Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by Rookie:
Posted by King1:
I think the Knicks have a tough decision. Do you stick with Lee or trade him for lesser value. If you trade him you wont make the playoffs, if you keep him you have a better chance of making the playoffs and losing him for nothing. You always here Lee name in a trade but why arent we hearing Nate name in trades? I really cant see them trading for Diaw and Bell. I was thinking Tyrus Thomas for Lee, or Kleiza for Lee would be trades that makes sense financially
My personal opinion is that Nate and Harrington are the only two players who are not available. That said, trades would need to give us significant upgrades and/or keep to the 2010 plan (unless it involves Curry or Jeffries and trade filler). A delicate balance indeed. There's still plenty of time until the trade deadline. let's just hope everyone stays healthy
because they had good games last night? i highly doubt Chandler or Duhon is available, either.
No, because Walsh brought Harrington in and Nate's a freak. They can both change a game for you and give you options. Chandler's OK, but he has a long way to go and may or may not ever get there. Duhon a good floor general but he really needs to get his shooting % up and he's not quick enough to consistently get to the basket w/o getting his shot blocked. You see how much he shies away now. Other teams have adjusted and he can't get to the basket and they play off him because he can't hit the 'j". that hasn't stopped him from trying from the top of the key though.... I like that he wants to be the guy to take the shot or the layup when the game is close, but his long range bricks and out of control turnovers around the basket have been killing us.
12/16/2008 3:47 PM