[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

How you would rank our players in a sense of the value for the team?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
12/30/2008  9:59 AM
1. Lee
2. Duhon
3. Nate
4. Chan
5. DG ???
6. AL ???
Junk and temps are not included.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
AUTOADVERT
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
12/30/2008  10:05 AM
0. Lee
0. Duhon
0. Nate
0. Chan
0. DG ???
0. AL ???

They're all temps. I think the whole roster gets overhauled over the next few years.
https:// It's not so hard.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
12/30/2008  10:16 AM
"If there's a hell below, they ALL gotta go" - Curtis Mayfield

arkrud - brother basketballjones has it nailed. There is no such thing as "sense of value"

Center - HUGE tbd. first priority. job description: would settle for Jack Sikma clone

Enforcer Forward - tbd. job description: Rasheed Wallace skill-set with Charles Oakley's quotes

Skill Forward - tbd, job description: a Lamar Odom/Ron Artest homeboy-type

Assistant Guard - The Mayor. Vote early and often. 6'8 240 lb Change You Can Believe In

Swing G/F - Gallinari, maybe.. just maybe...

Lead Guard - Duhon. until further notice. Too many other weak spots to solve.

(Lee is a sixth man on a deep playoff team)

2012 will look nothing like today. That is of course, if the levee don't break.

[Edited by - misterearl on 12-30-2008 10:21 AM]
once a knick always a knick
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
12/30/2008  10:34 AM
1 - Nate
2 - Chandler
3 - Lee

the rest are all pretty much not worth ranking
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
12/30/2008  10:39 AM
Posted by misterearl:

"If there's a hell below, they ALL gotta go" - Curtis Mayfield

arkrud - brother basketballjones has it nailed. There is no such thing as "sense of value"

Center - HUGE tbd. first priority. job description: would settle for Jack Sikma clone

Enforcer Forward - tbd. job description: Rasheed Wallace skill-set with Charles Oakley's quotes

Skill Forward - tbd, job description: a Lamar Odom/Ron Artest homeboy-type

Assistant Guard - The Mayor. Vote early and often. 6'8 240 lb Change You Can Believe In

Swing G/F - Gallinari, maybe.. just maybe...

Lead Guard - Duhon. until further notice. Too many other weak spots to solve.

(Lee is a sixth man on a deep playoff team)

2012 will look nothing like today. That is of course, if the levee don't break.

[Edited by - misterearl on 12-30-2008 10:21 AM]

So currently we have 2 prospects (Chan, galo) and 3 solid backups (Lee, Duhon, Nate)
Is it anaizing that this team can win some games? Or is NBA so bad overal?



"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Elite
Posts: 26372
Alba Posts: 23
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510
12/30/2008  10:51 AM
if your bench was Lee, Duhan and Nate... that is a championship bench... unfortunately we have them all starting lol
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
12/30/2008  11:04 AM
Eite - exactly

Nowhere did I list Nate on my seven however

and I like Nate.

"if there's a hell below..."
once a knick always a knick
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
12/30/2008  11:20 AM
Value to the team in the sense of, if you took this guy away, would we even be competetive? Or in terms of trade value. I took the question to mean the first.

If that is the case

No.1 by far is Duhon. Without Duhon this team would fall flat on its face and lose by 25 every game.

Next is probably Harrington cause he provides the most verstaile scoring option the team has.

Third would be Lee, without which there is practically no rebounding. He's also our most important finisher inside.

Fourth is Chandler- his verstaility and defense on the perimeter is kee.

The rest kind slot in. IF there were a guy who could really shot it, he'd be next. What you have remaining is variable scoring. Nate is the best player out of the group, but I think we showed we can win some games without Nate. His loss hurt us more in the sense that we didn't have any backup guards more than we missed his play specifically I think.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/30/2008  7:15 PM
1 - Duhon
2 - Lee
3 - Nate
4 - Harrington
5 - Chandler

can't even put Gallo in there yet til we see him play & see what he's got.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
12/30/2008  10:05 PM
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by misterearl:

"If there's a hell below, they ALL gotta go" - Curtis Mayfield

arkrud - brother basketballjones has it nailed. There is no such thing as "sense of value"

Center - HUGE tbd. first priority. job description: would settle for Jack Sikma clone

Enforcer Forward - tbd. job description: Rasheed Wallace skill-set with Charles Oakley's quotes

Skill Forward - tbd, job description: a Lamar Odom/Ron Artest homeboy-type

Assistant Guard - The Mayor. Vote early and often. 6'8 240 lb Change You Can Believe In

Swing G/F - Gallinari, maybe.. just maybe...

Lead Guard - Duhon. until further notice. Too many other weak spots to solve.

(Lee is a sixth man on a deep playoff team)

2012 will look nothing like today. That is of course, if the levee don't break.

[Edited by - misterearl on 12-30-2008 10:21 AM]

So currently we have 2 prospects (Chan, galo) and 3 solid backups (Lee, Duhon, Nate)
Is it anaizing that this team can win some games? Or is NBA so bad overal?

When we have only six players (Nate, Lee, Chandler, Duhon, Al and Galo) worth talking about then yes' it is amazing! Now imagine adding two to three stars to this team in 2010? These six will already be seasoned.
I'll never trust this' team again.
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
12/30/2008  10:49 PM
Newsflash: we will not have Lee, Nate, Al, or Duhon in 2010 unless something changes.
Its a terrible realization I've come to based on cap rules.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
12/30/2008  11:11 PM
I think David Lee and Nate are probably a tie......I'd like to keep both.....the rest of the team probably could go. Al Harrington impresses me though.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
12/30/2008  11:20 PM
Posted by JohnWallace44:

1 - Nate
2 - Chandler
3 - Lee

the rest are all pretty much not worth ranking

Correction, we'd probably all like to see those three succeed, and even to some degree maybe Duhon and Harrington.

Yet, none of the five have done much to suggest they should be a part of a contending team of the future. Lee,Nate,Chandler, could potential be a nice trio to round out a bench some day but there have been times this season when you even have to question that.

I still say if two of the three are required to jettison Curry and Jeffries you strongly consider it.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
izybx
Posts: 22366
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 10/16/2006
Member: #1178
USA
12/31/2008  4:28 AM
Lee
Chandler
Dookie
Nate

Really beyond that noone is even close to being semi-valuable
Beat the Evil Empire. BEAT MIAMI
TheGame
Posts: 26651
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
12/31/2008  8:22 AM
I think Harrington, Lee, Duhon, Nate, and Chandler are critical to the team. Everyone else could be replaced with Development League players and our record would not be much different.
Trust the Process
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/31/2008  12:54 PM
Duhon
Lee
Chandler
Nate
Harrington
RIP Crushalot😞
daddynel
Posts: 21222
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 12/2/2003
Member: #505
1/1/2009  8:33 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

Duhon
Lee
Chandler
Nate
Harrington

all but harrington. i just don't see him here past 2010.

what i can imagine is a combo of james & (bosh, wade, or amare) plus what we already have in nate, lee, chandler, gallo. plus our picks, maybe jennings and jordan. everything else is fodder.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/1/2009  9:10 PM
Check this out:
http://www.nba.com/2009/news/01/01/010109allstarreturns/index.html
We don't have one top ten vote recipient. In other words, none of our players are among the SIXTY most popular in the league.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/1/2009  9:11 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

Duhon
Lee
Chandler
Nate
Harrington
So Harrington is better than TT?

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/1/2009  11:01 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

[quote]Posted by BRIGGS:

Duhon
Lee
Chandler
Nate
Harrington
So Harrington is better than TT?


Does it matter?

RIP Crushalot😞
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
How you would rank our players in a sense of the value for the team?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy