[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

How many coaches must take a bullet for these players?
Author Thread
Uptown
Posts: 31370
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

1/6/2009  11:19 PM
I posted this in the gamethread but decided to ask this question here.

When the team loses, the coach has to take some responsibility, I understand that. But I dont understand people ripping on the current coach, when the previous coach, and the one before that and the one before that couldn't squeeze much life, consistantcy, or wins out of essentially the same group of back-ups and bench players.

Seriously, who has a better starting 5, Oklahoma or the Knicks?


AUTOADVERT
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
1/6/2009  11:24 PM
I agree. D'Antoni is passionate about this team being at least' a little more successful, a little more consistent. With this bunch, it's totally unpredictable. We can't rely on anything they do. It's pretty obvious beating bastan and then losing to OKC.

There is seriously something mentally wrong with our foundation. What that is exactly I cannot put my finger on. I'm beginning to think the same things would happen, even if we had Lebron! Maybe there's just too much to look forward to and maybe it's just too overwhelming. Now that's being 'out there'.
I'll never trust this' team again.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
1/6/2009  11:27 PM
This would hold true but this coach brought in the current point guard and now the number one option apparently on the team. At some point you got to put away that Scott Layden excuse used by Isiah particularly after David Lee is traded. This ain't the same roster from last year. Accountability also can't be blind.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
1/6/2009  11:31 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:

This would hold true but this coach brought in the current point guard and now the number one option apparently on the team. At some point you got to put away that Scott Layden excuse used by Isiah particularly after David Lee is traded. This ain't the same roster from last year. Accountability also can't be blind.

And D'Antoni has not made the excuse either. But damn man' at what point do we say we are in fact depleted with quality players and who is' backing up Duhon? Nobody!
I'll never trust this' team again.
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
1/6/2009  11:31 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:

This would hold true but this coach brought in the current point guard and now the number one option apparently on the team. At some point you got to put away that Scott Layden excuse used by Isiah particularly after David Lee is traded. This ain't the same roster from last year. Accountability also can't be blind.

Huh? Forget about Fred Jones and Randolph Morris. Besides Randolph and Crawford, 2 guys we knew were nothing special in terms of adding wins to this team, this is the same exact team. Same team. Except Duhon is starting over Marbury. Yay.

This is Isiah's team until the majority of his players are cleared off the team and replaced with players who have a high basketball IQ and attempt to play defense.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
1/6/2009  11:32 PM
Posted by 4949:
Posted by Pharzeone:

This would hold true but this coach brought in the current point guard and now the number one option apparently on the team. At some point you got to put away that Scott Layden excuse used by Isiah particularly after David Lee is traded. This ain't the same roster from last year. Accountability also can't be blind.

And D'Antoni has not made the excuse either. But damn man' at what point do we say we are in fact depleted with quality players and who is' backing up Duhon? Nobody!

Marbury DNP Coach's Decision
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
1/6/2009  11:36 PM
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by Pharzeone:

This would hold true but this coach brought in the current point guard and now the number one option apparently on the team. At some point you got to put away that Scott Layden excuse used by Isiah particularly after David Lee is traded. This ain't the same roster from last year. Accountability also can't be blind.

Huh? Forget about Fred Jones and Randolph Morris. Besides Randolph and Crawford, 2 guys we knew were nothing special in terms of adding wins to this team, this is the same exact team. Same team. Except Duhon is starting over Marbury. Yay.

This is Isiah's team until the majority of his players are cleared off the team and replaced with players who have a high basketball IQ and attempt to play defense.

Duhon and Harrington are averaging 39 and 36 minutes a game. Both men preceeded to use a roster spot in the off season to acquire a guy that the coach refuses to give any playing time too. This is Walsh and D'Antoni's team. It's the Scott Layden excuse all over again. To only make it look better Tim Thomas was acquired again to prove it.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
1/6/2009  11:42 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by Pharzeone:

This would hold true but this coach brought in the current point guard and now the number one option apparently on the team. At some point you got to put away that Scott Layden excuse used by Isiah particularly after David Lee is traded. This ain't the same roster from last year. Accountability also can't be blind.

Huh? Forget about Fred Jones and Randolph Morris. Besides Randolph and Crawford, 2 guys we knew were nothing special in terms of adding wins to this team, this is the same exact team. Same team. Except Duhon is starting over Marbury. Yay.

This is Isiah's team until the majority of his players are cleared off the team and replaced with players who have a high basketball IQ and attempt to play defense.

Duhon and Harrington are averaging 39 and 36 minutes a game. Both men preceeded to use a roster spot in the off season to acquire a guy that the coach refuses to give any playing time too. This is Walsh and D'Antoni's team. It's the Scott Layden excuse all over again. To only make it look better Tim Thomas was acquired again to prove it.

Yes. Tim Thomas was acquired for his amazing talent and for no other reason. Thanks for reminding me again.

Harrington is basically Crawford at forward with a shorter deal so I don't get your point. Duhon is a solid player, probably best fit to be a backup PG in this league. So what is your argument? You'd rather see Marbury play over Duhon? 5 of Isiah's players are part of the 8 man rotation. A 6th (Curry) will join it soon. Malik, Jerome, and Marbury are Isiah's players. Roberson? He makes the minimum...so who cares? I'm not understanding your problem with this team. Do you want to get under the cap? Do you support last year's team? I really don't get it and I will quit trying to.

Man, you are worse than isles. I wont even bother engaging you anymore.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
1/6/2009  11:45 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by 4949:
Posted by Pharzeone:

This would hold true but this coach brought in the current point guard and now the number one option apparently on the team. At some point you got to put away that Scott Layden excuse used by Isiah particularly after David Lee is traded. This ain't the same roster from last year. Accountability also can't be blind.

And D'Antoni has not made the excuse either. But damn man' at what point do we say we are in fact depleted with quality players and who is' backing up Duhon? Nobody!

Marbury DNP Coach's Decision

It's so easy to second guess our selves. I'm starting to wonder if D should have just played Marbury, and live with the mental case for one season. At least we'd have to points. When D praised Marbury, I was enlightened and then when he stabbed him in the back, I thought it would lead to his dismissle eventually, but he's still here.

I just don't know what to say anymore. We would have been screwed with him playing and we're still screwed anyway for banishing him. And Mobley? No one knew he'd go down with a bad heart.

This is all small talk. It's not like these guys even matter. I think we're all just going around in circles, making ourselves dizzy with anger and confussion.
I'll never trust this' team again.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
1/6/2009  11:50 PM
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by Pharzeone:

This would hold true but this coach brought in the current point guard and now the number one option apparently on the team. At some point you got to put away that Scott Layden excuse used by Isiah particularly after David Lee is traded. This ain't the same roster from last year. Accountability also can't be blind.

Huh? Forget about Fred Jones and Randolph Morris. Besides Randolph and Crawford, 2 guys we knew were nothing special in terms of adding wins to this team, this is the same exact team. Same team. Except Duhon is starting over Marbury. Yay.

This is Isiah's team until the majority of his players are cleared off the team and replaced with players who have a high basketball IQ and attempt to play defense.

Duhon and Harrington are averaging 39 and 36 minutes a game. Both men preceeded to use a roster spot in the off season to acquire a guy that the coach refuses to give any playing time too. This is Walsh and D'Antoni's team. It's the Scott Layden excuse all over again. To only make it look better Tim Thomas was acquired again to prove it.

Yes. Tim Thomas was acquired for his amazing talent and for no other reason. Thanks for reminding me again.

Harrington is basically Crawford at forward with a shorter deal so I don't get your point. Duhon is a solid player, probably best fit to be a backup PG in this league. So what is your argument? You'd rather see Marbury play over Duhon? 5 of Isiah's players are part of the 8 man rotation. A 6th (Curry) will join it soon. Malik, Jerome, and Marbury are Isiah's players. Roberson? He makes the minimum...so who cares? I'm not understanding your problem with this team. Do you want to get under the cap? Do you support last year's team? I really don't get it and I will quit trying to.

Man, you are worse than isles. I wont even bother engaging you anymore.

I don't engage you. I only responded out of curiosity as it was the third time you responded to a post I made and I didn't respond to those. I normally use the ignore button.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
1/7/2009  12:01 AM
Nice retort. Clearly you have no response. No explanation...as usual.

Third time I responded to a post you made? Glad you keep track because I certainly don't.

It feels good though. Ignoring each other. I guess it was meant to be. Awesome!
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
1/7/2009  12:10 AM
Children, children. Must we fight?!
I'll never trust this' team again.
Uptown
Posts: 31370
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

1/7/2009  8:51 AM
Phar.....Whether you want to call them Isiahs players, Laydens or Walsh's bottom line is these are role players and back ups at best. But to call this team Walsh and D'anotni's players is absurd. By looking at the contracts of the players brougnt in, its obvious that WalshToni is not committed to any of them. Not to mention, Walsh has only had the job for 5-6 months. Hardly enough time to shape a team in your image.

The only player I would call a WalshToni player is Galinari because thats who they picked. I'll even through in Duhon, even though the commitment is only for 2 years.

But the rest:

Jeffries
Q
Curry
Chandler
Nate
Lee
Malik
Jerome
are all residue from the last regime.


I would take Oklahomas starting 5 over ours in a heartbeat.

djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
1/7/2009  9:50 AM
Posted by Uptown:

I would take Oklahomas starting 5 over ours in a heartbeat.

westbrook + green + durant = none lower than the 5th pick in the lotto.

knicks lone lotto pick is wearing a girdle.

Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
1/7/2009  12:33 PM
D'Antoni's team? Walsh's team? Some of us still haven't come to grips with the fact that we are only 33 games into a long rebuilding process. We are in the process of cleaning out a roster made of overpaid role players. Nobody is winning with this team. How many coaches do we have to go through before we realize it ain't the coach, it's the players? It's amazing how we never learn. We have what 4 guys signed for 2010 and yet we are calling this D'antoni/Walsh's team? Our impatience is amazing.
I just hope that people will like me
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34071
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

1/7/2009  12:39 PM
Posted by 4949:

Children, children. Must we fight?!

As long as it's a trend, maybe we should engage in Round Two?
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Uptown
Posts: 31370
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

1/7/2009  2:24 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

D'Antoni's team? Walsh's team? Some of us still haven't come to grips with the fact that we are only 33 games into a long rebuilding process. We are in the process of cleaning out a roster made of overpaid role players. Nobody is winning with this team. How many coaches do we have to go through before we realize it ain't the coach, it's the players? It's amazing how we never learn. We have what 4 guys signed for 2010 and yet we are calling this D'antoni/Walsh's team? Our impatience is amazing.

Exactly...Now I see why the Isiah's of the worl get the impression that its impossible to rebuild in NY due to the impatience of our fans.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
1/7/2009  2:45 PM
People tend to think that they are the center of the Universe and this is natural.
Fans think that the team is here for US. It's a valid point... to some extent.
But fans also think that team must be constructed like we want and this should be done now. Is this a valid point?
All that new management done and said can be summarized in short: THIS TEAM WILL BE RECONSTRUCTED COMPLITELY.
We do not have any... and I mean any players that are worth talking about as keepers.
I like Lee, Chan, Duhon... but are they our players of the future? They never proved it yet.
Look at any good team in NBA - all of them have core group, the face of the team. Stars, role players, specialists.
You call the name of the player and you visualize the team; you think about the team and players are popping out.
Who do you think about when Knicks name is coming up - Frazer, Patrick, Huston, even Steph...?
Our current players are not the team yet and very few will be the part on the Knick in the future.




"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
1/7/2009  2:50 PM
I think we (collectively) just have a short attention span. We knew what the plan was, but as soon as the team wins a game we start thinking about a winning season.

In the past, if there ever was a plan to rebuild, the Knicks never stuck to it, so you can hardly blame fans for thinking they won't stick to it this time. And if they call for the coach to be fired, you can't blame them for thinking it'll happen because it seems to have worked before.



[Edited by - basketballjones on 01-07-2009 14:50]
https:// It's not so hard.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
1/7/2009  2:55 PM
Posted by BasketballJones:

I think we (collectively) just have a short attention span. We knew what the plan was, but as soon as the team wins a game we start thinking about a winning season.

In the past, if there ever was a plan to rebuild, the Knicks never stuck to it, so you can hardly blame fans for thinking they won't stick to it this time. And if they call for the coach to be fired, you can't blame them for thinking it'll happen because it seems to have worked before.



[Edited by - basketballjones on 01-07-2009 14:50]

Very true.
And if somebody want to win now and a lot he/she must switch to rooting for Boston or Lakers, or both for that matter. It will be a lot of positive amotions...

[Edited by - arkrud on 01-07-2009 2:55 PM]
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
How many coaches must take a bullet for these players?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy