to many question marks terrible D transitioning players=

29 wins 53 losses and a 5 seed in the draft.

I say 32 wins and 50 losses, 7 seed in the draft.

I say 28-50

... team foreits four remaining games due to death threats.

It all depends on Dice. If he plays well I have the KNicks winning 47 games. If he is not available I see them 38 to 42 wins. I still think the main goal for next year should be to get the young players time.

46-36. That is with Dice playing 75 games this year. Also i still think they r going ot make a trade especially if they really think Dice will play this year. They have way to many fowards and no guards at all. Also i think frank williams will contribute this year.
They will be the 6-7 seed and could win in the first round of the playoffs.

true GONY true.

Just using common sense:

This is still basically the same team that has won an average of 33 games a year the last two years--albeit two years older! Mcdyess miracles? I doubt it. So if we add 1+1,the answer is we have a losing team anyway. You cant have a transitional rebuilding any other way. It just doesnt make sense to keep a Ward at 6.5MM when the market says hes worth 1mm and Frank Williams is in need of development--and if he is NOT good enough bring in a smush parker et al into camp to go head to head with Frank. It doesnt make sense to play 33 year old Weatherspoon in a core unit anymore when we have 20 year old Sweetney.
Lampe also needs 15 -18 minutes a night AT A MINIMUM even to take bumbs and bruises. This team is very likely to lose anyway, so if you are going to lose you NEEdto get something out of the losing. How can you rebuild if you dont play the younger players at the expense of players who havent won??????? What team has ever been a real winning team with so many question marks? I think fans would rather see more of Sweetney and Lampe than Weatherspoon and Doleac. Andthe teamneeds toknow if Frank Williams is going to be a player or not. I said I watched Smush Parker atleast 5 times last year and in his limited minutes--he was a great prospect as a PG measuring 6-4 with serious athletiscm and a nice jumper. There is no way I would EVER pay Charle Ward 6.5mm.It's 400-500% above market for a guy who plays 60 games and 20 minutes.

Briggs, Vmart,

I agree, but what happens if the boo birds come out. I mean logic dictates we play our kids, but losing or losing big will brew an unglyness.

How can you say that the Knicks will only have 30 wins. The only legitmate threat in the east is NJ(only if mourning pays well).
the knicks do have a good team...
Houston (22-24ppg)5ast
Dyess(20ppg)10rbs
Lampe(12-16(ppg)8-10rbs
Sweetney(10-15 ppg)8-10rbs
Eisley (12-18ppg,7ast)
Van Horn(17-20 ppg)8-10rbs
Thomas(15-22)ppg 10rbs

All of these players are capable have having the above stats....houston will shine without spree.. dice has something to prove now.... lampe will do awesome this year. he also has somehting to probe... van horn... ify about, but if he does fit it, he is capable of these stats....thomas has always given us those stats....

I say 45 wins... 37 losses.... 6-8th seed playoffs maybe even better..!!!!

Listen up clones! NY will win about 43-39 games this yr and will make the playoffs.How quick to forget we had the (DICE)second and third highest(SPREE) paid guys out with an injury at the beginning of the season plus Williams sprained his wrist in summer league. This season will be a little better with the knicks playing extremely hard for CHANEY. Sweets and Lampe will put a wrinkle into the knicks offense with low post play and with that KVH and Houston will knock down timely shots.Frank Williams will be most improved knick this season.

Rofl, hardcore you are sic!