? If not, getting Boozer basically tells Lebron to stay away.
kingofelpaso
Posts: 20270
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/3/2009
Member: #2542

7/12/2009  11:33 AM
Im not a Boozer fan. No thanks. He dosnt fit into this system and is not worth giving up something of value for a one year rental
markvmc
Posts: 22004
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2008
Member: #1797

7/12/2009  11:37 AM
Posted by babyKnicks:

ESPN.com: Knicks Have Interest in Boozer
Jul 11th, 2009 by Jon.

it would also give the Knicks ownership of the bird rights of one of the elite 2010 free agents.

Ummm....no...

McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
7/12/2009  11:47 AM
Posted by 30andOverClub:
Posted by McK1:
Posted by babyKnicks:



While the Blazers decided to extend an offer to Millsap, they’ve also shown a lot of past interest in David Lee. Here’s what I propose: First, Utah matches Millsap. Then, the Knicks, Blazers and Jazz execute a three way deal whereby the Blazers acquire a signed-and-traded Lee (and another small contract to make the money work), the Knicks get Boozer and the Jazz get Travis Outlaw and a big, fat trade exception.

like others have said previously, getting Boozer would be a great move and if this is the parameters of the trade that lands him here that would be awesome.

I doubt Boozer would be anything more than a 1 year rental. Why trade Lee for something that's not going to help us in 2010? I like BRIGG's idea of giving them Mobley's contract plus a non-guaranteed contract to make the numbers work for Boozer. They save $3MM on salary, $3MM in luxury tax, $7.6MM in the insurance payments, and we can even throw in up to $3MM for the trade. That saves them up to $15.6MM this year, making it very easy for them to retain Millsap.

the injury history is a red flag but other than that why wouldn't Boozer help in 2010 and beyond?

he is an all-star pf in his late 20's. He is a proven post scorer and one of the top rebounders in the league. He gives you everything Lee gives you on offense. He can't handle the ball like Lee but his mid-range jumper is much better.


the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
30andOverClub
Posts: 20108
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2005
Member: #876
7/12/2009  11:55 AM
Posted by McK1:
Posted by 30andOverClub:
Posted by McK1:
Posted by babyKnicks:



While the Blazers decided to extend an offer to Millsap, they’ve also shown a lot of past interest in David Lee. Here’s what I propose: First, Utah matches Millsap. Then, the Knicks, Blazers and Jazz execute a three way deal whereby the Blazers acquire a signed-and-traded Lee (and another small contract to make the money work), the Knicks get Boozer and the Jazz get Travis Outlaw and a big, fat trade exception.

like others have said previously, getting Boozer would be a great move and if this is the parameters of the trade that lands him here that would be awesome.

I doubt Boozer would be anything more than a 1 year rental. Why trade Lee for something that's not going to help us in 2010? I like BRIGG's idea of giving them Mobley's contract plus a non-guaranteed contract to make the numbers work for Boozer. They save $3MM on salary, $3MM in luxury tax, $7.6MM in the insurance payments, and we can even throw in up to $3MM for the trade. That saves them up to $15.6MM this year, making it very easy for them to retain Millsap.

the injury history is a red flag but other than that why wouldn't Boozer help in 2010 and beyond?

he is an all-star pf in his late 20's. He is a proven post scorer and one of the top rebounders in the league. He gives you everything Lee gives you on offense. He can't handle the ball like Lee but his mid-range jumper is much better.

Well, not sure he fits the system. Like you said, some injury history. Might ask for too much money than is reasonable. And like Bonn said, doesn't LeBron hate him, ha! (Yeah I'm still holding out for the LeBron dream.)

I wouldn't mind it too much, but as I'm not sure that he'd be the kind of guy Mike and Donnie would sign to a huge contract extension, and because Utah would be desperate (assuming they really want to keep Millsap), I wouldn't want to give up such a nice trading chip as Lee for Boozer.

However, having his bird rights might mean that, if we don't want him past 2010, we still might be able to flip him for Bosh or Amare in a double sign and trade or something like that.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30223
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
7/12/2009  11:58 AM
We have Mobley's 9.5mil contract that they would save 7.5mil on. Plus we have a 2mil trade exception right? The would save 10mil.

Utah is going to want a prospect back as well though. I doubt they would trade Boozer only for cap space.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
7/12/2009  12:11 PM
Article makes no sense. Only other team we can get to absorb salary is either Portland (if the offer is matched) or Oklahoma City. I don't think we are getting Boozer.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/12/2009  12:13 PM
.

---->Utah is going to want a prospect back as well though.

yeah and his name is Millsap.
RIP Crushalot😞
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
7/12/2009  12:14 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:

We have Mobley's 9.5mil contract that they would save 7.5mil on. Plus we have a 2mil trade exception right? The would save 10mil.

Utah is going to want a prospect back as well though. I doubt they would trade Boozer only for cap space.

you can't combine them
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
7/12/2009  1:27 PM
I doubt Utah trades Boozer away for cap space either but if that is the only way they can keep Millsap, perhaps they get a little desperate. I really don't think they want to let Millsap walk away after basically telling Boozer he is not in their future plans.

They have to find a way to trade Boozer and I'm sure they will find a taker. Too bad we don't have an extra first rounder or something of small value that could be added to sweeten the deal.
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
7/12/2009  4:58 PM
it's funny b/c if the knicks trade for boozer, there's a high chance he would be re-signed, yet nobody wants to commit to david lee long term.
joec32033
Posts: 30623
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
7/12/2009  4:59 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

it's funny b/c if the knicks trade for boozer, there's a high chance he would be re-signed, yet nobody wants to commit to david lee long term.

Actually if the Knicks can acquire Boozer the Jazz can let Millsap go or work out a sign and trade for a guy like Outlaw with Portland while we use Lee in a package for Boozer...
~You can't run from who you are.~
JayNYC
Posts: 20732
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/7/2004
Member: #682
USA
7/12/2009  5:32 PM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by djsunyc:

it's funny b/c if the knicks trade for boozer, there's a high chance he would be re-signed, yet nobody wants to commit to david lee long term.

Actually if the Knicks can acquire Boozer the Jazz can let Millsap go or work out a sign and trade for a guy like Outlaw with Portland while we use Lee in a package for Boozer...

Or the possibilities of a 3 way deal can be explored:

A re-signed David Lee goes to Portland

Travis Outlaw/ Cuttino Mobley (expiring) and a filler to Utah
They match Portlands offer to Millsap

NYK gets Boozer

Inhale deep like the words of my breath/ I never sleep, cause sleep is the cousin of death-- Circa 1994 Nasty Nas: NY State of Mind
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/12/2009  5:35 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

it's funny b/c if the knicks trade for boozer, there's a high chance he would be re-signed, yet nobody wants to commit to david lee long term.
I don't want to commit to either but Boozer is definitely better than David Lee. I don't see Lee ever averaging 21 and 12 on a 50 win team.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
7/12/2009  6:34 PM
Is there anyone named "Stoner" available? I want that guy on my team.

[Edited by - basketballjones on 07-12-2009 18:34]
https:// It's not so hard.
Boozer more than available as per ESPN....

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy