[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

what is Lee's value around the league
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/12/2009  12:04 PM
as a starter in 44 games 17 points 12.5 rebs and 57% FGs 37 minutes a game, 25 years old and an RFA so you control his destiny

Whats that worth? I would think a top 3 pick or bigtime prospect coming back.

He is 3rd in rebounding
He is 4th in FG% and that huge when your scoring 17 a game
At 43rd in the league he is a legit point producer as well (somehow 'scorer' doesnt sound right)

What is a good trade?
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
AUTOADVERT
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/12/2009  12:06 PM
i would trade him for yo mama...
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
2/12/2009  12:07 PM
I've been going back and forth with TMS for a minute on this topic, but yeah a top 3 pick or a player like Aldridge is the only thing I'm going to take seriously at this point.

Just look at those numbers.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
2/12/2009  12:11 PM
Devils Advocate- and I would even go with our record- but if he is such a good rebounder & third in the league, why is our team differential as high as it is?

If he is a good rebounder, either our differential shouldn't be as high, or he should be grabbing more boards.

Someone like a Dennis Rodman would be grabbing about 25 boards a game on this roster.
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/12/2009  12:11 PM
Lee cant hold a candle to my momma
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
2/12/2009  12:12 PM
Posted by fishmike:

Lee cant hold a candle to my momma

ummm . . . do you realize what you've just said??
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
2/12/2009  12:13 PM
Posted by Marv:
Posted by fishmike:

Lee cant hold a candle to my momma

ummm . . . do you realize what you've just said??

hahaha
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
martin
Posts: 79931
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/12/2009  12:18 PM
Posted by franco12:

Devils Advocate- and I would even go with our record- but if he is such a good rebounder & third in the league, why is our team differential as high as it is?

If he is a good rebounder, either our differential shouldn't be as high, or he should be grabbing more boards.

Someone like a Dennis Rodman would be grabbing about 25 boards a game on this roster.

If Lee was playing PF and we had a C who could grab some rebounds, I think the story would be different. As it is, Jefferies guards a lot of perimeter players, Al is a wuss and TT is kinda in the same boat. It's the construction of the team.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
2/12/2009  12:19 PM
Top 3 pick value or top prospect. Anything less would be very dissapointing.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
TheGame
Posts: 26651
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
2/12/2009  12:40 PM
If we got Portland to pony up Bayless, Frye, and a top-10 protected first round pick, I would go home with that and be happy. I think Seattle and Memphis are the only teams that might consider giving us their top-5 pick because they need a PF. A deal of Wilcox and Seattle's Pick (which should be no worse than 5) would be another solid deal.
Trust the Process
martin
Posts: 79931
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/12/2009  12:52 PM
Posted by TheGame:

If we got Portland to pony up Bayless, Frye, and a top-10 protected first round pick, I would go home with that and be happy.

why do folks always want Frye back in any deal with POR? the dude sucks. And I don't really fall for the "he would fit in the big-man shooting for MDA's system" reason: if he could hit the outside shot and play reasonably well in all the other facets of the game, he would be playing, and yet he is not.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
TheGame
Posts: 26651
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
2/12/2009  12:56 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by TheGame:

If we got Portland to pony up Bayless, Frye, and a top-10 protected first round pick, I would go home with that and be happy.

why do folks always want Frye back in any deal with POR? the dude sucks. And I don't really fall for the "he would fit in the big-man shooting for MDA's system" reason: if he could hit the outside shot and play reasonably well in all the other facets of the game, he would be playing, and yet he is not.


Martin, it is all about perspective. When you compare Frye to our present big men of Curry and Jeffries, then Frye starts to look a whole lot better. Jeffries cannot hit an open shot and Curry cannot stay in shape. Getting Frye as a filler would at least give us a competent back up. Frye is really only filler in the deal. The real issue is getting Bayless (who I think can be a taller version of Nate with better defense potential and allow us to trade Nate next week for another asset) and a 1st round pick.


[Edited by - thegame on 12-02-2009 12:56]

[Edited by - thegame on 12-02-2009 12:57]
Trust the Process
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/12/2009  1:04 PM
i think young players on par with lee's value are charlie v and possibly rudy gay...
martin
Posts: 79931
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/12/2009  1:07 PM
Posted by TheGame:
Posted by martin:
Posted by TheGame:

If we got Portland to pony up Bayless, Frye, and a top-10 protected first round pick, I would go home with that and be happy.

why do folks always want Frye back in any deal with POR? the dude sucks. And I don't really fall for the "he would fit in the big-man shooting for MDA's system" reason: if he could hit the outside shot and play reasonably well in all the other facets of the game, he would be playing, and yet he is not.


Martin, it is all about perspective. When you compare Frye to our present big men of Curry and Jeffries, then Frye starts to look a whole lot better. Jeffries cannot hit an open shot and Curry cannot stay in shape. Getting Frye as a filler would at least give us a competent back up. Frye is really only filler in the deal. The real issue is getting Bayless (who I think can be a taller version of Nate with better defense potential and allow us to trade Nate next week for another asset) and a 1st round pick.


[Edited by - thegame on 12-02-2009 12:56]

[Edited by - thegame on 12-02-2009 12:57]

if it's filler, demand Outlaw or Marshall.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
2/12/2009  1:39 PM
Posted by Marv:
Posted by fishmike:

Lee cant hold a candle to my momma

ummm . . . do you realize what you've just said??

Sometimes a candle is just a candle.
https:// It's not so hard.
TheGame
Posts: 26651
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
2/12/2009  2:03 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

i think young players on par with lee's value are charlie v and possibly rudy gay...

I think Lee's value is above Charlie V and below Rudy Gay.
Trust the Process
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
2/12/2009  2:41 PM
We need an attacking player more than anything. If you could get Gay and a pick, that would be nice.



Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
2/12/2009  2:42 PM
Would you trade Lee/Gallo for Larmcus Aldridge?
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
2/12/2009  2:44 PM
I wouldn't give up both of those guys for LA.

Lee for Alridge, I would defintely do though.
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
2/12/2009  2:50 PM
How about Lee and pick for LA?
Gallo/Nate for Anthony Randolf

Aldridge-C
Chandler-SG
Randolf-SF
Duhon-PG

That's a pretty good core with room to sign more free agents in 2010.
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
what is Lee's value around the league
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy