[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Easily our best center last year...
Author Thread
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/16/2008  1:42 PM
Was Zach. You look at production by position and 5 man units and the evidence is staggering. When Zach played center the Knicks were actually in the +
http://www.82games.com/0708/0708NYK2.HTM
http://www.82games.com/0708/07NYK12C.HTM

We are an uptempo team now. Eddy is fat, slow, doesnt clog the lane, doesnt rebound, doesnt block shots. He's a nice man. Happy happy joy joy

Our best line up right now is
Duhon
Crawford
Chandler
Lee
Zach
with Nate, Skinny, rooster and Q off the bench
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
AUTOADVERT
jaydh
Posts: 23155
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/16/2001
Member: #96
7/16/2008  1:48 PM
I don't think anyone questions the #s Zach is able to put up(a lot of times because he won't pass). It's more the chemistry and shedding salary(sticking to the 2010 plan) issues.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
7/16/2008  1:55 PM
in d'antoni's system, and his objective of inflating stats, i think zach will average 42 pts and 23 rebs a game.
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/16/2008  1:58 PM
excellent... so its settled then!

Seriously though.. the desperation to dump our most productive player doesnt make sense. Send Curry and JJSkinny packing. They hit the cap the same as Zach does
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
metra
Posts: 20743
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/11/2003
Member: #473
7/16/2008  1:59 PM
basketball is a stats game.
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/16/2008  2:00 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

in d'antoni's system, and his objective of inflating stats, i think zach will average 42 pts and 23 rebs a game.
well... I want to save him for the playoffs a bit so lets say if his minutes are around 35 (instead of the 40 your suggesting) I think his numbers are 22/22 50% FGs

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
7/16/2008  2:01 PM
I nominate Gallo. It can only get better for him after Tractor Taylor. Dealing with Shaq=no problem
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
7/16/2008  2:15 PM
IMO, the most overwheliming need to move him is his contract which is the most expensive and runs the longest. I don't really think we can bandage this around Zach so IMO it makes the most sense to move him.
purple012870
Posts: 21778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2003
Member: #432
7/16/2008  2:31 PM
zach is also fat & slow....and will block 1 less shot a year than EC (which puts him at 0)
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/16/2008  2:53 PM
Posted by purple012870:

zach is also fat & slow....and will block 1 less shot a year than EC (which puts him at 0)
granted he's not known for his verticle leap but he is a great fundamental rebounder and despite giving up a couple inches most nights will clean the glass. He's also very quick.

Not looking to build around the guy but I think he's our best option at the 5 right now. Hell.. we won 37 games with Kurt playing center and Chaney coaching. Zach is a 100 times better

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
7/16/2008  3:12 PM
Stephon Marbury also had great stats and was also 100X better than Charlie Ward and Howard Eisley. Same player, different positions.

Marbury- Played hard on offense. Had a lot of assists. Better than most of our PGs from before him, which didn't say anything. Frequently slacked on defense, which helped make our defense collapse, and couldn't guard quicker PGs, even when he tried. Great stats. Never really made a contribution to winning, besides that one year in Phoenix when they lost in the first round. Chemistry killer.

Zach Randolph- Plays hard on offense. Goes after boards. Great stats. Better than our current centers, which doesn't really say anything. Slacks on defense A LOT. When the ball gets to him, it doesn't come back. This was in Portland AND New York. Never made a contribution to winning besides that one year he was in the playoffs with Portland. I think that was his second year. Popular to fishmike's belief, he does not fit in Dantoni's system, becaue he requires his players to make quick decisions with the ball. Zach doesn't do that and holds it WAY too long.

If you wanna dedicate this year to padding Zachs stats so we can trade him at a high value, fine. But he's not making a contribution to us becoming a good team. Move him for as much as you can, when you can. I can't really see him helping that much though.

Move Curry too.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
7/16/2008  3:17 PM
Marbury played well on the more balanced Knick squad of 03/04 ... Zeke just kept degrading the personnel in terms of acquiring one-dimensional players and bad fits.

Not to defend Marbury tho, as he developed into public enemy number one; But I remember when he first arrived, the difference between Marbury and the previous Point Guards was astonishing.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/16/2008  7:32 PM
jeez, u dating bitty these days or something fish?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
7/16/2008  7:40 PM
Posted by sebstar:

Marbury played well on the more balanced Knick squad of 03/04 ... Zeke just kept degrading the personnel in terms of acquiring one-dimensional players and bad fits.

Not to defend Marbury tho, as he developed into public enemy number one; But I remember when he first arrived, the difference between Marbury and the previous Point Guards was astonishing.

Not denying that at all. I even said that in my post. The problem is this. Once things don't go Marbury's way, things go bad for the team. It strikes me as the same for Randolph.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Travla
Posts: 23532
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/27/2004
Member: #723
USA
7/16/2008  7:56 PM
I agree with Fishmike. Zach is our best option at center in D'Antoni's system. Zach won't be traded unless they're willing to give up another good player to move him.
Everyone on this team made selfish plays and took bad shots last season, it happens on every single team and it will continue to happen on every team. Curry can be sacrificed because he can't run in this system, he can't run at all!! Shaq slowed down the Suns and Curry will slow down the Knicks. A lot of you want to Get rid of Zach, get rid of Craw....who's gonna score? There's no one else on this team who can give us 20 pts or more a game except maybe Marbs who may or may not be on the team.
https://www.youtube.com/user/RPreston01/videos
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/16/2008  8:01 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:

Stephon Marbury also had great stats and was also 100X better than Charlie Ward and Howard Eisley. Same player, different positions.

Marbury- Played hard on offense. Had a lot of assists. Better than most of our PGs from before him, which didn't say anything. Frequently slacked on defense, which helped make our defense collapse, and couldn't guard quicker PGs, even when he tried. Great stats. Never really made a contribution to winning, besides that one year in Phoenix when they lost in the first round. Chemistry killer.

Zach Randolph- Plays hard on offense. Goes after boards. Great stats. Better than our current centers, which doesn't really say anything. Slacks on defense A LOT. When the ball gets to him, it doesn't come back. This was in Portland AND New York. Never made a contribution to winning besides that one year he was in the playoffs with Portland. I think that was his second year. Popular to fishmike's belief, he does not fit in Dantoni's system, becaue he requires his players to make quick decisions with the ball. Zach doesn't do that and holds it WAY too long.

If you wanna dedicate this year to padding Zachs stats so we can trade him at a high value, fine. But he's not making a contribution to us becoming a good team. Move him for as much as you can, when you can. I can't really see him helping that much though.

Move Curry too.
Last year they would just dump him the ball and he would work one on one for whatever shot he was going to take. Zach has great hands would really excell in a catch and shoot offense, or one where he runs down the floor, immediatly posts and takes a quick shot while someone like Lee or Chandler is crashing the offensive glass. I think he will be a good player for us next year.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
7/16/2008  8:29 PM
honestly, if you can move Curry & jj2, great.

But all three should be moved. We're not going anywhere- they're wasted on this team.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
7/16/2008  8:30 PM
Fishmike. I can agree with you on this one thing. Zachs rebounding will absolutely help out the offense.

Just a few more disagreements though. I don't think Zach is a catch and shoot player. He was not one in Portland, he wasn't one in NY. I don't think I saw him catch and shoot one time actually, this past season. And maybe it was a dump it down offense, but I am sure there were plenty of times he could have just caught it and made a quick decision.

It struck me that everytime he caught the ball on the perimeter, his INSTINCT was to put his head down and pretend to be Allan Houston by doing that jab step work for about 10 seconds and then making a move. But if you think he can be a quick decision player, after watching the way he played for us and Portland, then I guess more power to you, but then I have one more arguement...

You've acknowledged that he doesn't play any defense or try to play defense, but then you seemingly brush it away to prove your point with his offense and rebounding. Yet you're forgetting one thing. If you want to play a fast break offense, then there's 2 things. One, you HAVE to play defense in order to initiate the fast break. Two, the other team is going to try to run it back after we ran, even if we scored a bucket, because everything go scrambled from the fast break. Therefore, Zach is going to have to run back on defense, when we know for a fact that he hardly tries. There's no way that can work and there's no way Zach would be able to play major minutes if he can't get back on defense to at least attempt to block shots and stop his man.

We never even mentioned this issue. You really think Zach is going to run everytime? I personally don't, let alone both ways.

He's not a fit.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
7/16/2008  8:57 PM
^ I saw him catch the ball sometimes, and I saw him shoot it other times. Ergo, he is a catch-and-shoot-player.
https:// It's not so hard.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/16/2008  9:01 PM
i've also seen him run sometimes & i'm pretty sure he owns a few firearms as well... that must also make him a run & gun type player.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Easily our best center last year...

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy